Federal workers in Maine are backing legislation to help ensure they can pay their bills in case of a government shutdown.
Those who might be furloughed or required to work without pay are requesting access to state-backed, no-interest loans.
Alana Schaeffer, president of the Metal Trades Council at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, said the 6,000 workers overhauling the nation's submarines deserve support.
"I watch the anxiety of our workers who are just trying to feed their family, pay their bills, lace up their boots and come in and serve their country every day," Schaeffer observed.
Schaeffer pointed out the loans would be repaid when the government reopens and employees receive retroactive paychecks. The legislation is sponsored by Sen. Troy Jackson, D-Aroostook, president of the Senate, and received little pushback in a committee hearing. The next federal funding deadline is March 22.
Legislation to fully fund federal agencies was supposed to have been enacted into law by October 1, the start of the 2024 fiscal year, but lawmakers have instead relied on a series of stopgap spending measures to keep the government open.
Schaeffer noted while Congress debates immigration and foreign aid packages, federal workers are left wondering about their next paycheck, and area businesses are wondering if they can remain open.
"That's money that people are paying at our local restaurants, at the gas station down the road," Schaeffer explained. "When they have to make cuts, the rest of our local community also see the ripple effects of that."
The 2018 government shutdown left federal employees without being paid for 35 days. Schaffer added she trusts Maine lawmakers will support the workers who remain dedicated to America's defense, regardless of the political climate in the nation's capital.
get more stories like this via email
President Joe Biden was in Wisconsin on Wednesday, touting plans for a new Microsoft data center. The visit comes amid new polling data in battleground states about what is on the minds of rural voters, with organizers noting surprising results.
The poll, released by the Rural Democracy Initiative, includes feedback from Wisconsin voters. Among respondents, 57% said they favored a more economic populist vision, with policies centered around lowering costs and raising incomes for the working class.
Patrick Toomey, researcher and partner of Breakthrough Campaigns, said the approach appears more popular than one often touted by GOP politicians.
"Just cutting taxes and getting rid of regulations is not going to do the most to help me in this economy," Toomey explained.
While economic policies aligned with Democrats, such as minimum-wage hikes, are favorable in this poll, many rural voters indicated they think Republicans are doing more for working people. Analysts said it shows Democrats have work to do to rebuild trust in these areas. Meanwhile, three-quarters of respondents either support the right to abortion or do not want the government interfering with decisions on reproductive health care.
Toomey acknowledged it will take some time for Democrats to re-connect with voters and it will not completely turn around in this election cycle. But he suggested it is not completely hopeless for the party to make gains in rural America ahead of November's vote.
"One of the key learnings here is that there are enough voters in rural areas of battleground states who are up for grabs to determine the outcome for 2024," Toomey reported.
He suggested if Democrats are savvy with their outreach, they might be able to convince rural populations they are pursuing policies voters have outlined as a top priority.
More than 1,700 voters in 10 states were part of the poll. As for Biden's appearance, it was at the same location as the failed Foxconn project announced by former President Donald Trump several years ago.
Disclosure: The Rural Democracy Initiative contributes to our fund for reporting on Environment, Health Issues, Rural/Farming, and Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
On this May Day, Wisconsin groups are rallying in Green Bay to highlight a key issue facing the working class: the ability to retire.
Organizers see fixing systemic issues within Social Security as a key step. The American Federation of Government Employees is co-leading demonstrations around the state, calling on Congress to fully fund Social Security.
Jessica LaPointe, president of the American Federation of Government Employees Council 220, said although the debate has been around for a while, the problems run deep right now, with chronic underfunding resulting in staffing woes at field offices.
She noted staffers are dealing with added stress and beneficiaries feel the impact.
"Service delays are far and wide," LaPointe observed. "It could take more than four months to start your retirement benefits up."
She emphasized it is especially concerning for vulnerable populations at retirement age. Beyond helping with administrative costs, demonstrators want federal lawmakers to come up with long-term funding solutions, amid predictions the program won't be able to provide full benefits a decade from now. Some Republicans have routinely floated cuts but critics of the idea say any future shortfalls should be covered by higher earners.
One recommendation is to adjust the cap on Social Security taxes, but opponents warn of unintended consequences.
Alex Brower, executive director of the Wisconsin Alliance for Retired Americans, which is also supporting the rallies, said retirees on fixed incomes deserve full and expanded benefits for dedicating their working lives to propping up the economy.
"We wouldn't have the schools that we have or any of the systems in our economy without working people," Brower pointed out. "When those working people retire, we are demanding that retirement be dignified."
He added May Day observances, which center around worker solidarity, are a good way to remind policymakers the working class should not fall into poverty when they retire. Similar rallies are scheduled throughout the month.
Disclosure: The American Federation of Government Employees contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy and Priorities, Livable Wages/Working Families, and Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Proposed regulations in Michigan could have a major impact on the state's tourism industry. The series of 10 bills introduced by House Democrats would do more to regulate short-term rentals.
The proposals include a 6% tax on rentals of 15 days or more, increased safety requirements for things like smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors, and a $100 annual registration fee per listing.
Erika Farley, executive director of the Rental Property Owners Association of Kent County, said she has concerns - especially about the additional tax.
"We are looking for more parity along with the hotel industry, basically," said Farley. "The 6% excise tax, along with the other taxes, would actually be a higher tax - anywhere between 5% and 7% for short-term rentals - than it would for an actual, traditional hotel."
Farley added that short-term rentals aren't just for tourists - they're also an affordable option for professionals who need a temporary place to stay while in town on business.
In New Buffalo, a lakefront community with a population of about 1,800, Mayor John Humphrey said he doesn't agree with every aspect of the bills - but he's all for taxing short-term rentals.
Humphrey said his community has suffered for year due to what he calls the "gigantic" unrecovered tourism costs generated by these rentals - including negative affects on roads, sewer, water, and other public infrastructure.
"Every short-term rental has a residential use of 10 - residential use means the number of people that use the home - where a standard residence is only 2.2," said Humphrey. "And those costs are not recovered because there are no excise taxes, there are no use taxes, there are no lodging taxes on short-term rental."
If passed, the legislation could generate between $35 and $70 million. Backers say that money would be distributed to the local governments where the rental properties are located.
The bills have been referred to the Committee on Local Government and Municipal Finance.
get more stories like this via email