NEW YORK - Does a fruit snack have to contain actual fruit if its packaging indicates it does? That's the question at the center of a federal court case in New York brought by parents suing Welch Foods, the maker of Welch's Fruit Snacks.
They say the snacks are "no more healthful than candy." The suit says the parents bought the snacks as a healthy option for their children based on the labeling, but found the product contains only a minimal amount of fruit and is mostly made of corn syrup and sugar.
Marie Bragg, assistant professor with NYU's Global Institute of Public Health, says federal regulations give advertisers a lot of leeway when it comes to food labeling.
"There's mixed evidence on whether or not turning fruit puree or fruit juice into snacks is healthy for you or not," says Bragg. "Companies sometimes try to convince consumers that because it's got fruit juice its healthy but that's not necessarily true."
The licensed manufacturer of the fruit snacks, Promotion in Motion, says it stands by the packaging and says the first ingredient of any Welch's Fruit Snack is fruit, whether in the form of juice or puree.
Promotion in Motion says the snacks meet Food and Drug Administration regulations. But federal guidelines stipulate a company cannot use the common name of a food, such as fruit or vegetable, if that's not what the product is, unless the percentage of the food is displayed on the packaging, which it is not on Welch's Fruit Snacks.
Hunter College professor Charles Platkin says this could be a tricky legal area for Welch's.
"Anytime you're marketing to children, a vulnerable population, it increases the level at which the food companies responsibility lands," says Platkin. "So, yes Welch's has vulnerability as do other food companies that market to children."
Promotion in Motion calls the claims in the lawsuit against Welch's Fruit Snacks "false and misleading" and maintains that fruit, whether in the form of puree or juice, is always the first ingredient. The company insists the labeling is truthful and gives consumers the information they need to make informed decisions.
get more stories like this via email
Law enforcement officers and drug prevention advocates in Missouri are joining forces to tackle prescription drug misuse.
As part of the Drug Enforcement Administration's "National Prescription Drug Take Back Day," five collection sites will be set up across Taney and Stone counties on April 26.
Data from two years ago showed around 190,000 Missourians misused opioids, including 180,000 who misused prescription pain relievers.
Marietta Hagan, project coordinator at Cox Health, warned prescription drug misuse contributes heavily to opioid use disorder.
"People would get prescription medication that didn't belong to them as easy as walking into their parent's medicine cabinet and pulling it out of there, or pulling it out of the side night table at bedtime," Hagan explained.
Volunteers will be at the sites offering free safety tips and disposal kits, making it easy for families to clear out their medicine cabinets.
Hagan emphasized "Drug Take Back Day" is about more than just safe disposal. It is also a reminder to store medications properly to prevent misuse. She shared guidance on how to safely get rid of unwanted medications.
"Previously government agencies had encouraged actually the flushing of medications," Hagan noted. "But we now know thanks to environmental science, that is not recommended. Those medications end up in our water supply, in our lakes and our streams."
Most prescription and over-the-counter medications will be accepted, including pills, patches, and vapes without batteries. National Prescription Drug Take Back Day is held twice a year, typically in April and October.
get more stories like this via email
A Tennessee nonprofit is warning that potential Medicaid cuts could threaten crucial support for the state's nearly 1 million family caregivers.
Medicaid supports 4.5 million individuals through home health-care services nationwide.
Megan Schwalm, president and CEO of the Tennessee Caregiver Coalition, said more than half of its funding comes from the now-dismantled Administration for Community Living - which has been folded into the Department of Health and Human Services.
Schwalm said federal funding cuts have affected the coalition, which provides respite services for people caring for loved ones with dementia or other serious conditions.
"Our state typically reimburses at $23.44 an hour for respite, and so us being able to provide at about $5 an hour is a huge cost savings," said Schwalm. "But with those cuts to Medicaid and the Administration for Community Living, we won't be able to provide those services any longer."
She said the funding cuts have already forced the loss of a staff position and nearly all outreach efforts for respite services across Tennessee.
Medicaid is jointly funded by states and the federal government, but Congress is proposing cutting Medicaid spending by $880 billion over 10 years.
According to AARP, Tennessee already ranks poorly among states for its lack of supports and services for caregivers and people with disabilities.
Schwalm acknowledged that Medicaid could benefit from reform, but she said dismantling it without a clear, comprehensive plan would be detrimental to the people of Tennessee.
"These cuts to Medicaid are coming, but there is no safety net in place," said Schwalm. "There is no alternative. And so it is very unclear what will happen to these folks in these programs."
She emphasized the importance of Tennesseans letting their elected officials know how they feel about safeguarding these safety net programs.
get more stories like this via email
A bill in the Tennessee General Assembly is reigniting debate over how rural hospitals can staff anesthesia providers. House Bill 979 would address the shortage of anesthesiologists in rural Tennessee by allowing hospitals in counties with fewer than 105,000 residents to directly employ physician anesthesiologists.
Hospitals now have to use third-party anesthesiology services.
Dr. Louis Chemin III, anesthesiologist and physician with Tennessee Anesthesiology Consultants Exchange, supports physician supervision in what's known as the "Anesthesia Care Team" model. He said anyone hired as an anesthesiologist would be required to follow strict medical guidelines.
"Currently under state law, a hospital cannot employ an anesthesiologist, a radiologist, a pathologist or an emergency medicine physician. If this bill were to pass, it would allow hospitals in these rural communities the option to hire an anesthesiologist," he contended.
Chemin said the bill would allow a hospital anesthesiologist to perform anesthesia in one operating room, or to supervise the process in up to four operating rooms.
On Wednesday, the bill passed the House with a vote of 72 to 5, with 11 members "present but not voting." It now heads to the state Senate.
When a physician anesthesiologist provides medical direction to Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists or Anesthesiologist Assistants, Chemin explained, they must comply with seven steps outlined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to qualify for reimbursement under Medicare.
"This law means that if a hospital employs an anesthesiologist, that they must allow the anesthesiologist to practice in a way that is safe and is in agreement with these seven steps," he continued.
Chemin added that these requirements would ensure the anesthesiologist's active involvement in the patient's care and safety.
get more stories like this via email