LANCASTER, Pa. — Education advocates are suing the Lancaster School District, saying it is violating state and federal law by refusing to enroll immigrant students with limited English proficiency in regular high school.
A lawsuit filed in federal district court Tuesday accused the district of either refusing to enroll 17- to 21-year-old, non-English-speaking refugees at all, or diverting them to a privately operated school for underachieving students. According to Maura McInerney, senior staff attorney with the Education Law Center, vulnerable students with intensive language shortfalls are not getting what they need.
"They're not provided with rigorous ESL (English-as-a-Second-Language programs), to which they are entitled,” McInerney said. "They're also not modifying the curriculum to ensure that these students are receiving instruction."
The district said it is meeting all legal requirements, adding English language instruction is available at the alternative school. The plaintiffs in the suit include refugees from Somalia, Sudan and Myanmar who have fled war, violence and persecution in their home countries.
According to McInerney, J. P. McCaskey High School - the regular district high school in Lancaster - has a special program designed for such students, but those who insist on being allowed to enroll are routinely sent to Phoenix Academy, the alternative school.
"Students at Phoenix Academy are subject to pat-down searches,” McInerney said. “They're prohibited from bringing their belongings into school. They have to wear colored shirts that correspond with their behavior."
She said many immigrant students with limited English end up dropping out of school altogether.
The lawsuit asked the court to ensure that all students with limited English proficiency be allowed to enroll directly in the school district, and that they be allowed to receive their education at the regular high school.
"We think that all of these students are legally entitled to equal educational opportunities, that would be provided at McCaskey,” McInerney said.
Two similar lawsuits have been filed in New York and Florida in the past 15 months.
For more on the lawsuit, visit aclupa.org.
get more stories like this via email
Connecticut educators and other public sector workers are celebrating passage of the Social Security Fairness Act.
The new federal law repealed two provisions which had reduced Social Security benefits for some public sector workers who also receive a pension and who will now be eligible for benefits they would have earned in 2024.
Kate Dias, president of the Connecticut Education Association, said passing this law rights a 40-year-old wrong.
"The government chose, erroneously, to penalize public service employees to try and balance Social Security, and it was never a just cause," Dias asserted. "It's great to see this overturned; money returned to people who have rightfully earned it."
Supporters of the change said the biggest challenge to passing the law was many people were unaware of these limits for public employees. Some critics charged it could speed up the timelinefor Social Security's insolvency.
Dias feels there's more work to do, including higher teacher salaries to reflect the education required to do the work. Reports show most Connecticut salaries do not keep up with the cost of living.
Feedback on the law has been overwhelmingly positive. Dias noted the money being reimbursed to public sector workers will enable some to retire who otherwise could not, without losing certain benefits.
"We have teachers that are in their 70s that haven't been able to retire," Dias observed. "This is going to enable them to do that. We've gotten the stories from people who called us and said, 'I've been living moment to moment, paycheck to paycheck, and been collecting food stamps, and now I'm not going to have to do that. I'm not going to be a burden to my family.'"
The new law may also help Connecticut recruit second-career teachers, people with previous careers as accountants, engineers and in other in-demand fields. Since the state is in the third year of a teacher shortage, Dias added it could help close widening gaps.
"In terms of retention, those second-career educators we have brought into the profession often have to leave before they are vested in the pension so they don't get penalized," Dias pointed out. "That's a problem as well, because they're only with our profession for a short period of time, as opposed to being able to have a long career."
get more stories like this via email
A North Carolina university student is breaking new ground in math education.
Megan McAnany is an elementary and special education major at William Peace University.
She is making history as the first student from her school to win the North Carolina Council of Teachers of Mathematics Outstanding Mathematics Education Student award.
McAnany said her achievement highlights her dedication to math education, and the value of her university's personalized teaching approach.
"I felt very honored to be able to be the one that's recognized for my school," said McAnany. "And I think part of that is because I had such great classmates, and a teacher that focused really on that one-on-one."
The NCCTM began recognizing college students in 2012, with winners typically coming from larger institutions - such as East Carolina, North Carolina State, and Elon University.
McAnany is set to begin student teaching this spring, following her successful placement at Green Elementary in Raleigh.
She said her goal is to make math engaging and approachable, something that played a key role in earning the award. She also credited her student-centered approach for its impact on young learners.
"You have to see your student - who they are, who their interests are, what their strengths are, and what their needs are," said McAnany. "And instead of teaching everybody the same and giving them the same strategies, you have to look at it as an individualized student and help them find different strategies. "
As North Carolina grapples with a shortage of teachers, McAnany said she is ready to bring fresh energy and innovative strategies to the classroom, inspiring the next generation of learners.
get more stories like this via email
Despite pushback, Idaho is again targeting diversity and inclusion efforts on college campuses.
Over the holiday break, the Idaho State Board of Education passed the "Resolution on DEI Ideology in Higher Education," which prevents "central offices, policies, procedures or initiatives" on diversity, equity and inclusion.
Francisco Salinas, who currently works at Spokane Falls Community College, has worked at the University of Idaho and Boise State University, including as director of student diversity and inclusion. He said he worked with students and student groups that welcomed and supported peers with similar backgrounds and experiences.
"I got to see it be transformational in the lives of students, and it was heartwarming," Salinas recounted. "That's why it's so heartbreaking to see these things taken away."
The board said DEI efforts in higher education are not welcoming for every student but the board acknowledged at the Dec. 18 meeting where the resolution passed it received feedback from nearly 700 students, about 80% of whom were against the resolution.
Many Idaho universities have already closed or renamed offices and positions associated with diversity and inclusion, including Salinas, who had his job title changed to assistant to the vice president for equity initiatives at Boise State University before he left in 2022. He stressed students and staff are likely to reconsider coming to or staying in Idaho.
"This kind of thing makes it less likely that the state of Idaho not only will see a diverse population of students in higher education but it's a real signal for faculty that might consider employment in the state of Idaho that the state of Idaho is actually hostile to diversity efforts," Salinas contended.
Higher education institutions are required to comply with the resolution by June 30 but Salinas hopes students in particular feel it is an ongoing discussion.
"Because there was a decision made does not mean that the conversation is over, and that's the way that power works," Salinas asserted. "It's an ongoing negotiation, but they need to know that they have a place in that negotiation."
get more stories like this via email