FARMVILLE, Va. - A small, local election on Tuesday is the first time Virginia voters will have to show a photo I.D. as required by a new law.

The Farmville town council election in Prince Edward and Cumberland counties represents the first time any of the commonwealth's voters will have to present a photo I.D. to cast a ballot.

Anne Sterling, president of the the League of Women Voters of Virginia, says her organization is concerned many Virginians haven't considered what they'll need to prove their identity at the polls. She says they're especially worried about the oldest and youngest voters.

"Elderly people often let their driver's licenses expire or their passports expire," says Sterling. "And plenty of people 18 and older don't get a driver's license."

Sterling stresses anyone who has questions about Tuesday's election should contact their voter registration office, or go to Board of Elections website at sbe.Virginia.gov.

Virginia's new voter I.D. law requires voters to present a driver's license or passport, a veteran, work or college I.D., or similar government identification. Sterling stresses the I.D. has to have a photo, and can't be more than a year out of date. She says if a voter's I.D. has expired, the voter can get one from the voter registrar during office hours - but Sterling urges people not wait to deal with the issue.

"If it became expired longer ago than twelve months, it will not be accepted," she says. "Those voters will want to act now, while they still have time."

One estimate puts the number of Virginia voters without a Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) issued I.D. at 300,000. While the law's supporters say it will stop people from voting under someone else's name, critics of the law charge that kind of voter fraud is exceptionally rare.

According to Sterling, the issue is still in flux - some rules have just been set and the law itself may be subject to court challenges. She says it's a confusing situation, made more confusing since the Farmville election is the only one of four upcoming elections in the commonwealth where the new law will apply.

"The new law will not apply in the other three elections. I believe those are for the House of Delegates," she says.


get more stories like this via email

Legislative bills on housing have seen mixed results in Montana so far this session.

A state nonprofit group held an online training on how to provide public comment about those bills - aimed at young people, for whom affordable housing is a major challenge.

Montana's population grew by over 36,000 people between 2020 and early 2024, creating massive housing shortages and skyrocketing prices.

Sage Bennett, housing organizer with the advocacy group Forward Montana, said providing written comments on bills or verbal comments during hearings can help expand others' worldviews.

"You don't have to be a policy expert to share testimony," said Bennett. "That's what our elected officials are there to understand. And we are there to provide comment, to be able to have them understand the real world impacts that these policies have on us."

Housing-related bills working their way through the Legislature include one to amend zoning laws to allow taller buildings, and another to establish a grant program to create permanent supportive housing for people dealing with homelessness.

A bill to provide some renters the first right to buy a property if their landlord intends to sell was tabled last week.

Those who want to comment online must create an account and register for a bill hearing at least two hours in advance.

Forward Montana's State Legislative Coordinator John Bazant said commenters should come prepared, but be flexible, as time allotments for comments may change.

"This one-minute warning beep can be pretty jarring and it will probably interrupt you," said Bazant. "And then because it can depend on how long they give you for your testimony, having a long version and a short version is a ton of help."

According to the Montana Budget and Policy Center, workers paid the state's $10.55 minimum wage would have to work 80 to 90 hours per week to afford fair-market rent for a two-bedroom apartment in Flathead, Gallatin, Missoula, and three other counties.

The Missouri House Committee on Elections is reviewing key legislation that could shape the state's voting process.

Proposals include expanding early voting and granting poll challengers greater access to voting locations.

One of the most significant proposed bills would make it a felony to threaten election officials, such as judges, clerks, and even poll workers.

Last October, Eastern Missouri's U.S. Attorney's Office appointed District Election Officers to address threats, voting complaints, and fraud. State Rep. Peggy McGaugh - R-Carrollton - is the bill's sponsor.

"They have been the victims of just some harmful things to their jobs and their security," said McGaugh. "And so I just need to protect them. People can do some hateful things, and so I needed to get a provision out there, that they would be safe."

Opponents of this type of legislation argue it could violate First Amendment rights, claiming it might criminalize not just threats but also protected political speech.

Rep. McGaugh highlighted that Missouri's elections have, for the most part, stayed out of the national spotlight - avoiding the turmoil seen in other states.

She credited this stability to the strong collaboration among election officials at all levels of the process.

"You don't hear about the pulling up to the courthouse with vans full of boxes with ballots - all the fraud," said McGaugh, "because we don't do that in Missouri. "

A 2024 survey by the Brennan Center for Justice found that 27% of local election officials knew colleagues who resigned over safety concerns, up from 18% in 2023, and nearly 20% may leave before the 2026 midterm elections.

Support for this reporting was provided by Carnegie Corporation of New York.




get more stories like this via email

Community groups are coming together to expand voting rights to all Connecticut residents.

The Connecticut Right to Vote Campaign says it aims to ensure all lawful permanent residents would be able to vote, as well as encourage them to turn out for local, state and federal elections.

The campaign's centerpiece is HJ 26, a bill that would allow lawful permanent residents to vote.

Helen Quinonez, a community organizer with Make the Road Connecticut, said the campaign and bill have widespread support.

"We don't have only the support from the community who are not able to vote now; we have the support from the community who actually can vote," she said. "But we need to increase the vote participation in Connecticut, because a lot of people don't go to vote in local, municipal elections."

Despite support for the campaign and the bill, Quinonez acknowledged it may take five years to accomplish their goals, given the current political climate. As President Donald Trump continues to support mass deportations, groups working for immigrants' rights want Connecticut lawmakers to bolster state immigration laws to better protect residents.

A crux of the campaign will center on using voting rights in local and municipal elections. State data show declines in voter turnout across local and federal elections.

Ariana Fernandez, a community organizer with United Parents and Students, said educating people about voting will be a big part of their efforts - helping them understand the importance in their own lives of being able to vote.

"The biggest way to have a voice in their child's education is through a vote and deciding who represents whatever education matters that affect their children," she said. "So, as an example, the Board of Education - and we know during these local elections, there's a lot of parents who are left out of that voting process."

She pointed out if people who live and work in the state can't vote, it's a form of taxation without representation. It's estimated that immigrants in Connecticut contribute more than $406 million a year in taxes to the state's economy.