Critics: MT Lawmakers Take Top-Down Approach on Wilderness Study Areas
Friday, February 26, 2021
HELENA, Mont. - A measure in the state Legislature could remove protections from a Wilderness Study Area in southwestern Montana. Opponents see it as effort to repeal other study areas in a top-down manner.
Senate Joint Resolution 7 would remove Hidden Pasture Creek's study-area designation. The designations are aimed at determining if the areas have wilderness characteristics.
Jack Kirkley is a professor of biology at the University of Montana Western who noted he wasn't speaking on behalf of the school. He agreed that it's time to resolve the issue of these study areas, but said passing resolutions in the Legislature is not right way.
"Simply saying here's our resolution to take it away and not have any further study or consideration of it is sort of shortcutting the input by citizens," said Kirkley.
A report from the Legislature's Environmental Quality Council last year determined a collaboration among many stakeholders was the best way to approach Montana's study areas. In state Sen. Jeff Welborn - R-Dillon's - resolution, he said the designation precludes Beaverhead County from addressing transportation issues within the area.
The resolution has a hearing today in the Senate Natural Resources Committee.
In 2017 and 2018, U.S. Sen. Steve Daines and former U.S. Rep. Greg Gianforte introduced legislation in Congress that would have stripped Wilderness Study Areas in Montana of their designations.
Mike Wilkinson is a former U.S. Forest Service employee who lives in Wise River. He said there has been local opposition to opening these areas up.
"The public input is important," said Wilkinson, "and these politicians can't just make decisions about public lands without consulting the people that live there."
Kirkley said public input is an integral part of this process.
"If you don't have a collaborative process, then you really won't have a public buy-in because people want to know that they weren't closed out of the discussion," said Kirkley. "It's public lands. There's a lot of sentiment that we own the land and we should have a say in it."
Conservation groups including the Montana Wilderness Association, Montana Wildlife Federation and Business for Montana's Outdoors sent a letter urging the Senate Natural Resources Committee to withdraw Senate Joint Resolution 7 and move forward with a collaborative approach to study areas.
get more stories like this via email
SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Climate activists are praising Gov. Gavin Newsom for signing a $15 billion climate action package Thursday, but argued he …
BROOKLYN, N.Y. -- Some New Yorkers are voicing concerns about the creation of not one, but two draft maps for congressional, State Senate and …
LANSING, Mich. -- Michigan advocates for children and families are praising many of the investments in the 2022 state budget passed this week…
DES MOINES, Iowa -- There is strong public support in Iowa to enact a state law that criminalizes elder abuse, a topic also being discussed by law …
SALT LAKE CITY -- A researcher at the University of Utah said plans for generating renewable energy should include a power source right under our feet…
CHICAGO -- Advocates for immigrants and refugees in Illinois traveled to Washington, D.C., this week to push for a pathway to citizenship for up to …
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. -- Arkansas produces more rice than any other state, and a new grant will help farmers explore ways to transition the industry to …
BISMARCK, N.D. -- North Dakota lawmakers in charge of redistricting have approved a preliminary draft of new legislative boundaries, but voters' …