Kentuckians head to the polls in a few weeks and on the ballot is Amendment 2, a proposed change to the state Constitution to allow public funds for vouchers to pay tuition at private schools.

A group of county school superintendents across the Commonwealth opposes the measure, arguing it would funnel public dollars to schools with little to no accountability to taxpayers.

Tom Shelton, executive secretary of the group, the Council for Better Education, said other states to have passed similar amendments have a track record showing they worsen outcomes for students, widen inequality gaps and cause already struggling public schools to cut resources and staff.

"That's actually the main reason we oppose this issue," Shelton explained. "The data that we've seen from other states is clear that this is bad policy."

According to the Kentucky Center for Economic Policy, Amendment 2 would hit the state's poorest rural areas the hardest, communities where public schools are also large employers. Supporters of the ballot measure argued it would increase opportunities for school choice for parents who could not otherwise afford private schools.

Shelton pointed out Kentucky's public schools are woefully underfunded and have stayed afloat despite a $2 billion budget shortfall since the mid 2000s. He added voucher money for private schools often does not affect those who need it the most.

"On average, 70-75% of the money goes to students who are already in private schools," Shelton emphasized. "It doesn't really increase private school enrollment and it doesn't take kids out of public schools."

This year alone, legislators in 29 states have proposed 80 bills tied to school vouchers, Education Savings Accounts, refundable tax credits and tax-credit scholarships.


get more stories like this via email

By Kyla Russell for WISH-TV.
Broadcast version by Joe Ulery for Indiana News Service reporting for the WISH-TV-Free Press Indiana-Public News Service Collaboration

Congress has slashed a decades-old federal medical funding program by more than half.

The Indiana University School of Medicine could be one of the hardest organizations hit.

In 2023, the school was awarded $715,000 from the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (CDRMP). As the largest medical school in the U.S., the university was tasked with using the money to improve treatment for mild traumatic brain injuries.

In March, Congress passed a bill that cuts the funding by 57%. The move is leaving doctors worried.

"I'm involved with the entire athletic department, which certainly includes the football team," Dr. Nicholas Port, an IU optometry professor, said recently. "I am quite involved in and was at practice today."

In addition to teaching and several other responsibilities, Post helps care for the school's top athletes. He also specializes in treating traumatic brain injuries.

"The CDRMP is a congressionally mandated research program in the Department of Defense," Port said. "It's been around for at least a decade or two, maybe more, and they fund biomedical research that is relevant to the mission of the Department of Defense."

Under the program, the Department of Defense had $1.5 billion in 2024. That money was dispersed to researchers from across the country.

After Congress cut that budget to $650 million, researchers feared their funding will be cut.

"Well, grants are already very competitive, so they're only funding well less than 10% of the proposals that are submitted each cycle each year," Port said. "There will be fewer grants by 50% or less, so they may only fund 40% of what they funded last year."

Port says they've received little communication about the future of the funding.

Traces of the federal program have started to vanish. The program's web page reads "page not found." It once listed the many research programs it funded.

"That will have direct impact on patient care and a direct impact on developing tools and clinical interventions," Port said. "In my case, we have two clinical trial proposals that we're working on proposing. Our chances of getting those funded will go down tremendously."

Several other organizations in Indiana receive a small amount of CDMRP funding. The change means they too may have less opportunity to get funding through the program.


Kyla Russell wrote this article for WISH-TV.


get more stories like this via email

A new bill in Sacramento would dramatically raise K-12 school funding targets by 50% over ten years. Assembly Bill 477 is intended to help districts raise educators' pay, to attract more people to the profession and keep them there.

Grace Consentino is a middle-school science teacher in Novato.

"My commute every day is a total of one hour and 30 minutes. I would love to be able to live in the town that I work in, but I live in a separate county because the cost of living is so high," she said. "This is why teachers leave."

A recent study on the state of education in California found one in three new educators is seriously thinking about leaving, mostly because of low pay. The bill would hike the local control funding formula.

Opponents say they are concerned about cost. The Assembly Appropriations Committee has not yet completed a fiscal analysis.

Dannel Montesano is a longtime attendance clerk in the Galt Joint Union School District.

"Starting paraprofessional pay in my district is $18.63 an hour, while down the street at McDonald's, the starting pay is over $20 an hour. So, our schools are suffering from constant turnover and staffing issues," Montesano said.

California is bracing for a big hit to the state budget, as tax receipts are expected to be lower. In addition, Congress has proposed billions in cuts to Medi-Cal. And the administration has threatened to pull federal funding from schools that promote diversity, equity and inclusion.

Assemblymember Al Muratsuchi, D-Torrance, sponsored the bill, which went before the Assembly Education Committee on Wednesday.

"The Trump administration is attempting to dismantle public education and defund our schools. California must fight back to defend public education," he said.


get more stories like this via email

After several weeks of public comment, bills addressing school finance in Texas will be presented to the House of Representatives.

House Bill 2 is the public school funding bill and Senate Bill 2 is the voucher proposal, along with its companion bill, House Bill 3.

Chandra Villanueva, director of policy and advocacy for the group Every Texan, said the proposed voucher initiative, which would provide students $10,000 to help pay for private school, would hurt public schools and low-income families.

"Our schools are funded based on attendance, so when kids leave the system, the schools will get less money," Villanueva explained. "Until you can actually close a campus, you still have all of your same fixed costs around utilities, teachers. You'll see more overcrowded classrooms."

Backers of school vouchers, including Gov. Greg Abbott, have said public schools will not be negatively affected. This is the second legislative session where Abbott has made a voucher program his top priority.

Teachers, advocacy groups and even members of the Republican Party have spoken out against vouchers. Many Texas teachers spent their spring break testifying before the legislative committee. Villanueva emphasized although the proposal is out of committee, they are not giving up.

"Members need to hear from their constituents," Villanueva stressed. "The public education committee has been targeted the most -- but even now, if your member is not on that committee, they're going to be the ones who are hearing this bill. And a lot of amendments are going to be offered up on the House floor. So that's an opportunity to try to limit the voucher, try to put more guardrails on it."

Both bills are expected to be brought to the House floor at the same time, but a date has not been set.


get more stories like this via email