Federal workers are voicing concerns about what they see as the potential impacts of the sweeping policy recommendations known as Project 2025, if Donald Trump is reelected in November.

Although the former president has denied being associated with the 900-page document created by the Heritage Foundation, some parts of his platform are similar and its contributors include dozens of members of his presidential administration.

Jacqueline Simon, policy director for the American Federation of Government Employees, said every government agency, from Homeland Security to the Department of Agriculture, would be affected. She is convinced many federal workers would lose their jobs if the administration plans to privatize agencies.

"There's a misconception that most federal employees live and work in the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area," Simon explained. "The truth is that 85% of federal employees work elsewhere around the country. And Texas actually has a very large concentration of federal employees, who work on military bases and in VA hospitals."

Project 2025 proposes reviving what is known as the Trump "Schedule F" policy, an effort to reclassify tens of thousands of federal workers as political appointees.

Sherita Smith, president of the union's Local 252, representing members in the Department of Education, which would be on the chopping block under Project 2025, said the changes would affect everything from Head Start to summer food programs, to the student loan division for higher education.

"If you are seeking higher education and don't have, at your disposal, $70,000 extra to pay for it, it is going to be critical that we keep the U.S. Department of Education," Smith contended. "Certainly if you are a school district that relies on federal funding, I don't know how public educators are going to be able to do their work."

Johnny Jones, secretary-treasurer of the union's Council 100, representing members in the Transportation Security Administration, said Project 2025 outlines cutbacks to revert airport security back to what it was before the 9/11 terror attacks.

"If you remember what happened on September 11th, and what happened in the days after September 11th, you should always remember that this is what happens when you privatize a national security function," Jones emphasized. "We cannot go back to that, we do not want to have anything like 9/11 to occur again. It is a very dangerous thought process."

Project 2025 was written by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. The Foundation said Trump would be under no obligation to implement its recommendations if he is elected.

Texas lawmakers will return to Austin on July 21 for a special legislative session called by Gov. Greg Abbott.

The 18 items on the agenda include redrawing congressional maps. Redistricting usually occurs every 10 years, following the census, but Abbott added the item to the agenda after the Department of Justice drew attention to four Democratic seats.

Christina Sanders, founder of the nonprofit PoliChic Engagement Fund, said Texas maps are already caught up in litigation.

"Some of the court cases that are still even pending from the maps that have not been drawn fairly and the potential impact of new maps in the middle of a census cycle," Sanders explained.

The Biden administration sued Texas, alleging the state's legislative and congressional district maps discriminate against Latino and Black voters. The Justice Department, under President Donald Trump, withdrew from the lawsuit earlier this year.

The seats targeted by the Justice Department are held by Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, Rep. Sylvia Garcia, D-Texas, and Rep. Marc Veasey, D-Texas. They are also focused on the vacant seat previously held by late Congressman Sylvester Turner. Following the 2023 legislative session, Abbott called four special sessions to pass a school voucher bill, which failed.

Sanders feels Abbott is using special sessions to push personal agendas.

"A special session would be for something like the flood that just occurred," Sanders argued. "It would be something that there is an emergency -- something immediate needs to happen at this moment -- because this policy for the state cannot wait."

Flood warning systems and communication are also on the agenda, along with hemp and THC legislation and changes to the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness test.

With the Independence Day holiday weekend here, North Dakotans might be out at parades, fireworks shows and barbecues. However, new polling indicates that many Americans are struggling to feel optimistic about the state of the country.

A new Gallup survey shows 58% of U.S. adults say they're proud to be an American. While there are some partisan splits, the overall percentage is a record low for the annual poll question.

Barbara Headrick, president of the League of Women Voters of North Dakota, said it's not surprising, given the sharp divides between the two major parties. But she feels there's something else at play.

"There is still an after effect, I believe, from the pandemic from that separation from each other that we had," she said.

That the pandemic was so politicized is another complicating factor that prevented the country from healing, Headrick said, adding that it's understandable some Americans are very concerned about various rights being taken away. However, she noted the U.S. has deep flaws throughout its history, and there are still many more rights afforded today than in past decades.

If heated rhetoric clouding U.S. politics has got you down, Headrick said, you can still show American pride through actions.

"Find a way to love your country by making it better," she said.

Headrick said it can involve showing support for civil workers or volunteering at a local homeless or animal shelter. She added that expressing pride through elections doesn't just involve voting, noting that there are opportunities to stay informed about how your local government is addressing pressing issues, such as affordable housing.


get more stories like this via email

A new Indiana law, starting today, allows school board candidates to list their political affiliation on the ballot.

Candidates may choose to register with a political party, as independents or not disclose any affiliation. Those who do not select will have a blank space next to their name and straight-ticket voting will not apply to school board races. Those opposed to the new law said it injects unnecessary politics into a role traditionally focused on education.

Leslie Jacobs, a school board member for the Fayette County School Corporation in Connersville, is against the new law.

"In my 10 years, I couldn't tell you the political leanings of anybody on my board. Never comes up," Jacobs explained. "Our discussions are purely about educational opportunities, picking a superintendent, looking at budget."

She warned requiring party labels might discourage qualified candidates from running. Supporters of the new law said it increases transparency.

Jennifer Blackburn, a school board member for the East Allen County Schools near Fort Wayne, also opposes the new law.

"The scenario that there are four candidates potentially running and three are Democrat, one is a Republican -- this last school board election -- none of us were opposed," Blackburn pointed out. "As big as our county is, there are not a lot of people running."

The law will first affect school board elections in November.


get more stories like this via email