INDIANAPOLIS - One week after a federal judge put new abortion restrictions passed by the Indiana Legislature on hold in another case, Planned Parenthood and the ACLU of Indiana have gone to court to challenge part of House Enrolled Act 1337, which requires women to have an ultrasound 18 hours before getting an abortion.

The two groups on Thursday filed a request for declaratory and injunctive relief with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana.

"Because of the Supreme Court ruling last week, the door opened for us to seek further review," said Betty Cockrum, president and chief executive of Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, "and so, we filed for repeal of the requirement that an ultrasound be done 18 hours in advance of the abortion procedure."

Last month, a federal judge blocked HEA 1337, which also would ban abortions based on fetal abnormalities. Cockrum was referring to the U.S. Supreme Court's June 27 decision striking down a Texas law. The court said requiring doctors at abortion clinics to have hospital admitting privileges and facility specifications for clinics placed an undue burden on women seeking to end a pregnancy.

Anti-abortion advocates have said they're worried about patient health, but Cockrum said there's more to it than that.

"So, all these smokescreens, all these efforts that legislators, members of Congress, whomever, try to get on the books, are simply barriers," she said. "They add no value, they do nothing to enhance patient safety - and, in fact, they add stress and, in some cases, delays."

Indiana already has some of the most restrictive abortion laws in the nation, and Gov. Mike Pence has called HEA 1337 a "comprehensive pro-life measure."

The text of the bill is online at iga.in.gov.


get more stories like this via email

As the new year unfolds, rural health providers in North Dakota and other states will continue to have extra latitude in using telehealth technology. But a temporary extension of key rules still leaves uncertainty.

When Congress avoided a government shutdown in late December, it approved a funding resolution that runs through mid-March. For the next few months, that plan keeps in place relaxed telehealth regulations for people on Medicare that started during the pandemic.

Even though telehealth use has declined since the COVID emergency ended, said Brad Gibbens, deputy director of the Center for Rural Health at the University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, this option is still useful in remote areas.

"People can not only stay in their own community and interact with a physician or another type of provider and not having to travel," he said, "they can actually, in many cases, do this right out of their home."

He added that because these interactions are timelier, telehealth cuts down on health-care costs by reducing hospital admissions. A number of health organizations want the relaxed rules made permanent, so providers can better plan for them and patients don't lose continuity.

Telehealth access has bipartisan support, but skeptics have voiced concerns about privacy breaches and lower quality of care.

Gibbens stressed that telehealth should not be seen as a replacement for in-person visits. When the situation allows, he said, doctors still prefer having a patient come see them.

"They feel they get more of a review of the patient by seeing their body language and how they react," he said, "and it's kind of the nature of medicine."

However, Gibbens disagreed with assertions that there's a dropoff in the level of care when the visit happens online. He said that for patents in areas with very limited provider access or transportation gaps, telehealth is better than no care at all. He added that broadband investments have helped smaller clinics overcome technology barriers in enhancing online appointments.


get more stories like this via email

Holidays are traditionally a slow time for blood donations, but recent events have made the need for people to give blood and plasma in the Magnolia State even more urgent.

Following the deaths and injuries from a terrorist attack in New Orleans in the early hours of New Year's Day, Mississippi officials have pitched in to supply blood for victims of the violence. As a member of the Blood Emergency Readiness Corps, Mississippi Blood Services is supporting the efforts of the Blood Center of New Orleans.

Kasey Dickson, Mississippi Blood Services' director of public relations and marketing, said they have immediate needs.

"We are desperately looking for individuals that are eligible to donate platelets," she said, "as well as individuals with the blood types of O, negative or positive, and B, negative or positive."

Dickson said the agency is contacting its list of regular donors as well as putting out a call for new ones. Donations can be made at the blood centers in Flowood, in Cleveland and Oxford, and at mobile vans around the state. To find one, look online at MSBlood.com or call 888-90-BLOOD (888-902-5663).
Dixon said donors need to be at least 17 years old, be in general good health and complete a health history questionnaire. Approved individuals can donate about every two months, platelets every seven days, and plasma once a month.

"Fortunately, the donors of Mississippi helped get our supply ready, and we were able to ship enough products to assist the Blood Center of New Orleans ahead of time," she said. "And now, we're wanting to replenish our supply, so we can continue those efforts to help them."

Dickson said it was an honor to help another state with blood in its time of need, but added that it's equally important to care for Mississippians. She said people need to remember that blood isn't created, it's given.

"Blood itself can only be donated," she said. "It cannot be manufactured in a tube or re-created in a tube, so it has to be given from person to person."


get more stories like this via email

With the 2025 legislative session around the corner, the nonprofit advocacy group Alabama Arise said it plans to take aim at poverty and systemic challenges that hit families the hardest.

Big issues like health care access, public transportation and unfair court fines often weigh on lower-income families.

Robyn Hyden, executive director of Alabama Arise, said it is time for state leaders to step up and tackle the concerns.

"Our state, because we underfund state government and we underfund our court systems, we heavily rely on fines and fees that really disproportionately hurt low-income families and working families," Hyden contended.

Hyden believes cutting court fines and fees could be life-changing for some, freeing up money for essentials like food and health care. She highlighted the need for Medicaid expansion, removing the grocery tax and protecting voting rights as top priorities for 2025. State legislators have so far refused to expand Medicaid.

One of the most pressing issues Alabama Arise wants to see addressed is health care during and after pregnancy since the state has among the highest rates of maternal and infant mortality. A new report from Pregnancy Justice shows Alabama led the nation with 104 prosecutions of pregnant people in the year following the Dobbs decision.

Hyden stressed she wants to see an end to the state criminalizing pregnancy-related issues and instead, improving access to prenatal care.

"We don't think that women should be prosecuted because they have a miscarriage," Hyden emphasized. "We believe that health care providers should be able to provide lifesaving care to women in those situations. And we believe that when women are given drugs during labor, which does happen, they should not then be incarcerated or have their children removed."

The legislative session begins in February. Hyden added Alabama Arise is planning an advocacy day in March to unite voices in support of low-income and working families.