Charleston, WV – Stubbing out cigarettes indoors at public places doesn't stub out the bottom-line profits of businesses like bars and restaurants, nor does it cause them to lay off workers.

As local health authorities have pushed for indoor smoking bans in some parts of West Virginia, there's been concern about the effects such bans could have on businesses in the hospitality industry. This month, however, a new study published in the journal Prevention Science could ease some of the economic fears.

Its lead author, Liz Klein, is a professor of health behavior at Ohio State University. Smoking ban laws have been passed in recent years in several states, counties and towns, she says, which made it possible to determine how the hospitality industry has fared.

"The take-home message from this is, we didn't find that there was any significant effect on employment in bars and restaurants."

According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, exposure to secondhand smoke increases nonsmokers' risks of developing lung cancer and heart disease. Klein says the research on the health benefits of making workplaces smoke-free is solid, and she hopes the study helps bar and restaurant owners who want to protect workers' health, but are concerned about losing business.

"Enacting these comprehensive clean indoor air policies provides the greatest public health benefit, and didn't produce any sort of significant economic effect."

Bar owners in particular have claimed smoking bans would hurt their business. Critics of the study say it did not look at the profit-loss sheets for bars and restaurants, although Klein points out that profit-loss reporting methods vary widely in the industry and would not be valid forms of research data. She claims the staffing level is a more accurate indicator, because jobs are added and/or cut quickly in these types of businesses, based on their economic situation.




get more stories like this via email

Nebraska needs to do better when it comes to tobacco use prevention and cessation, according to a newly released report.

In the American Lung Association's 2024 State of Tobacco Control report, Nebraska received an "F" in three of the five areas rated. One is for tobacco prevention and cessation funding.

Michael Seilback, national assistant vice president for state public policy for the American Lung Association, said Nebraska is spending vastly less than what the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends.

"The fact is that the state is taking in these dollars, and we're saying, reinvest just some of them," Seilback explained. "You can easily meet CDC best practices with tens of millions of dollars to spare."

The report showed Nebraska's tobacco-related revenue is nearly $98 million per year. However, for fiscal year 2024, state funding for tobacco control programs is less than $4 million.

On the bright side, the state received an "A" for smoke-free air.

Responding to the report, a spokesperson with the Public Information Office at the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services pointed to the Nebraska Quitline. It has received more than 100,000 calls since 2000, with Quitline users six to 10 times more likely to still have quit after seven months than those who try to quit cold turkey. The Nebraska Quitline number is 1-800-784-8669, and 1-800-355-3569 for Spanish speakers. Web-based coaching and texting and free "quit medication starter kits" are also available.

The state also received an "F" for tobacco taxes. Seilback called the state's cigarette tax of 64 cents per pack extremely low and supports Gov. Jim Pillen's proposal to increase it by as much as $2 per pack. He added the American Lung Association always pushes for increased tobacco tax dollars to be used for prevention and control and helping people quit.

"To be clear, even if not one dollar was spent -- and we wouldn't encourage it -- on its own, just increasing the price has an impact on the amount of people that use it," Seilback pointed out. "Increasing that price would help prevent kids from starting."

Nebraska's third "F" is on flavored tobacco products, as a result of having no state laws or restrictions.

Seilback commended the state for participating in the multistate lawsuit against e-cigarette manufacturer, JUUL Labs, with the settlement money going to programs to curb addiction.


get more stories like this via email

Widespread vaping among young Kentuckians continues to be a public health concern - and some local communities are coming up with innovative ways to tackle the issue. A big win in the battle against nicotine came when the Commonwealth raised the age limit to purchase nicotine products to 21.

Lauren Carr, director of the Graves County Agency for Substance Abuse Policy and Prevention, said local shops are still selling vapes to kids. Her county is incentivizing business owners not to sell to minors.

"We reward the clerks that do not sell with a gift card," she said. "So we say, 'Hey, thank you for not selling to the kids. Because that is preventing it from getting into the schools.'"

Experts say tobacco retail licensing can help protect youth from the harmful effects of vaping and can also improve equity among low-income and communities of color, often targeted by the tobacco industry.

According to Kentucky Youth Advocates, about 35 states require retailers to hold a license to sell tobacco products, but Kentucky is not one of them.

Sydney Shafer, a high school student in Scott County, said after her grandfather passed away from lung cancer, she became passionate about raising awareness among state lawmakers about the harms of vaping.

"Big vape companies are targeting younger audiences with fun flavors, like cotton candy and coffee," she argued. "It's deceptive and manipulative, and I would just want to educate other people and let them know that vaping is not as safe as they think."

Bruce Crouch, drug prevention officer with the Youth Coalition Prevention Group at Taylor County High School, said his school district recently received an opioid settlement grant from the state to expand drug prevention work.

"We actually started with our intermediate school, with fourth-graders," Crouch reported. "And we introduced a program, the 'Too Good for Drugs' program. So, they are actually getting that early education about the dangers of nicotine use."

Research from the CDC and FDA finds more than 2.5 million middle and high school students nationwide reported e-cigarette use in 2022. Nearly 85% of youth who vape used flavored e-cigarettes, and more than half used disposable e-cigarettes.


get more stories like this via email

The Food and Drug Administration will be releasing guidance on its proposed menthol cigarette ban by month's end. In Virginia, these cigarettes make up 45% of the state's menthol cigarette market.

Several states - including California, New York and Rhode Island - have implemented menthol bans in recent years. As beneficial as this move may be for people's health, law enforcement officials aren't as celebratory.

Diane Goldstein, executive director of the Law Enforcement Action Partnership, said the only kind of ban that would work is no ban at all.

"I don't care if it's a tobacco product, a caffeine product, an alcohol product, or the unregulated illicit market that we currently have," she said. "People are always going to find a way to get the drugs that they want."

She noted that enforcing such a ban could be problematic for already disenfranchised communities. The FDA has said its new proposal won't penalize individual smokers - rather, it will penalize distributors. The hope is the ban will improve health across the state and the nation, especially as Virginia ranked poorly in the American Lung Association's 2023 State of Tobacco Control Report.

Goldstein said she feels there should be additional studies done before the proposed rules are finalized to ensure that disenfranchised communities with higher smoking rates won't be so harshly affected. She described the kind of approach she'd want to see taken as part of a ban.

"You have policies that have been in place for years, that include, we need more harm-reduction in the state products for adults," she said. "We need more education, we need better cessation support, we need better youth tobacco prevention."

An analysis of several studies by Quit Now Virginia found that 25% to 64% of adult smokers would quit if menthol cigarettes were banned in the United States.