MONTICELLO, Utah - The 30 by 30 Plan, also called the "the "America the Beautiful" campaign" campaign, aims to preserve 30% of the nation's public lands and water sources by 2030. But its pledge to fight the climate crisis could face hurdles.
The Biden administration initiative acknowledges a tipping point in damage done to the natural world, and calls for decisive action to reverse that damage.
Aaron Weiss, deputy director at the Center for Western Priorities said native tribes in Utah are urging the government to fully restore the Grand Staircase Escalante and Bears Ears national monuments, which both saw their footprints reduced by the Trump administration.
"We saw the Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition, which is led by the five tribes that originally requested that Bears Ears be protected as a national monument, running ads in Utah and in D.C. to encourage President Biden to quickly take action," said Weiss.
Weiss said conservation groups also back preserving several other parcels of land across the West under the 30 by 30 initiative.
Critics say the Biden proposal lacks a baseline of how much land and water already is under conservation, and specifics on how it will proceed.
Kim Pope, a campaign representative with the Sierra Club in the Southwest Region, said New Mexico may have the most to gain from the 30 by 30 plan.
In a presentation to the Sierra Club Rio Grande Chapter this week, she said it's not only critical to focus on acreage, but also to get people involved who want to solve the climate crisis.
"We want to work with communities and make sure that the conservation efforts make sense for the community, that are equitable for all communities that lack green space or lack outdoor space," said Pope. "Nearly 760,000 acres of natural lands were lost to development in New Mexico between 2001 and 2017."
Pope says currently, just 12% of the nation's public lands and waters are protected. So far, 50 counties and 70 U.S. mayors have committed to the 30 by 30 goal, including Erin Mendenhall of Salt Lake City.
get more stories like this via email
Virginia has some of the fastest-eroding coastline in the U.S, so an effort at one federal agency is bringing new focus to the region.
Inside the Commerce Department lies NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. In recent years, NOAA has designated Habitat Focus Areas in select locations around the country to attempt to restore coastal habitats.
The newest area is Virginia's Middle Peninsula, and Andrew Larkin - a senior program analyst with NOAA Fisheries in Virginia - explained why.
"The Middle Peninsula was selected because it's an area that's experiencing some impacts from climate change," said Larkin. "It's an area that's experiencing a lot of flooding, and they've seen some decline in their seafood industry."
The sudden loss of infrastructure during large storms is easy to see, with washed-out highways, rail lines and utilities. But the longer-term economic impacts of habitat loss are harder to spot.
Habitat Focus Areas help to bring resources from different levels of government to bear on problems that may be too big for local governments to handle.
Efforts to slow coastal erosion in the past were often limited to concrete or rock structures like bulkheads or riprap shorelines. In some areas of the Middle Peninsula, NOAA is stabilizing the coast using so-called "living shorelines."
Larkin described how they incorporate plants and marine life to create sustainable and stable shore conditions.
"By using things like plants or oyster structures - so we're talking marsh grass or things like oyster castles - these are concrete structures which oysters adhere to, and then the oysters provide kind of a wave break," said Larkin. "So, when you've got waves that are kind of pounding a shoreline, these will kind of break up and weaken those waves. And the plants behind them, the marsh grass, will help to trap the sediment to prevent erosion from happening."
Changes to shore ecosystems often have a direct impact on jobs connected to fishing and tourism, and communities see their tax base eroded as residents and businesses leave. So, efforts to stabilize shorelines are not only seen as helping the environment but making local communities more resilient.
Lewie Lawrence, executive director of the Middle Peninsula Planning District Commission, said it's about striking a balance.
"We've got to try to figure out how do we find balance and parity," said Lawrence. "If you put too much development pressure on one side, you cause too much environmental damage. If you protect too much on one side, you're losing the ability to generate economic revenue, which is needed to make government function through tax revenue."
More information on NOAA Habitat Focus Areas is online at www.habitatblueprint.noaa.gov
Support for this reporting was provided by The Pew Charitable Trusts.
get more stories like this via email
Conservation groups along several states on the East coast stretching from North Carolina to northeast Florida are working through a plan to conserve one million acres of salt marsh nearly the size of Grand Canyon National Park.
When it comes to Mother Nature, state boundaries are non-existent - so environmental groups, scientists, native communities and state and federal agencies are working together on the South Atlantic Salt Marsh Initiative Project.
It's a voluntary, collaborative plan to help states protect channels of coastal grasslands that do more than meets the eye.
Kent Smith - a biological administrator with the Aquatic Habitat Conservation and Restoration Section of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - said salt marshes are extremely good at sequestering carbon from the atmosphere by forming a thick peat to trap the CO2 in the sediments below.
"They also stabilize the shorelines in coast areas," said Smith. "So they keep sediments in place and they protect properties from the impacts of climate change, sea-level rise, tropical storms, things like that."
Smith said coastal development threatens the natural protections salt marshes provide, and their hope is to spread awareness so communities and developers can work together to protect these natural habitats.
Jim McCarthy - president of the North Florida Land Trust - is part of the initiative and works to buy salt marshes to preserve and protect them. He said manmade solutions to protect areas from things like storm surges don't always work.
He said one example is in Jacksonville, where marsh grasses were taken out of an area and replaced with concrete bulkheads. He said that was disastrous during Hurricane Irma.
"And as the St. Johns River turns east," said McCarthy, "it literally went over its banks because there is nothing to make the energy out of it and there is nothing to absorb it, if you will, as there would be if you had had natural marsh grasses. "
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration estimates that the U.S. loses 80,000 acres of coastal wetlands, including salt marshes, each year, driven by development and sea-level rise.
Support for this reporting was provided by The Pew Charitable Trusts.
get more stories like this via email
West Virginia has received federal Infrastructure Bill funding to complete the Corridor H Highway, a four-lane route beginning in Tucker County and connecting with Interstate 81 in Strasburg, Virginia.
Some environmental groups and local residents argued the project's current route could disrupt wildlife habitat and local economies based on outdoor recreation and tourism.
Hugh Rogers, board member and chair of the highways committee for the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, said small towns around Blackwater Falls would feel the impact from increased traffic and congestion.
"The people on the mountain who live in Thomas and Davis, they don't want a four-lane slamming right between their towns," Rogers emphasized. "And causing a whole different kind of development probably from the kind that has been very successful."
More than 120 miles of Corridor H is now open, with around 30 miles left to complete, according to the West Virginia Department of Transportation. The state maintains the project will open up remote areas in Grant, Tucker and Hardy counties to economic development and shorten travel times through the mountains.
But Rogers countered the outdoor tourism small businesses and residents have worked to build up around Blackwater Falls is at stake. He pointed out travelers come to the area to escape major development.
"And there's just all this opportunity for recreation," Rogers explained. "As you know, mountain biking is very big around here. Lots of hiking, of course. Rafting and kayaking on the river, it's just a wonderful playground"
He added nearly 2,000 residents have signed an online petition calling for the highway's path to be diverted from the Blackwater region to an alternate route.
"For years, people thought, we have to take whatever the Department of Highways gives us; we just 'want' the changes that it will bring," Rogers noted. "Now, more and more people are getting the idea that we don't have to settle for a lousy version of this."
Research from the Allegheny Blue Ridge Alliance shows the highway could potentially impact threatened and endangered species such as Cheat Mountain salamander, Indiana bat, Virginia big-eared bat and West Virginia flying squirrel.
get more stories like this via email