AUSTIN, Texas - New research shows restrictions placed on Texas clinics that perform abortions are causing significant barriers and hardships for women seeking those services.

A study by the Texas Policy Evaluation Project says more than half of the clinics that provided abortion services in Texas have closed since House Bill 2 went into effect in 2013.

Liza Fuentes, a co-researcher on the study, says they interviewed almost 400 women seeking abortion services between May and August of 2014.

"We were really able to provide some research on multiple obstacles that haven't been well measured before," says Fuentes. "Everything from increased travel distances to out-of-pocket expenses, to women's own assessment of difficulties."

House Bill 2, passed by the Texas Legislature in July 2013, requires abortion clinics meet ambulatory surgical center standards, and that their doctors have admitting privileges at local hospitals.

It also limits abortions to the first 20 weeks of pregnancy.

Fuentes says of the 41 clinics that existed before the law was passed, only 19 remained open a year later.

She adds among the women surveyed, by mid-2014, the average travel distance to a clinic was 85 miles. That, and longer waits to schedule services, meant many women were having abortions much later in their pregnancies.

"The delays and later abortion are concerning, because they're more expensive for women," says Fuentes. "And, even though abortion is one of the most common and safest medical procedures in the United States, later abortion still does carry risk."

The constitutionality of HB2 has been challenged in the courts and is awaiting a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Texas Policy Evaluation Project is a program of the Population Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin.


get more stories like this via email

Mother's Day is fast approaching and an Arizona mom wants women of all ages to make sure they are prioritizing their heart health.

Nearly 45% of women age 20 and older are living with some form of heart disease and do not know it.

Sharla Fisher was in her late 30s when she received her first pacemaker. She said she always lived an active and healthy lifestyle but would experience occasional blackouts. It was not until she sought medical attention experts determined she had an abnormally low heart rate and blood pressure and was later diagnosed with neurocardiogenic syncope, also known as vasovagal syncope.

"It is not a fatal condition by any means," Fisher explained. "But what becomes fatal is this happened to me while I was driving with my children on the freeway. This has happened to me when I'm flying cross-country, in a cab in the middle of a city I don't know at one o'clock in the morning."

Fisher added in talking with her doctor, they determined a pacemaker would help regulate her cardiovascular system. Fisher shares her story to inspire other women to take heart health seriously. This year's American Heart Association Go Red for Women Luncheon will celebrate women like Fisher and share vital information to keep women healthy. The event will be on May 8 at the Westin Kierland Resort and Spa in Scottsdale.

Fisher pointed out after receiving her pacemaker, things still did not feel right. She wound up in the emergency room while traveling and was diagnosed with cardiac tamponade, which is when there is excess fluid in the sac surrounding the heart. Doctors informed her she would need open-heart surgery, prompting Fisher to call her children and say goodbye.

"Because I didn't know how we would make it out of this procedure, and, like I said, my organs had already started shutting down," Fisher recounted. "Obviously I am here, so there is a good story that comes out of all of this, but it was then that it really opened my eyes to women and heart disease."

Megan Stuff is this year's Phoenix Go Red for Women chair and said she has been having discussions about heart health with her young daughters who are 8 and 12 years old.

"We have to start these discussions so that we really can break some of those statistics," Stuff stressed. "That is my goal for the luncheon is to just bring awareness and advocacy for cardiovascular disease in women and just start the conversation as early as possible."

Many residents of West Virginia are at risk of losing health care under a federal proposal to cut Medicaid funding by $880 billion.

Sen. Jim Justice, R-W.Va., and Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., voted for the cuts.

Ellen Allen, executive director of West Virginians for Affordable Healthcare, said more than 500,000 Mountain State residents rely on Medicaid for health coverage.

"We've seen no interest in our legislators trying to make up the difference so they can keep health care intact for over a half a million West Virginians," Allen pointed out.

Allen added other states are also preparing for potential cuts and looking for solutions to fill in the gaps. More than 200,000 West Virginians lost Medicaid coverage after the end of pandemic era continuous coverage rules.

Allen explained 72,000 residents in skilled nursing facilities need Medicaid to pay for housing and care. She believes some facilities will shut down when faced with budget cuts.

"These are people who couldn't afford long-term care and policies," Allen explained. "Their families don't have the resources to support them. So what are you going to do with 72,000 people in skilled nursing facilities when Medicaid is not there to support it?"

State-supported home care for people with disabilities could also be at risk. According to the National Rural Health Association, slightly under half of the nation's rural hospitals are operating at a loss. Cuts to Medicaid would likely mean more rural hospital closures statewide.

The Alaska branch of the American Heart Association is helping save lives by teaching the use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillators in rural communities.

In a medical emergency, such as a heart attack, time and distance can be a formidable obstacle in rural Alaska for getting a patient to a hospital. The association said only about 10% of people who suffer a cardiac arrest outside a hospital will survive but access to CPR or a defibrillator can triple those odds.

Kristin George, executive director of the American Heart Association of Alaska, said it is all about keeping the blood flowing.

"The benefit of having CPR and AED education is restarting the heart," George explained. "If we can keep the blood flowing to the heart, then we're not losing any of the parts we need. The reason we do the education is to continue to keep that heart beating."

George noted by 2030, the association plans to visit more than 220 rural Alaskan villages. Each visit will include a hands-only CPR and AED skills session led by a LifeMed Alaska expert. Each town will get a CPR Anytime Training Kit, so residents can practice their skills and teach others.

George pointed out the goal is to increase the number of residents in Alaska's rural communities trained to provide chest compressions or apply an external defibrillator to restart a heart. She emphasized many remote villages in Alaska are detached from the state's road system, meaning it can take a long time for medical help to arrive.

"Any village that's out on the coast or anything like that is going to be pretty much unable to get there without a plane," George observed. "Or if you wanted to take the longest trek of your life and do it sled dog or by snow machine."

George added the Association has set a goal of doubling the survival rate from cardiac arrests in Alaska by 2030. The Foss Family Foundation and LifeMed Alaska are sponsoring the rural Alaska effort.