HOUSTON – A raíz de que al psicólogo forense George Denkowski se le prohibiera este mes dar su testimonio experto en las cortes de Texas, los abogados especialistas en la pena de muerte presionan para que se obligue a las cortes a revisar procesos del pasado que se hayan basado en creencias científicas falsas.

Luego del veto impuesto a Denkowski para hacer evaluaciones post-juicio en las cortes del estado, los abogados defensores esperaban que pudieran revisarse los argumentos que usó en su desacreditado testimonio. Pero como las cortes son tan cautelosas para reabrir cualquier caso, pudiera ser necesaria la acción legislativa para obligarles a plegarse al consenso científico. Actualmente la ley permite que se reabran casos cuando la evidencia de DNA pudiera cambiar el resultado. Kathryn Kase, abogada especialista en la pena de muerte y directora del "Trial Project" en el Texas Defender Service (Servicio de Defensoría de Texas), apoya una legislación aplicable a más tipos de evidencias.

"Necesitamos ampliar la ley, para que los cambios en la ciencia – o la práctica de ciencia de pacotilla – permitan a una persona solicitar nuevos exámenes y revisiones."

Una iniciativa pendiente en el Congreso estatal ya lleva medio camino recorrido, dice Kase, quien quiere que se enmiende no sólo para incorporar el avance científico, sino también el problema de la "ciencia chatarra". El testimonio que ofreciera el psicólogo vetado, George Denkowski, ayudó a condenar al menos a 14 prisioneros sentenciados a muerte, al declarar que todos tenían una inteligencia normal. Kase está convencida de que al menos algunos de ellos sufren, de hecho, retardo mental. Ejecutar a los retardados mentales está prohibido desde 2002, por norma de la Suprema Corte.

Kase afirma que en cuestiones de vida o muerte no tiene cabida la ciencia improvisada, dudosa ni fraudulenta.

"Si voy al doctor a que me examine para saber si tengo cáncer, y luego me doy cuenta de que ese doctor simplemente no hizo las pruebas de cáncer, ¿iría con otro médico para que me examine otra vez? ¡Claro que sí!"

En opinión de sus pares, Denkowski en efecto armó su propio criterio, incluso inflando ciertas mediciones de coeficiente intelectual, basado en el supuesto de que las pruebas tradicionales no toman en cuenta cultura, estilo de vida ni etnia. Denkowski aceptó dejar de ejercer en las cortes, mediante un acuerdo que establece que sus violaciones no pueden ser usadas como base para reabrir y volver a litigar otros casos criminales en los que él haya participado como experto.


get more stories like this via email

A package to improve public safety is moving ahead in the California state Legislature - with a floor vote in the State Assembly on the first bill expected this week.

Assembly Bill 2215 puts into statute that police officers have the discretion to send people arrested for low-level offenses directly to supportive services.

Anthony DiMartino - government affairs director with the nonprofit Californians for Safety and Justice - said sometimes public safety is best served when people avoid arrest and instead get therapy, addiction support or help getting a job.

"We're also hoping to raise awareness that this is something officers can do, and then also encourage partnerships more with officers to look at what's in their community," said DiMartino, "as alternatives to jail booking."

A second bill would increase transparency and accountability on money sent to the counties as part of the Public Safety Realignment.

A third bill would require police officers, prosecuting attorneys and investigators to identify themselves any time they're interviewing a family member of someone killed or severely injured by police.

DiMartino said they also support AB 2499, which would ensure that survivors of violent crime and their family members can take unpaid time off work to address safety concerns and heal.

"We're hoping to broaden the scope a bit," said DiMartino, "and make it more clear that family members of victims are able to also tap into unpaid leave to support their family member that has been a victim."

A fifth bill would make it easier for justice-involved people and crime victims to speak freely during restorative justice programs - by making the communications inadmissible in other legal proceedings.

Missouri went through with its first execution of the year, as Brian Dorsey was put to death last night, just after 6 p.m. CT.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to stop Dorsey's execution. He was convicted of murdering his cousin Sarah Bonnie and her husband Ben nearly 20 years ago.

The advocacy group Missourians to Abolish the Death Penalty launched several recent campaigns on Dorsey's behalf to spare his life.

Jenni Gerhauser, a cousin to both Dorsey and Sarah Bonnie, expressed belief in his redemption.

"Brian is more than the worst moment of his life," Gerhauser stressed. "There is so much more to him."

Gerhauser fondly remembered him as fun and charming from their visits during holidays. Dorsey's current lawyers said he was in a drug-induced psychosis when he killed the Bonnies in 2006 and his attorneys at the time had been offered money, preventing them from fighting the death penalty with his guilty plea deal.

Gov. Mike Parson confirmed Monday the state would move forward with Dorsey's death sentence, rejecting a separate request for clemency. More than 70 current and former corrections officers had urged the governor to commute Dorsey's sentence, arguing he had been rehabilitated.

Claudia Boyce, also a cousin in the family, said it should not be a decision for the state to make.

"You know, that's supposed to be God's decision, not ours," Boyce contended.

Dorsey received a lethal injection Tuesday evening. Lethal injection became an option for people on Missouri's death row in 1987, alongside lethal gas.


get more stories like this via email

Amid overcrowding and unsafe conditions in West Virginia jails, state lawmakers introduced bills that would allow judges to take a 'second look' at an individual's original sentence.

If a court determines they no longer pose a threat to the community, the person could be released, placed on supervision, or receive a shortened sentence.

Sara Whitaker - criminal legal policy analyst with the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy - said West Virginia is one of the few states that has seen its prison population balloon over the past decade, despite declining crime.

She noted that as of last month, more than 500 people in the state were in jail awaiting transfer to a prison.

"As a result, eight out of 10 of the regional jails in the state were beyond capacity," said Whitaker, "with hundreds of people assigned to sleeping on the floor."

The bills failed to advance this session, but Whitaker said advocates are hopeful lawmakers will consider them next year.

The state's jails remain among the deadliest in the country, with at least 91 people losing their lives while incarcerated in the past few years.

According to the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy, jail bills cost counties $45 million in 2022.

Nationwide, long sentences have led to growth in the number of older people behind bars.

Whitaker pointed out that 'Second Look' legislation could help the state avoid turning its prisons into nursing homes, and said the number of elderly people in prison has tripled in the past two decades.

"In 2019, West Virginia had to open a dementia unit in one of its prisons," said Whitaker. "There are hospice units across multiple prisons. And experts predict that this is just only going to get worse."

Whitaker added that 'Second Look' policies also offer a way to correct past racial injustice in the criminal legal system.

Black people incarcerated in West Virginia are four times more likely than white people to be serving a life sentence with the possibility of parole, and five times as likely to be serving a life-without-parole sentence.




get more stories like this via email