SPRINGFIELD, Ill. - Illinois voters like labor unions, but generally find Governor Bruce Rauner's approach to labor negotiations to be unfavorable, according to a new poll. This month the progressive political research group ALG took a survey of about 600 likely Illinois voters. The findings show that more than half trust the state's public employee unions more than the governor when it comes to labor disputes.

Anders Lindall public affairs director with AFSCME Council 31, part of the state's largest employee union, said the poll comes as the union has been urging Rauner to return to bargaining a new contract.

"The poll shows that voters reject Rauner's approach to try impose his unfair terms on workers, potentially forcing a strike," he said. "On the contrary, voters strongly support public service workers."

According to the poll, 54 percent of Illinois voters favor the unions in the negotiations, while only 30 percent support Rauner. However, in a statement to Capitol Fax, Rauner's office called the research a "fabricated poll."

Earlier this year, Rauner's administration asked the state labor board to allow him to impose new terms in the state worker contract. The board denied that request two weeks ago. Lindall argues the poll suggests that Illinois voters want to see the governor and state employees come to an agreement. The talks between AFSCME and the governor have been stalled since January.

"Not confrontation, but compromise," he added. "That's what AFSCME wants, clearly that's what the people of Illinois want. Bruce Rauner trying to force confrontation is out on an island with the support of a small minority of Illinoisans."

According to the union, Rauner's demands include a four-year wage freeze and doubling workers' costs for health care.

The full report can be read online here.


get more stories like this via email

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox has signed House Bill 267 into law, a controversial measure that takes away the collective bargaining rights of public employee unions.

Many union workers voiced their concerns and urged Cox to veto the bill, which they contend would damage unions.

But the bill's sponsor, state Rep. Jordan Teuscher - R-South Jordan, said he heard from many teachers and other public sector workers in the right-to-work state, who weren't part of a union and felt they didn't have a voice.

He said now, the bill will allow them to negotiate their own employment terms.

"Teachers talked about where they had an idea, a change that they wanted - in insurance is an example," said Teuscher, "and they went to the administration to ask them about that and the administration said, 'Well, you're going to have to go talk to the union about it.' And so they'd go to the union to talk about it and the union says 'well, you're not a member, we don't really care what you think.'"

Teuscher contended the law will make public employers' wages and benefits more competitive.

He added that employers will continue to "value and listen to the priorities" of union leaders, as they'll still represent a significant portion of workers.

In a statement, the Utah Education Association - a union which represents 18,000 public school teachers - said they're not letting the "setback" stop them, and said this moment reinforces the importance of unions.

While lawmakers considered a compromise, they couldn't reach an alternative.

In a statement Cox said, "Utah has long been known as a state that can work together to solve difficult issues. I'm disappointed that in this case, the process did not ultimately deliver the compromise that at one point was on the table and that some stakeholders had accepted."

Teuscher argued that no one worked harder than he did to reach that compromise.

"I met daily, multiple times a day with different union leaders," said Teuscher, "to try to get to the end of the road, something that the Senate could be comfortable with and the House could be comfortable with that was short of the ban."

Teuscher contended public employees that like their unions are going to continue being members and have unions advocate on their behalf.

But labor groups fear if public entities were resistant to listening to concerns before, now they likely won't listen to a single employee.




get more stories like this via email

Connecticut union organizers are working to get pension plans for paraeducators.

In recent years, they have won a flurry of benefits from organizing but getting a pension plan has not been easy, since a General Assembly bill to create one has not made it through the Appropriations Committee in three years.

Michael Barry, campaign coordinator for the Connecticut Coalition for Retirement Security, pointed out most paraeducators have to work second jobs to afford everyday life, so their salaries make it hard to save for retirement.

"You can't put money into a 401(k) when you're barely making ends meet and paying your rent and keeping the car going," Barry emphasized. "Connecticut is like most places in New York, you really need a car. So, that's a whole other expense."

A 2021 Connecticut Paraeducator Advisory Council study found most paraeducators make less than $19 an hour and one in five makes $13 to $16 an hour. The state is already grappling with a shortage of teachers and aides.

A Connecticut Education Association survey last year found 69% of school districts reporting job openings for paraeducators.

Another way to help paraeducators would be to raise the minimum wage, more than it was already increased this year. The latest ALICE update shows the number of "asset-limited, income-constrained, employed" families grew 13% in 2022, the largest jump in a decade.

Barry argued creating a living wage would be beneficial.

"Rents are outrageous now. You know, rent, utilities are bad," Barry outlined. "Eversource keeps raising rates and it's just terrible. You know, just being able to survive, you need to be making a decent amount of money."

Connecticut's minimum wage is a little over $16 an hour, or an annual income of around $34,000. ALICE data found 38% of teachers' aides were living below the ALICE threshold.

A New York City music school's faculty is back in the classroom after a weeklong strike.

The Manhattan School of Music's Precollege Program faculty walked off the job after lengthy union negotiations broke down. The teachers have been working without a union contract since last August. While the union has made concessions, it said the school has been reluctant to compromise.

Adam Kent, president of the Manhattan School of Music Precollege Faculty Union, said they were forced to strike because the school was not taking the union seriously.

"We gave them over three weeks. We asked them if they wanted to reconsider their last proposal and they spelled it out that, no, they wouldn't be making any new proposals," Kent recounted. "We gave them two days notice when we actually declared the strike, and their first response was to try to line up 'scabs.'"

He noted the union is heading back to the bargaining table with the hope of getting a cost of living increase aligned with other schools, such as the Mannes School of Music and Juilliard. In a statement, the Manhattan School called the union's actions "disruptive to student learning" and argued they have had little or no availability to negotiate. Students, parents and other union members have joined the faculty's picket line.

While this was the first strike, Kent said he cannot say whether it will be the last. He cautioned there could be another, longer strike if the pattern of bargaining continues. He added recent comments from the school's attorney regarding the union's National Labor Relations Board case against the school make him leery about what lies ahead.

"The attorney made a comment to us, 'Good luck with your board,' in the context of the eviscerating of all of these federal agencies under the new administration, and we were really chilled by that," Kent acknowledged. "We really saw it as part of this idea of people claiming impunity and taking advantage of the current political climate."

Throughout negotiations, there have been questions about how much money is available for faculty raises. The school has continuously said there are not enough funds for a pay raise, but tax filing data show the school's president and executives received large pay increases last year. Other data indicate the school's tuition has risen 58% since 2014.


get more stories like this via email