California ya debería contar con su presupuesto estatal desde el pasado primero de julio, cuando mucho, pero no lo tiene. El Gobernador Arnold Schwarzenegger dice que, debido a este retraso – el mayor en la historia del estado – muchas clínicas y hospitales serán afectados severamente. La raíz del problema es que, simplemente, los legisladores han fracasado en sus intentos por ponerse de acuerdo respecto al nuevo plan de egresos.

Howard Kahn, Presidente Ejecutivo de L.A. Care Health Plan (Plan para la Atención de la Salud de Los Ángeles), comenta que su organización ya tuvo que sacar 55 millones de dólares de sus reservas, para seguir operando y evitar su cierre definitivo. Pero obviamente, esto no durará para siempre.

De esta manera, el hecho de que California no tenga presupuesto significa que miles de californianos no tengan servicios de salud, especialmente los más necesitados; porque este callejón sin salida en el que se encuentra el presupuesto, que ni para atrás ni para adelante, daña especialmente los centros de atención que operan dentro del programa estatal Medi-Cal, encargado de atender a dichas personas.

"Son quienes atienden a la gente que cuenta con Medi-Cal y a la que no tiene seguro, y operan con un presupuesto muy corto para arrancar, y si se les suspenden los pagos por un tiempo, como ha estado haciendo el Estado, un día desaparecerán."

Kahn hace la advertencia de que, si cierran las clínicas, más gente acudirá y llenará las salas de emergencia para que se atiendan sus necesidades. Pero además de que el retraso del presupuesto crece, se están practicando suspensiones de pago a los proveedores de productos de salud, y eso podrá tener efectos devastadores.

"Creo que hay un asunto mayor, que va más allá de adoptar el presupuesto actual, y es qué contiene ese presupuesto. De veras le suspenderán a proveedores los pagos que no han aumentado en cinco años? Hay un asunto de plazo más largo."

El Gobernador Schwarzenegger, ante esta situación, quiere que los ciudadanos californianos presionen a sus legisladores para que hagan su trabajo, porque él no puede.

"Yo puedo pedírselos, puedo rogarles, ofrecerles que hacer el trabajo traerá un futuro mejor, todas esas cosas - pero no puedo obligarlos a que lo hagan."

L.A. Care Health Plan es el mayor plan público de salud de todo el país, y ofrece más información en su portal de internet www.lacare.org.




get more stories like this via email

After more than 50 years of use, some Michigan lawmakers say naloxone may not be the best choice in an overdose situation.

Naloxone is sometimes called the "Lazarus drug" because of its powerful ability to seemingly resurrect people after a drug overdose.

Sen. Kevin Hertel, D-St. Clair Shores, and some of his colleagues have introduced a bill which would open the door for what they say are more costly, but more powerful, antidotes.

"Given the prevalence of fentanyl in our communities, and how much stronger some of these drugs that we're now seeing are, we believe -- and in talking with others -- that there should be other tools to respond to an overdose," Hertel explained. "To make sure we're doing everything we can to save somebody's life."

Not everyone is on board with the proposed legislation, Senate Bill 542. Opponents argued the more expensive naloxone alternatives are not necessary, and using them would only increase profits for the pharmaceutical industry.

Jonathan Stoltman, director of the Opioid Policy Institute in Grand Rapids, said while the naloxone alternatives do help in overdose situations, they can also cause nasty side effects.

"The newer approaches, they put people into more severe withdrawal," Stoltman pointed out. "That's a pretty profound negative side effect. The one approach is very inexpensive and works great; the other approach is far more expensive and has this strong negative side effect."

Sponsors of the bill say they're hoping to give Michigan residents a chance to chime in on the issue in a public hearing sometime in June. Michigan saw more than 3,000 opioid overdose deaths in 2021.


get more stories like this via email

New Mexico saw record enrollment numbers for the Affordable Care Act this year and is now setting its sights on lowering out-of-pocket costs - those not reimbursed by insurance. More than 56,000 New Mexicans are enrolled in a medical health insurance plan on the state exchange - an increase of 12,000 people overall.

Colin Baillio, deputy superintendent with the state's Office of Insurance, said the state has boosted its outreach and made efforts to improve the overall consumer experience.

"We saw a 40% year-over-year increase, and New Mexico saw the biggest percentage increase during the open-enrollment period among all of the state-based marketplaces," he explained

Part of the enrollment increase is due to what's called the "unwinding" - a federal directive that required all states to redetermine Medicaid eligibility following a three-year pause on checks during the COVID pandemic. He said by using expanded tools made available by the federal and state government, 8% of New Mexico's population is now uninsured - down from 23% in 2010.

Following approval by lawmakers in the 2024 legislative session, the New Mexico governor signed seven health care-related bills into law - one of which requires annual reporting of prescription drug pricing. Baililo said the Affordable Care Act built the foundation that has allowed the state to pursue additional affordability initiatives.

"I'm really glad to see that there's so much interest in the next step of health reform, really leaning into these out-of-pocket cost issues and making it easier for people to afford to stay covered and see their doctors," he continued.

Two years ago, the state also passed a one-of-a-kind law that did away with behavioral health co-pays for people in certain insurance plans.

New York's medical aid-in-dying bill is gaining further support. The Medical Society of the State of New York is supporting the bill. New York's bill allows terminally ill people with only six months to live to use this option, with safeguards requiring two physicians' approval.

The bill's Assembly sponsor Amy Paulin, D-Westchester, said despite the growing support, other hurdles lie ahead.

"Now we have what I believe, if it came to the floor, a majority. There's still a hesitation on the part of leadership. You know, we need members to assure leadership that they no longer have reservations," she said.

Other newly resolved concerns center on making sure insurance companies and doctors who don't support this aren't held liable. She's optimistic the bill will pass after nine years in the Legislature. New York would be the 11th state along with Washington, D.C. to have medical aid in dying legislation.

Corinne Carey, senior New York campaign director with Compassion and Choices finds the pandemic drew a vivid picture of a person's end-of-life experience. There were images of people dying on ventilators, apart from loved ones, and unable to communicate. She said people began thinking about a "good death."

"And, what is a good death is being surrounded by loved ones, having some measure of control, experiencing the touch of your loved ones, and being the one in the driver's seat," she explained.

Now people have different options for end-of-life care, each of which presents various challenges. Polls show medical aid in dying has garnered considerable support since being introduced in 2015. A 2022 Compassion and Choices poll finds 57% of nurses support medical aid in dying professionally, although fewer support it personally.