DENVER – As the FCC takes steps to reverse net neutrality, a term for a free and open internet, researchers say a key assumption for the move does not hold water.

In his argument to revisit the Obama-era rule, current FCC chairman Ajit Pai cited a paper published in an academic journal that claimed the agency had failed to consider the economic impacts on industry.

Jefferson Pooley, assistant professor at Muhlenberg College and co-author of a new study published in the same International Journal for Communication, says Pai's position is based on a paper riddled with factual errors and unsubstantiated claims.

"We showed that this core claim was incorrect, that in fact, economists had been perhaps more active in coming up with the net-neutrality rules than ever before," he notes.

Pooley's team also found that the article cited by Pai was paid for by CALinnovates, a PR group that specializes in promoting policy for AT&T, an internet service provider that Pooley says could benefit if open-internet rules are reversed.

Proponents of rolling back net neutrality say regulating ISPs as a utility hampers innovation and investment.

Pooley believes the failure to disclose industry funding amounts to "information laundering," making it possible for the FCC director to cite an academic publication without any trace of AT&T's fingerprints.

He says it's important for the public, and public officials, to know whose interests are behind the research.

"We would probably dismiss a claim that AT&T made directly against net neutrality since they stand to gain financially," he says. "So instead of making the argument directly, they funded academics who published an article in an academic journal."

Pooley adds that CALinnovates threatened legal action against the Journal and the University of Southern California, its host, unless material involving the firm was removed.

The FCC is accepting public comments on its plan, called "Restoring Internet Freedom," through July 17 at www.fcc.gov.


get more stories like this via email

Indiana ranks 50th in the nation for voter turnout, just ahead of West Virginia, according to the Indiana Bar Foundation Civic Health Index.

Kate Sweeney Bell, clerk of Marion County, is determined to change the statistic as she prepares for the Presidential election on Nov. 5. She urged Hoosiers to register by Oct. 7.

"It's not automatic," Sweeney Bell pointed out. "If you have a reasonable expectation to be out of the country on Election Day, if you're caring for someone who is confined or if you're confined to your residence, those are some of the reasons that you can vote absentee by mail."

Early voting is Oct. 8 through Nov. 4, giving voters ample opportunity to cast their ballots. Sweeney Bell stressed the importance of absentee voting.

Sweeney Bell also highlighted a new law recently passed to protect poll and election workers.

"I would say to anyone who is thinking of causing a stink at a vote center: We have a new law on the books I supported to make it a felony to intimidate or harm a poll worker," Sweeney Bell emphasized.

Madison County recently received a $188,000 grant ahead of Election Day. The money from the Help America Vote Act is a fraction of the $1 million being distributed throughout the state. Madison County is using the money to buy new electronic poll books, backup batteries for voting machines and to make improvements to the county's election website. However, it is not only money needed for the election. In Indianapolis, Sweeney Bell said she needs people to work at polls.

"We never have enough," Sweeney Bell acknowledged. "We will cover every vote center that we have for Election Day, and here in Marion County, we have 186 locations. We're going to be busy, busy, busy."


get more stories like this via email

A close primary race in Washington state is highlighting the issue of vote splitting and how ranked choice voting could provide a solution.

The Commissioner of Public Lands' race is still too close to call more than two weeks after the election and could be heading for a recount. It is a top two primary, meaning the two highest vote-getters will go on to the general election.

Tony Ivey, political and civic engagement manager for the advocacy group Washington Conservation Action, said it has created an odd situation where the majority of Washingtonians voted for Democratic candidates, but two Republicans could face off in November.

"We became very concerned about the potential of vote splitting," Ivey explained. "While Washington voters heavily support climate-friendly candidates and heavily support climate action, we could end up with a situation where, despite the majority of voters selecting a climate friendly candidate, two non-climate friendly candidates could end up in the general election."

Ivey pointed out it could have been avoided by using a ranked choice voting system to let voters rank the candidates who aligned with their views.

Ranked choice voting is catching on across the country, including in Washington, where Seattle will implement the system in city primary elections in 2027.

Nilu Jenks, political director for the nonprofit FairVote Washington, said not every city or county in the state can do it, which is why her organization has been pushing the legislature to pass a local options bill. She argued a ranked-choice system would engage more voters.

"In a time when we're finding voter participation is dropping, I hope to see more people embrace ranked choice voting," Jenks emphasized. "One, we can avoid vote splitting and see people's preferences actually show up on the general ballot, but two, where voters feel like their voice matters."

Ranked choice voting has faced opposition, including from Secretary of State Steve Hobbs, who said the system is too confusing and would create accessibility issues.

But Ivey rejected his assessment, saying ranked-choice would actually do the opposite.

"What we see is that ranked choice voting makes our system more democratic," Ivey stressed. "It better reflects the will of the voters and it's very easy."


get more stories like this via email

The Democratic National Convention in Chicago is buzzing with energy and several Hoosiers are there on the ground, ushering in Vice President Kamala Harris' presumed nomination.

Derek Camp, chairman of the Allen County Democratic Party and a delegate to the convention, said Hoosier voters are concerned about ensuring women's reproductive rights.

"One of the tings I hear the most back home is Indiana is reproductive rights -- a woman's right to choose as well as birth control -- those are very important and high on the minds of a lot of voters back home in Indiana," Camp explained. "It's certainly something that Donald Trump has made clear that he is going to remove."

Camp sees voter enthusiasm growing in Indiana, especially among young people who are stepping forward to get involved knocking on doors and becoming party precinct chairs. Camp pointed out he has not seen this kind of energy in Indiana since 2008 when President Barack Obama was elected to his first term. It was also the first time since 1964 Indiana chose a Democrat for president.

While the historic nomination of Kamala Harris at the top of the Democratic ticket sizzles, Camp noted Democrats are also thankful for the years of service from President Joe Biden.

"What he also has done and shown yet again is he has got decades of service to his country and to his community," Camp stressed. "And by understanding that the best thing for this country is him stepping aside and passing the baton to the very capable Vice President Harris who will make history herself. "

The Indiana delegation is being led by former U.S. Sen. Joe Donnelly, who recently stepped down as U.S. ambassador to the Holy See. By the close of the four-day convention, Indiana's 88 delegates will have played a key role in nominating Vice President Kamala Harris and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as the Democratic candidates for the 2024 presidential election.


get more stories like this via email