PIERRE, S.D. - South Dakota lawmakers are now considering two bills that LGBT advocates say target transgender students in a negative way. The first passed out of committee Monday and restricts transgender students from using bathrooms designated for people with the opposite physical sex.

The other is a second attempt by Republican lawmakers to repeal a South Dakota High School Activities Association policy allowing transgender students to play on sports teams based on their gender identity. Libby Skarin, policy director with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of South Dakota, opposes both bills.

"In conversations we've had with transgender students across South Dakota and their families, it becomes abundantly clear that these kids really only want to go to school and live their lives in an authentic way," says Skarin. "They don't want to be singled out or segregated from their peers."

State Representative Fred Deutsch is the prime sponsor of the bathroom regulation bill. He says the move would protect the privacy of all students. That legislation could come up before the full House for a vote as early as today.

However, advocates, including the Human Rights Campaign, argue that these bills could run up against federal anti-discrimination regulations. Additionally, Skarin says these types of laws can add to the social problems that transgender students already face.

"We hear these stories from people about why these bill hurt and how they stigmatize them," says Skarin. "But more than that we've got studies that have shown that schools can be a hostile place for LGBT students. Bullying, assaults, et cetera, these things have a severe affect on those kids."

Several school districts across the country are facing similar legal challenges. The U.S. Department of Education and the Department of Justice have said in the past that legislating separate restrooms for transgender students would be a violation of Title IX rules.



get more stories like this via email

The organization OutNebraska is holding an event not only to raise money for LGBTQ+ issues but to help people better understand the issues and their importance in the community.

The Classy-Tacky Ball is as much a "friendraiser" as a fundraiser. OutNebraska focuses on advocacy, education and celebration.

Abbi Swatsworth, executive director of OutNebraska, said the group sees the event as a chance to help community members be better allies for LGBTQ+ people and teach them how to be civically engaged.

"Whether that is through volunteering for boards or commissions, voting in elections, how to contact your policymakers, how to talk to your local school board," Swatsworth outlined. "Those sorts of things."

The event is scheduled for April 5 in Lincoln.

Swatsworth added efforts include speaking up where LGBTQ+ voices typically have not been heard and pointed out there are plenty of ways for people to get involved.

"That might look like phone banking or helping to recruit other volunteers, or helping community members connect with their elected officials," Swatsworth explained.

For those who may not be comfortable reaching out or being in public, Swatsworth noted OutNebraska also needs people to do data entry, tidy up the office and help staff the Pride events scheduled statewide this summer.

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox could sign a bill that would ban LGBTQ+ pride flags from Utah's public schools and government buildings.

The bill's Republican sponsors argue it's all in an effort to encourage political neutrality among government workers and teachers.

Chad Call, executive director with the Utah Pride Center, called the bill "wild government overreach" and unconstitutional.

Call said folks in other communities can use or wear symbols that indicate their values. He said he sees the pride flag being no different.

"Those symbols are largely recognized as free speech in this country," said Call. "This bill is, in our opinion, an infringement on that free speech, especially in the workplace where people have a right to express themselves. We feel like pride flags are in alignment with that."

Call encouraged Cox to veto the bill and consider how many Utahns in the state would be impacted.

Just over 6% of the state's adult population identifies as LGBTQ+, according to UCLA's Williams Institute.

Call argued that Cox and other lawmakers have an obligation to adequately represent all Utahns, not just a select few.

The Utah Pride Festival is taking place on June 7 and 8 in Salt Lake City. The celebration is organized by the Utah Pride Center.

Call said while he doesn't know if Cox will sign HB 77 into law or not, he added that Utah Pride and other local pride celebrations will still take place.

"We will still gather together the first week of June," said Call. "We will still fly our pride flags, even if the city can't join us in that. We will still gather and we will still come together and celebrate something that we have for decades in the state."

As LGBTQ+ plus rights have come under fire across state legislatures, Call said he has a simple message to LGBTQ+ plus folks who may feel discouraged and disappointed with their elected officials.

"Our community is stronger than this," said Call. "Our community has been through challenges and situations like this in the past. It doesn't make them OK, but it does make us a resilient and strong community."

Gov. Kim Reynolds has signed a measure that removes gender identity protections for LGBTQ+ people from Iowa's civil rights code. Opponents call it "mean spirited."

Senate File 418 makes Iowa the first state in the country to remove civil rights protections for a group of people who have been protected by law, taking the words "gender identity" out of its code.

Anne Discher, executive director of the group Common Good Iowa, said the measure belies Iowa's open-minded reputation and sends the wrong message to the rest of the nation.

"Basically, it is saying that it's OK to discriminate against trans people in the workplace, in housing, in school and in their financial lives," Discher explained.

Supporters of the measure, which was the first bill Reynolds signed in 2025, said including gender identity in Iowa's civil rights code threatens "common sense" laws banning transgender participation in sports and clarify who can use which public restrooms. Iowa passed its Civil Rights Act in 1965.

Hundreds of protesters rallied against the bill at the Statehouse in Des Moines before Reynolds signed it. Discher argued Iowa lawmakers are not representing their constituents.

"I really firmly believe this bill does not reflect the true beliefs of most Iowans," Discher stressed. "I think it's
incredibly more extreme than Iowans truly are in their hearts."

If it is not challenged in court, the measure is scheduled to take effect July 1.


get more stories like this via email