NEW YORK – The October 6 deadline is fast approaching for nail salon owners in New York to secure wage bonds.

It's part of a new law that Gov. Andrew Cuomo says should ensure fair pay and health protections for nail salon workers, mostly women who are Asian and Latino immigrants.

Steven Choi, executive director of the advocacy group New York Immigration Coalition, praises the new rule, but says fear of reprisal often makes these workers reluctant to assert their rights, which could threaten the regulation's effectiveness.

"As somebody who has represented nail salon workers, even if you don't have an immigration status issue, coming forward to assert your rights is a big step – and one that, quite frankly, a lot of people who are the victims of wage theft are not willing to do, because they think they're going to be blacklisted from the industry," he stresses.

The new regulation comes several months after a New York Times exposé detailing nail salon labor abuses.

Salon owners who don't apply for wage bonds by the deadline face fines and other penalties, including losing their business license.

Another factor that will determine the law's effectiveness is how well state officials educate both nail salon owners and employees about the changes.

Charlene Obernauer, executive director of the New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health, says that may require state regulators to adjust the law and its implementation to account for issues including language barriers.

"Of course, in a state like New York where nail salon workers speak so many different languages, you know – probably more so than many other industries – translation and interpretation is always going to need to be a priority, and is going to need to be highlighted," she says.







get more stories like this via email

New Mexico has a sizable immigrant community - making up 11% of the state's labor force.

But during contentious U.S. elections, they can suffer a sort of collective discrimination by those worried about migrant crime.

Jonathan Salazar, research and policy analyst with New Mexico Voices for Children, says almost 200,000 immigrants live in New Mexico.

And they're not just neighbors and workers, but often employ others to grow the state's economy by operating storefront shops.

"Particularly in New Mexico, so many of them are immigrant-owned," said Salazar, "and I think it's important to also discuss the vibrancy, the culture that so many immigrants contribute to the state and to people's daily lives."

It's illegal for non-citizens to vote in U.S. elections, but it's nonetheless a central topic of this year's election.

On Friday, two of Georgia's top election officials, both Republicans, called out a social media video purporting to show Haitian migrants voting as fake and an "obvious lie."

Polls in New Mexico are open tomorrow from 7 a.m. until 7 p.m. - and in-person same-day registration is allowed.

New Mexico immigrants, primarily from Mexico, account for 31% of the state's college professors and more than 20% of restaurant cooks.

They also make up 15% of entrepreneurs and 22% of the state's construction workforce.

Salazar said many take jobs in the oil and gas industry - where younger workers will be critical to avoid labor shortages as older workers leave the work force.

"So many of them take harsh jobs, harsh conditions in our oil and gas companies which provides revenues for our state," said Salazar, "and that's money that goes into that funding for things like education."

New Mexico is the nation's second-largest crude oil-producing state, after Texas, contributing 14% of total U.S. crude oil production.

A study commissioned by New Mexico Voices for Children found immigrant workers and business owners generate $12 billion of the state's economic output.

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump held a rally Sunday that his critics say reinforced a hateful tone felt by Puerto Ricans and foreign-born populations.

Those helping new Americans resettle in rural North Dakota hope politics don't interfere.

Trump's position on immigration often focuses on undocumented individuals and the southern border. But while in office, he also placed tighter caps on refugee admissions.

Derrick Gross is the executive director of Communities Acting Together for Change and Hope - CATCH ND - a new nonprofit that assists non-English speakers adapting to rural North Dakota towns after being approved for resettlement.

Despite the national tone, Gross said he sees more positive welcoming examples locally.

"One of the families had a couple of young kids," said Gross. "They didn't have their driver's license yet so they needed a stroller and wagon so they could walk to the store and get groceries and supplies. Neighbors provided those things for them when put out a request on Facebook."

But if a resident in one of these communities is swayed by misinformation on the campaign trail, Gross urges them to learn about key programs while sharing their concerns.

As for the rally, the Trump campaign tried to distance itself from vulgar comments made by speakers who took to the podium ahead of the former president, saying they didn't reflect Trump's views.

This year, a study came out showing that undocumented immigrants paid nearly $100 billion in federal, state, and local taxes in 2022 - even as they are often barred from accessing social service programs.

For his group's part in working with refugees, Gross said it's important to understand they're trying to help rural communities - struggling with population loss - thrive.

"We're not looking to create sanctuary cities," said Gross. "We're looking to create situations where people who are coming here legitimately and legally - who want to be here - have an opportunity to be settled in a welcoming place."

Gross said these are people with a path to citizenship who can take jobs rural businesses are struggling to fill.

He said CATCH ND differs from traditional, larger resettlement efforts by focusing on smaller towns, where making local connections might foster a community-wide response in providing help.

The American Immigration Council says roughly 5% of North Dakota's population was born in another country - more than double the number reported 25 years ago.




get more stories like this via email

A strong majority of voters across party lines want lawmakers to create a path to citizenship for America's 11 million undocumented immigrants, not mass deportation, according to a new survey.

Jennifer Piper - West Region program director for the American Friends Service Committee - cited a series of so-called "show your papers" laws passed in Colorado between 2006 to 2013, which led to some of the highest deportation numbers in the nation.

"Here in Colorado, we already know what the policies of mass deportation look like intimately," said Piper. "And what we found is our businesses suffered, our schools suffered, our kids suffered."

Voters surveyed said allowing law-abiding undocumented residents living in the United States for years, paying their taxes, to apply for citizenship is a better way forward than a deportation program that would tap local law enforcement, the National Guard and possibly the military, at a cost of over $100 billion.

To counter a barrage of anti-immigrant messaging and disinformation that has become part of mainstream conversations, the AFSC has launched a billboard and radio ad campaign in Colorado and five other states aiming to welcome all people to the U.S.

"We really wanted to share a message that would remind us that Colorado is stronger," said Piper, "because we value every single person's hard work and contribution."

Each year, immigrants add $54 billion to Colorado's economy, and Piper said people deserve the same rights as commercial goods and capital to move safely across borders.

She pointed to the Registry Act as one solution, which has been gaining co-sponsors in both the U.S. House and Senate.

"Which would allow people who are undocumented - who are our neighbors, who have been here a long time," said Piper, "to come forward and get on a path to citizenship. It just requires the changing of one date in existing immigration law."

Support for this reporting was provided by the Carnegie Corporation of New York.



get more stories like this via email