Ninety-three percent of transgender teens live in a state that has enacted or proposed legislation that would restrict their rights - according to a new report from the Williams Institute at the University of California, Los Angeles's School of Law.

The report looked at six types of laws and policies from this year's legislative session.

Williams Institute Federal Policy Director Elana Redfield is one of the report's authors, and said the Silver State is ahead of many others when it comes to transgender rights and protections.

"Nevada is the only state that has a constitutional protection against discrimination, on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity," said Redfield. "There is an extraordinarily broad protection for LGBTQ people in Nevada, and that is probably why Nevada didn't show up on any of our lists this year."

But Redfield said attempts to limit or ban gender-affirming care for trans-children continue to increase nationwide.

Some in Nevada want to revisit Senate Bill 302, otherwise known as a shield law, which would protect providers of gender-affirming care to minors from legal prosecution by states where such care has been prohibited.

While the measure was vetoed by Gov. Joe Lombardo last year, he did pass other legislation which prevents insurance companies from discriminating against trans people.

Eighty-six percent of transgender and nonbinary youths say debates around anti-trans bills have negatively impacted their mental health, according to The Trevor Project.

Redfield said that despite many state efforts to pass anti-transgender legislation have failed nationwide, that doesn't mean the secondary effects are less harmful.

But she said neighboring states, like Arizona - which have enacted or proposed anti-transgender laws - has been inspirational in unique ways.

"We see a lot of power in state governments, and we see this kind of inspiring example from reproductive rights," said Redfield. "Arizona is a great example of people power and access to reproductive care - but also Kansas, when you see that the attempts to ban gender-affirming care have not been successful, and also attempts to ban abortion have not been successful in Kansas."

Redfield said it is important to highlight that half of all transgender youths in the U.S. live in 14 states and the District of Columbia that have enacted "shield" laws, which protect doctors and parents who have sought gender-affirming care for trans youth.

She added that almost 200,000 trans-teens now live in states that have banned conversion therapy, one of which is Nevada.




get more stories like this via email

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox could sign a bill that would ban LGBTQ+ pride flags from Utah's public schools and government buildings.

The bill's Republican sponsors argue it's all in an effort to encourage political neutrality among government workers and teachers.

Chad Call, executive director with the Utah Pride Center, called the bill "wild government overreach" and unconstitutional.

Call said folks in other communities can use or wear symbols that indicate their values. He said he sees the pride flag being no different.

"Those symbols are largely recognized as free speech in this country," said Call. "This bill is, in our opinion, an infringement on that free speech, especially in the workplace where people have a right to express themselves. We feel like pride flags are in alignment with that."

Call encouraged Cox to veto the bill and consider how many Utahns in the state would be impacted.

Just over 6% of the state's adult population identifies as LGBTQ+, according to UCLA's Williams Institute.

Call argued that Cox and other lawmakers have an obligation to adequately represent all Utahns, not just a select few.

The Utah Pride Festival is taking place on June 7 and 8 in Salt Lake City. The celebration is organized by the Utah Pride Center.

Call said while he doesn't know if Cox will sign HB 77 into law or not, he added that Utah Pride and other local pride celebrations will still take place.

"We will still gather together the first week of June," said Call. "We will still fly our pride flags, even if the city can't join us in that. We will still gather and we will still come together and celebrate something that we have for decades in the state."

As LGBTQ+ plus rights have come under fire across state legislatures, Call said he has a simple message to LGBTQ+ plus folks who may feel discouraged and disappointed with their elected officials.

"Our community is stronger than this," said Call. "Our community has been through challenges and situations like this in the past. It doesn't make them OK, but it does make us a resilient and strong community."

Gov. Kim Reynolds has signed a measure that removes gender identity protections for LGBTQ+ people from Iowa's civil rights code. Opponents call it "mean spirited."

Senate File 418 makes Iowa the first state in the country to remove civil rights protections for a group of people who have been protected by law, taking the words "gender identity" out of its code.

Anne Discher, executive director of the group Common Good Iowa, said the measure belies Iowa's open-minded reputation and sends the wrong message to the rest of the nation.

"Basically, it is saying that it's OK to discriminate against trans people in the workplace, in housing, in school and in their financial lives," Discher explained.

Supporters of the measure, which was the first bill Reynolds signed in 2025, said including gender identity in Iowa's civil rights code threatens "common sense" laws banning transgender participation in sports and clarify who can use which public restrooms. Iowa passed its Civil Rights Act in 1965.

Hundreds of protesters rallied against the bill at the Statehouse in Des Moines before Reynolds signed it. Discher argued Iowa lawmakers are not representing their constituents.

"I really firmly believe this bill does not reflect the true beliefs of most Iowans," Discher stressed. "I think it's
incredibly more extreme than Iowans truly are in their hearts."

If it is not challenged in court, the measure is scheduled to take effect July 1.


get more stories like this via email

A coalition of New Mexico groups is supporting a bill this session to require "Comprehensive Human Sexuality Education" for public school students.

New Mexico is among 40 states to require sex-education instruction but according to Planned Parenthood, there is no guarantee the instruction is high quality or covers topics young people need to stay healthy, including information about HIV.

Nathan Saavedra, program manager for Equality New Mexico, said Senate Bill 258 would require sex education curricula is medically accurate.

"Our hope mostly is to save lives," Saavedra emphasized. "We know that sex education does save lives and it improves the health of all youth. It decreases bullying and harassment. Sex education is harm reduction, from our perspective."

In addition to Equality New Mexico, the state's ACLU organization and the New Mexico Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs support the more comprehensive approach. By contrast, last fall the Florida Department of Education ordered local school districts teaching sex education to promote abstinence and exclude discussion of contraception.

Saavedra noted many students, including those who are LGBTQ+, do not know what they should be doing to protect themselves and would benefit from discussions covering sexual orientation and gender identity.

"We're trying to get the point across and the law in place so those students no longer have to feel less than, or know less than, their peers," Saavedra stressed.

New Mexico's current standards for sex education surpass many other states but access is often dependent on where a student lives. As written, the bill would provide resources to rural and smaller districts to launch comprehensive programs. The proposed legislation still would allow parents to exempt their children from the sex-ed portion of required health courses.