AUSTIN, Texas - A federal judge has found that the "reckless conduct" of BP caused the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, which left 11 people dead and became the largest environmental disaster in U.S. history.

Thursday's ruling concluded that the massive spill in 2010 was the result of "gross negligence or willful misconduct" by BP, and that the oil giant bears the majority of the responsibility.

Amander Fuller, Texas policy specialist for Gulf of Mexico restoration at the National Wildlife Federation, called the ruling a step toward justice.

"(U.S. District Court) Judge (Carl) Barbier clearly saw what the rest of us saw, in that BP was grossly negligent in their actions in the Gulf," she said. "Hopefully, this means we're on the path to good ecosystem-scale restoration of the region, for now and future generations."

The gross negligence ruling, along with a pending determination by the judge on how many barrels of oil were spilled, will be used when penalties are levied for violations of the Clean Water Act. That phase of the trial is set to begin in late January.

The fines could cost BP upwards of $17 billion, money Fuller said is vital to the continued recovery from the catastrophe, in Texas and other states along the Gulf.

"Eighty percent of that money is going to go into something called the RESTORE Act, our Gulf restoration trust fund," she said, "which then gets funneled down to the states in five different ways, to protect and restore the Gulf of Mexico environment and economy."

BP said it strongly disagrees with Thursday's decision and will immediately appeal. The conduct of the two other parties involved in the spill, Transocean and Halliburton, was ruled to be negligent.

The text of the ruling is online at laed.uscourts.gov. BP's statement in response is at bp.com. More information on the RESTORE Act is at blog.nwf.org.


get more stories like this via email

Beneath the glow of Miami's streetlights and the towering skyline, a rare species of bat clings to survival.

The Florida bonneted bat, one of the most endangered bats in the United States, faces mounting threats from urbanization and habitat loss.

Mylea Bayless, chief of strategic partnerships for the group Bat Conservation International, said conservation organizations are racing against time to protect the species and its fragile habitat.

"The largest population and the most dense population is right around Zoo Miami, which is right in the city of Miami," Bayless explained. "These bats really are endangered neighbors for many of the people that live in Miami, eating insects as they fly over the city at night."

There have been glimmers of hope. Last year, Miami-Dade County reversed a plan to build a water park near Zoo Miami, preserving a critical foraging area for the bats. Beyond habitat loss, the species faces additional challenges, including pesticide use and pollution, which threaten the native insects the bats rely on for food.

Bayless recalled a recent rally near Zoo Miami where she said hundreds of people showed up on a rainy Saturday to show support for the bonneted bats. They voiced concern about the Pine Rocklands, an endangered habitat the bats rely on, along with 23 federally protected species living there as well.

"The community of Miami really came out in force to advocate for the protection of Florida bonneted bats and their habitats," Bayless recounted. "We were really encouraged by all of the community support we received."

Bayless emphasized the need for long-term collaborations to protect the Pine Rocklands habitats and urges the public to appreciate their surroundings, highlighting the rare chance to spot an endangered Florida bonneted bat.


get more stories like this via email

Conservationists in New York and nationwide will celebrate the 51st anniversary of the Endangered Species Act on Saturday.

Since its passage in 1973, more than 1,600 species in the U.S. have been protected by the law. New York's piping plover and numerous other grassland birds have seen their populations rebound and backers credit this legislation.

Susan Holmes, executive director of the Endangered Species Coalition, said bald eagles are a great example of the law's conservation impacts.

"There are, in New York State, 425 breeding pairs, which means that if you're taking the Amtrak north to say Croton or going north along the Hudson, there's a good chance that you'll see a bald eagle," Holmes pointed out. "All of this is thanks to the Endangered Species Act."

As beneficial as the law may be, barriers prevent it from working to its fullest extent. Holmes noted the biggest issue has been getting sufficient funding. This year, advocates asked Congress to raise its funding by more than $840 million, which would fully fund the program. The amount would ensure each species has at least $101,000 for conservation and protection efforts.

Beyond funding, Holmes feels more people getting involved in wildlife conservation can help strengthen the law. When it first passed, it had overwhelming bipartisan support from Congress and the public. Though public support for the Endangered Species Act remains high, Holmes noted lawmakers' support has waned.

"We've seen some polarization around the Endangered Species Act itself," Holmes observed. "That's not reflected by the public's concern for wildlife nor the public support for the law. So, I think it's true, we are not seeing the same kind of support among Republicans for endangered species protection that we saw back in 1973."

She added it applies more to elected officials who are Republicans than the party's voters. For 2025, Holmes stressed threats from climate change and habitat loss will linger but she hopes there will be a recommitment to fully funding the Endangered Species Act to ensure more threatened plants and animals are able to thrive.

The United States has a national mammal, tree and flower but the status of America's most treasured bird was not always so clear officially or ecologically until now.

Last week, the bald eagle officially became the national bird of the U.S. More than 50 years ago, pesticide use had decimated bald eagle populations. Researchers recorded the lowest number of nesting pairs in 1963, at just 417.

Aimee Delach, senior policy analyst at Defenders of Wildlife, said pesticides like DDT worked their way up the food chain in a process known as biomagnification.

"A species like a bald eagle, which eats a lot of fish, they're essentially getting a dose from everything that those fish have eaten in their lifetimes," Delach pointed out. "Biomagnification is why these pesticide issues show up worst in some of the 'top of the food chain' animals, like bald eagles."

Delach noted pesticides interfered with the bald eagle's calcium levels, which caused eggshells to be weak and less likely to hatch. The federal government banned the use of DDTin 1972 and a conservation law brought the bald eagle back from the brink. In 1973, Congress passed the Endangered Species Act and ever since, bald eagles have made major rebounds.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service estimates the bald eagle population now stands at more than 300,000. Many people assume the bald eagle has always been our national bird but while it has been a symbol on our country's seal for centuries, it had never been officially designated.

Delach added the decision is long overdue.

"It's really fitting that the bald eagle be our national bird," Delach asserted. "There are almost 70 species of eagle across the world but the bald eagle is the only one that's found only in North America. So it really is our national bird, as far as its territory and range."

The Endangered Species Act will celebrate its 51st anniversary Saturday.