Congress is considering a major legislative package that could affect not only investments in climate change but also the affordability of health care. Health-care advocates say it comes not a moment too soon.

One study found that from 1970 to 2020, the average American's health-care costs rose from $1,875 a year to more than $12,500.

Jim Manley, a board member of Consumers for Quality Care, said the main concern is that out-of-pocket costs are too high, according to the group's new poll. He says Arizonans agree they're getting squeezed by health-care costs.

"High deductibles, rising out-of-pocket costs and unpaid medical bills are plaguing American health-care consumers," he said, "with 75% of Arizona voters agreeing that the costs of health care are going up more than other things that they need."

The poll, by Impact Research, found that three out of four American voters believe insurance companies are "nickel-and-diming" their household budgets with out-of-pocket costs.

The U.S. Senate could vote on the package, known as the Inflation Reduction Act, by the end of the week.

Last week, Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., agreed on a bill that allows Medicare to negotiate some drug prices and caps out-of-pocket prescription-drug costs.

Tammy Caputi, a City Council member in Scottsdale, said medical debt is forcing many Arizonans, including her constituents, to cut spending on food and other essentials. She said some even lose their homes or are driven into bankruptcy.

"The general consensus," she said, "is that Congress should cap insurance deductibles, the prescription drug copays and all those other out-of-pocket maximums, to a point that people don't need to skip their care and go into medical debt."

Since no Republicans plan to vote for the bill, Senate Democrats say they'll pass it under the budget reconciliation process but must have all 50 members of their caucus and the vice president vote yes to do so. Passage could hinge on Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., who has yet to reveal how she plans to vote.


get more stories like this via email

With Black History Month underway, Wisconsin researchers and support groups are highlighting the disparities in cases of Alzheimer's disease.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said older Black Americans are about two times more likely than whites to have Alzheimer's and other dementias.

As drugs designed to treat conditions accelerate toward the market, the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health noted Black adults are less likely to be included in the research. The school has made it a priority to focus on the Black population in an ongoing study.

Diane Beckley Milner, director of diversity, equity and inclusion for the Alzheimer's Association Wisconsin Chapter, said participation is important.

"Without us being involved in those clinical trials as Black Americans, then the research, it's not going to lend itself to giving accurate information," Milner pointed out.

The university acknowledged Black individuals can be reluctant to participate in studies, citing historical trauma from events such as the Tuskegee experiment. Officials say when it comes to the UW study, Black volunteers account for 27% of the people enrolled, which is much higher than the state's Black population, suggesting it provides hope in boosting research inclusivity.

Milner emphasized partnerships her group has with organizations such as the African Methodist Episcopal Church can help ease fears and create more awareness within the Black community.

"Having that partnership has proved to be very, very important and critical to making sure that people get information that they can trust," Milner explained.

She added a common challenge her group has found in outreach is many Black Americans view cognitive decline as simply a sign of aging, and not a disease. The association also works with nursing organizations in hopes of educating more people within the Black population.

Preventing maternal and infant mortality in Georgia is a top priority for health care providers in the state.

Georgia already has the nation's highest maternal mortality rate, with more than 46 deaths per 100,000 live births, and ranks 16th for infant mortality.

In Lawrenceville, Obria Medical Clinics has what it calls a Supportive Pregnancy Care program, where people meet monthly in two-hour group sessions during pregnancy.

Robin Mauck, executive director of Obria, said they ask questions, learn how to take their own vital signs, and also meet with their providers for checkups.

"And then, March of Dimes has provided a curriculum that our facilitator goes through that has been proven to reduce maternal mortality," Mauck explained. "The great thing we see in this program is, it creates community for these girls. A lot of them don't have support in the community, they don't have family close by."

Mauck pointed out the group discussions help the participants build confidence, and the clinic also offers resources to help ensure new parents can take the best care of themselves and their babies.

Shelmekia Hodo, maternal and infant health director for the March of Dimes, said her organization is also focused on reducing health inequities in Georgia, with programs to address postpartum care and preterm birth, plus maternal and infant mortality.

One is a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Family Support program, to help improve the experience for new parents. Hodo noted the program has been around for more than 20 years, with more than 70 sites across the country.

"March of Dimes provides an in-house coordinator that is on-site in the NICU, that does patient education with the actual moms, as well as staff education," Hodo outlined. "We know that so many moms are facing so many challenges and barriers having to be away from their babies, with their babies being in the NICU."

She added Georgia took a big step last year to address the maternal mortality rate, by extending Medicaid coverage to low-income mothers to a full year after giving birth, instead of only six months.

With the increasing use of digital devices and computers in daily life, we're all exposed to more and more blue light. They may be convenient and help us stay connected, but prolonged exposure could pose real health risks.

One of those risks is interfering with the body's circadian rhythm, the "internal clock" which regulates a person's sleep cycle. Throwing it off can cause insomnia, headaches and eye strain.

Dr. Joseph Nezgoda, president of the Florida Society of Ophthalmology, said it does not mean a person should completely block out blue light, because a broad spectrum of light is needed throughout the day. But it is important to manage exposure.

"Individuals are just usually on their devices much longer and later than usual," Nezgoda pointed out. "Potentially during those times, it may be good to limit the exposure. Again, there's been convincing data in animal models, but in humans, the jury's still out."

One tip is scheduling an eye exam, others include taking breaks around every 20 minutes from digital screens, by looking at something else at least 20 feet away for 20 seconds. And of course, limit screen times before bed.

Dr. Scott Edmonds, chief eye care officer for UnitedHealthcare Vision, said eye specialists became concerned during the pandemic about blue-light exposure as more people started using digital devices for longer time periods at home. He worries soon, some of the same concerns will surface about blue light that happened with ultraviolet light.

"The photo receptors can certainly process blue light, but it puts a lot of strain on them," Edmonds noted. "We're concerned that over time, the retina will become damaged, and we'll start to see age-related macular degeneration from this, like we did with UV light."

In addition to taking screen breaks, eye-care professionals recommend making sure your computer screens are clear and clean, as researchers continue to study potential dangers.