Más de 60 empresas en Pensilvania firmaron una carta a los líderes legislativos pidiéndoles que se concentren en mejorar el clima económico y abandonen los esfuerzos que dificultan el voto a las personas.
La carta llama la atención sobre el Acuerdo 77, ley estatal de votación por correo sin excusas aprobada en 2019. La misma ha enfrentado desafíos legales, después de que un juez de la Corte de la Commonwealth, a principios de este año, se puso de lado de algunos legisladores republicanos, que dicen que viola la Constitución estatal. Richard Eidlin de Business for America dice que algunas empresas sienten que ha habido una cantidad innecesaria de atención en volver a litigar las elecciones de 2020.
"Sentimos que la Legislatura no ha abordado problemas más importantes como la recuperación de la pandemia. Así que nuestra intención con la carta era dar a conocer que la comunidad empresarial realmente espera que los demócratas y republicanos encuentren formas de trabajar juntos", comentó Eidlin.
El Acuerdo o Ley 77 está a la espera de una decisión de la Corte Suprema del estado y está vigente para las elecciones primarias del próximo martes. Eidlin explica que Business for America ha reunido a líderes republicanos y demócratas en una serie de diálogos para encontrar puntos en común sobre los derechos de voto y la integridad y seguridad de las elecciones.
Jabari Jones dirige West Philadelphia Corridor Collaborative, una asociación empresarial. Él dice que el 92% de sus negocios cerraron temporalmente durante la pandemia. Agrega que le gustaría ver que el estado se asegure de que más dólares del Plan de Rescate Estadounidense lleguen a las empresas.
"Hicimos una encuesta con unas 100 empresas en nuestro distrito y descubrimos que la empresa promedio tenía alrededor de $9,000 en gastos atrasados impagos que están cerrados por la pandemia. Así que hubo una oportunidad de invertir parte del dinero de la ayuda en casos de desastre para ayudar a las empresas a ponerse al día", agregó Jones.
Dennis Guy dirige First Sip Brew Box, una empresa de medios de comunicación de cerveza artesanal en Pittsburgh. Él dice que la asignación de fondos para programas que pueden generar ingresos es clave para las empresas que aún se están recuperando de la pandemia.
"Nuestra factura de electricidad debe pagarse a fin de mes, añadió Guy. Necesito poder ser parte de un programa en el que realmente estás creando activos, un resultado tangible para ese negocio y así puedan estar presentes en unos seis meses"
Pensilvania tiene 1,7 mill millones en dólares del Plan de Rescate Estadounidense no utilizados para gastar hasta 2024.
get more stories like this via email
Today, groups working with lower-income families in Connecticut are raising awareness about the state's "benefits cliff" with a day of action.
The benefits cliff is when a person might get a raise, have a kid with a part-time job, or some other income increase which then makes them ineligible for certain benefits. The changes can have severe impacts on communities and disproportionately affect families with children.
Stephen Monroe Tomczak, professor of social work at Southern Connecticut State University, said it is part of a larger workforce problem.
"People, particularly people of low income, are in a sense disincentivized to participate in the labor force and denied adequate jobs and income when they try to do that," Tomczak explained.
Several General Assembly budget bills could have dealt with the issue but most failed, which inspired today's action, a mock funeral procession to the governor's office to eulogize the bills, including the refundable Child Tax Credit, a housing voucher funding boost bill, and a bill eliminating the asset limit on the HUSKY C medical insurance program.
Social service advocates know the bills will resurface in next year's budget process.
Rose Ferraro, program lead of health justice policy advocacy for the Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut, said people are taking alternate steps like going to food banks or avoiding medical care to cover lost benefits.
"Folks will lose their rental assistance and then, they will sort of have to make some tough decisions," Ferraro noted. "'Do I put food on my table or do I make sure to pay rent?' And, so it becomes a sort of untenable position."
Ferraro added interwoven state and federal funding makes it hard to reach the core of the issues leading to benefits cliffs. One eulogized bill would have established a benefits cliff pilot program. For two years, it would have provided subsistence for people who've reached the benefits cliff.
Disclosure: The Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut contributes to our fund for reporting on Health Issues, Housing/Homelessness, Human Rights/Racial Justice, and Poverty Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
New York towns are reaping many benefits since the Inflation Reduction Act was passed.
Along with funds for larger clean energy projects, the state was awarded $158 million for the IRA's Home Energy Rebates program.
Smaller towns and villages use these grants to implement their climate action plans.
Brighton Town Councilmember Robin Wilt said an IRA grant they applied for will help upgrade the town's HVAC system.
"We will be implementing geothermal and then use a solar array to make the system close to net zero, not quite," said Wilt. "I think we'll get 55% of our energy back with the solar panels."
The bureaucratic process to access the funding was challenging, but some groups are working with the Department of Energy to improve it.
Wilt said feedback on the clean energy projects has been positive. Future projects using IRA funding include increasing walkability and sustainable redevelopment.
Critics have said the IRA includes multiple provisions to increase fossil fuel production.
Towns nationwide are using IRA grants to bolster clean energy projects.
Joel Hicks is a council member for the Borough of Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
They've just applied for a grant to work on energy efficiency and solar projects with Harrisburg. He said this will have positive impacts beyond establishing clean energy.
"We were really excited at this potential," said Hicks, "because we saw that the cost savings we would have for putting in substantial solar projects on our public property would actually fund many of our other public municipal goals."
These include purchasing an electric vehicle fleet and having more efficient solid waste programs.
One thing Hicks said he wants to see in future is state and local governments helping small towns and municipalities with putting together their IRA grant proposals.
get more stories like this via email
A new report analyzes Pennsylvania's existing voucher programs, that divert public funds to private schools.
This comes on the heels of Gov. Josh Shapiro's plan to create a new voucher program for K-12 students.
Diana Polson - senior policy analyst with the Keystone Research Center - said last year's Commonwealth Court decision ruled that Pennsylvania's system of funding public education is unconstitutional, therefore the state doesn't have a dollar to waste on expanding existing private-school voucher programs or creating a new one.
"The basic-education funding commission estimated the state must pay $5.1 billion over the next seven years to make sure our public schools are funded equitably and adequately," said Polson. "Meanwhile, our report finds that existing private-school voucher programs are siphoning millions from taxpayers with little to show for it."
Supporters argue that vouchers let children leave under-performing public schools and get a better education at private schools.
Polson said Pennsylvania's voucher programs have no "meaningful educational or financial accountability," so they really have no way of knowing if these programs operate as intended or are beneficial to low-income or moderate-income students.
Polson said the report reveals that the programs have grown, and just this year they will cost the state nearly $500 million.
However, these voucher programs exclude students in rural areas, because there are few if any participating private schools in these regions.
Local public schools remain the primary option for most rural families.
"We also found that private schools receiving these funds are allowed to - and do - routinely discriminate against students for reasons including disabilities, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and more," said Polson. "These programs are also exclusive. They subsidize the state's most elite and expensive private schools as well as affluent families."
Polson said the report reveals that the Independent Fiscal Office estimated that the average EITC program scholarship was $2,314, while the Opportunity Scholarship Tax Credit was slightly less at around $2,000.
The cost of attending one of the top 25 private schools in Pennsylvania is around $41,000 per year. This means these schools are still out of reach for many low- and moderate-income families.
Disclosure: Keystone Research Center, Inc. contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy & Priorities, Livable Wages/Working Families. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email