CHICAGO - In the age of mobile phones, laptops and tablets, privacy experts have warned that government and commercial entities are able to monitor and collect data on almost anyone. International experts will gather at a conference today at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law to teach students and journalists how to keep their communications confidential and their personal information free from threat.

Distinguished Professor of Law Lori Andrews said we live in a spy state where Americans often are perceived by their digital doppelganger.

"I think people don't realize how really important things - life insurance, credit, whether they get a kidney or not in a transplant - may depend on some misimpression that has come from information collected by marketing entities based on where people go on the web," Andrews said.

The Edward Snowden revelations regarding National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance activities brought to light the ways U.S. government agencies may have violated Americans' right to privacy. Some have defended the activities as critical to fighting terrorism, while others argue it is an enormous violation of constitutional rights.

Beatrice Edwards is a legal representative of Snowden in the U.S. and executive director of the Government Accountability Project. She will speak at the conference and says intrusions on First Amendment rights are particularly concerning for journalists.

"A lot of Americans say, 'Well, I'm not a terrorist, so I don't care.' If you think it doesn't matter to you that you are under surveillance all the time, then you really haven't thought about it long enough, because what it means is there's no more free press," Edwards said.

The U.S. fell 13 places - to 46 out of 180 countries - in the World Press Freedom Index for 2014.

Andrews said threats to freedom of the press are troubling, because journalists are taking risks to tell the public things about government that government does not want people to know. And she said whistleblowers need to be protected for the greater good of society.

"The First Amendment - the right to publish, the right to free speech - is critical in a democracy because you've got to have this marketplace of ideas to decide important issues as a citizen. We are all at risk because of the surreptitious surveying of us over the web," Andrews added.

Andrews proposed that there be a social network constitution, to ensure that the rights Americans have offline, such as freedom of speech and the right to privacy, are also the same rights they have online.

More information on the conference is available at www.themediaconsortium.org.




get more stories like this via email

House lawmakers have passed a bill advocates said will be harmful to nonprofits in New York and nationwide.

House Resolution 9495 passed with a 219-184 vote after failing to get a two-thirds majority in the chamber last week. The bill gives the Treasury Secretary power to rescind tax-exempt status for nonprofits considered "terrorist supporting organizations." On its first vote, it had strong bipartisan support.

Jeff Ordower, U.S. Lead for the group 350 Action, said President-elect Donald Trump's rhetoric about "the enemy within" makes this bill's return troubling.

"They are trying to consolidate the number of tools in their toolbox," Ordower contended. "So they can move quickly to call some people the enemy within and shut down organizations that are supporting causes that are unpopular, supporting causes that are fighting corporate power, fighting structural racism."

Voting in favor of the bill were 15 Democrats, including Rep. Tom Suozzi, D-N.Y. It could be due to its other provision giving tax breaks to Americans wrongfully imprisoned abroad or held hostage by terror groups. Ordower noted it is the result of a push by groups who want Israel and Gaza's status quo before Oct. 7 restored, which aid organizations could jeopardize.

Beyond public concern, some experts feel the bill's primary goal is helping President-elect Trump consolidate power within the Executive Branch. Ordower pointed out it is one of the many battles with the second Trump Administration about what defines a healthy and sustainable democracy.

"What we need in order to really have a good fight that defends civil society, that leads us towards and continues some of the ways that are flourishing democracy is to have lots and lots of groups that are able to push their agendas, and not just groups with particular ideologies or point of views doing that," Ordower stressed.

Ordower is surprised by lawmaker's persistence to pass this bill given wars occurring across the world, as well as ongoing economic, climate and immigration issues at home. Some 150 groups including the ACLU signed a letter to House lawmakers urging them to oppose the measure.

The Indiana Chamber of Commerce outlined six key priorities for lawmakers ahead of the legislative session in January.

Rather than releasing detailed policy positions, the Chamber emphasized broad focus areas, including workforce, education, economic growth, infrastructure, quality of place and community health.

Phil GiaQuinta, D-Fort Wayne, House Minority Leader, responded to the Chamber's priorities, highlighting the need to address child care as a factor in economic development.

"We talk about economic development with things that impact economic development here in the state. Child care is really one of those," GiaQuinta contended.

The organization stressed the critical role of affordable child care in workforce development, citing a report estimating Indiana loses $4.2 billion annually, including $1.7 billion in tax revenue due to child care challenges. High costs force some parents out of the workforce, straining the state's economy.

Statehouse leaders acknowledged the issue but differ on solutions. Democrats argued child care deserves more state investment, while Republican leaders believe the private sector should play a larger role.

Todd Huston, R-Fishers, Speaker of the House, said businesses should not expect the state to solve their child care problems entirely.

"They've done a lot of different things to try to support families and young families. We will continue to do that," Huston stated. "But I think we also have to set a level of expectations that we're not going to; the state's not going to be funding all universal pre-K."

The Chamber plans to release detailed policy proposals in January, aiming to guide lawmakers toward strategies to strengthen Indiana's economy and workforce.


get more stories like this via email

North Dakota is no stranger to public pension debates. States face pressure to keep retirement systems well-funded and new data show most Americans place great value on such benefits for both government and private-sector workers.

According to the National Institute on Retirement Security, 86% of Americans believe all workers, not just those employed by state and local governments, should have a pension. There are similar approval levels when asked how important public pensions are in recruiting teachers and public safety workers.

Dan Doonan, executive director of the institute, suggested it is not too surprising to see the results.

"Pensions, along with other benefits, are part of creating that culture of careers and not jobs," Doonan explained.

Starting in January, North Dakota will close its main public pension plan for new hires, who will instead be offered a 401(k)-style benefit. The move followed debate over whether it was the right way to address a $1.9 billion unfunded liability. Backers argued it protects benefits for existing workers and taxpayers but skeptics contended it makes it harder to attract workers to the public sector.

Doonan noted the survey results overlap with the idea maintaining an experienced public-sector workforce is a good thing for community members and not just the employee and employer.

"In general, when public services are done well, they're often invisible, right?" Doonan emphasized. "We want good roads, we want safe communities, and I think Americans understand the role of having career public servants in terms of delivering those outcomes."

The Bureau of Labor Statistics said state and local governments employ about 20 million workers, which represents about 13% of the U.S. workforce.