MADISON, Wis. - Wisconsin is home to 11 sovereign American Indian tribes, and rarely do any of the tribes spend much money supporting political committees or candidates. But the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, a nonpartisan watchdog group that carefully tracks political spending, has just reported that the Forest County Potawatomi Community has, in the first half of the year, spent more money on politics than in the past six years combined.
Matt Rothschild is executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign.
"Well it's dramatic that the Potawatomi tribe has spent more than $70,000 from its PAC to political committees and candidates here in Wisconsin the first seven months, it's the biggest PAC contributor in the state, except for the Realtors, and it's just curious," he said.
The tribe has spent three times as much on Republicans as Democrats. Most of the money, according to Rothschild, went to two Republican legislative campaign committees that raise money from special interests to spend on elections. The Potawatomi did not return calls for comment on this story. None of the 10 other tribes have so dramatically increased political spending.
The Potawatomi spending increase is a mystery to Rothschild, who points out that the tribe, which operates a huge casino in Milwaukee, was the benefactor of a decision from Governor Scott Walker to reject a proposed $800 million casino the Menominee tribe wanted to build in Kenosha.
"One thing I know they'll probably oppose is the betting on fantasy football that is just a craze across the country right now," he added. "Or maybe they're worried about a move down the road to legalize gambling in Wisconsin, as other states have, outside of Indian casinos."
Rothschild said the Potawatomi PAC gave a total of $9,000 to Governor Walker's campaign in 2011 and 2013.
get more stories like this via email
Abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, gun-violence and democracy itself are some of the issues Democrats said are at stake ahead of November's election.
Sen. Priya Sundareshan, D-Tucson, took part in the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee's "Summer of the States" event where the power and role of state legislatures was discussed.
She said within the Arizona legislature, Democrats are currently only two seats away from potentially flipping both chambers, which would deliver what she called a "Democratic trifecta" for the Grand Canyon State. Sundareshan has been an advocate for protecting contraception and reproductive rights in Arizona.
"It was Democrats who led the effort, successfully, to repeal our 1864 abortion ban," Sundareshan pointed out. "We got one or two Republicans to join with us but that was not an effort that the Republican majority led."
Sundareshan and other Democrats are banking on abortion to drive voters to the polls this November in Arizona, where President Joe Biden won by just 10,000 votes in 2020. Recent polls show Biden is currently behind former President Donald Trump in their likely rematch.
Meanwhile, the coalition Arizona for Abortion Access recently submitted 800,000 signatures to get a measure on the ballot to enact a constitutional protection for abortion.
Sundareshan noted Republican lawmakers have been able to bypass Gov. Katie Hobbs' veto pen by placing several ballot referrals to voters she argued are anti-democracy, anti-immigrant and anti-worker. House House Concurrent Resolution 2060 will be on the November ballot. It could expand regulations for businesses to verify the status of independent subcontractors and make it more difficult for migrants to access public benefits.
While backers said it will achieve what the federal government has failed to do, Sundareshan countered the proposal will only hurt Arizona.
"We are the backstop against attacks on our democracy and Arizona is at the forefront of these attacks," Sundareshan emphasized.
Sundareshan added all eyes will be on Arizona as a key battleground state. She reminded voters while the presidential race does garner lots of buzz, state lawmakers are vitally important in safeguarding the everyday freedoms and protections citizens reap.
get more stories like this via email
A U.S. Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity from prosecution is raising concerns about the power of the executive branch - and the future of democracy. In one of its final decisions of the term, the majority of justices ruled in Trump versus United States that presidents are immune from criminal prosecution when performing "official acts."
Adrienne Evans, executive director of United Vision for Idaho, said this means the president can break the law and not worry about being investigated.
"Do we trust whomever is elected next not to use that power? Because right now," she explained, "everything hinges not that the power has been granted but will there be a president that we have who will not use that power to their favor?"
In her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that the ruling makes the president a "king above the law."
Evans noted this issue has been compounded by the politicization of the courts, and added that the courts have been weaponized to serve the party in power.
"We have always lived in a system where we had relatively stable systems of checks and balances. What this latest decision by the Supreme Court did was it put all of the power in the hands of the executive and, in subsequent rulings, also undermined the administration of the state," she continued.
Evans said Congress could take steps to rein in the Supreme Court by instituting term limits, creating an enforceable code of ethics and expanding the number of justices on the court, but added that Congress will have to act soon to prevent a worst-case scenario in which democracy erodes completely.
"It's going to take the will of the people demanding that their congressional representatives vote for those measures, that we take this moment as a dire warning that we have to reset course if we still believe that democracy is our best path forward," she said.
Disclosure: United Vision for Idaho contributes to our fund for reporting on Civic Engagement, Civil Rights, Community Issues and Volunteering. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
In a significant turnaround, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has reversed its stance on ballot dropboxes - making them legal again in a 4-3 ruling.
Two years ago, when conservatives controlled the court, the justices restricted the use of dropboxes. The ruling said they could only be placed in local election clerks' offices, and a voter had to return their own ballot in person. However, when Justice Janet Protasiewicz was elected last April, control shifted on the high court.
Nick Ramos, executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, is pleased with the decision and said his organization has known all along dropboxes are safe and improve voting access.
"They are a way that the electorate can access our democracy when it isn't necessarily so convenient," Ramos argued. "For our health care workers, the rural community, single parents out there."
Conservative members of the Wisconsin Supreme Court were against reviewing the case, stressing the significance of upholding and respecting legal precedent.
Luke Berg, deputy counsel at the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, condemned the ruling, calling it "one of the worst decisions from the court in recent memory." He is convinced it was political and not what he thinks a court should be doing.
"I think it's deeply ironic that the court announced, by judicial fiat, its policy preference on a voting issue on the same day that it issued an opinion praising separation of powers, and then violated those very principles in the other opinion it issued," Berg asserted.
Ramos maintained the decision to make ballot boxes more widely available sends a clear message not only to the people of Wisconsin but the entire country.
"Especially after the year we've had, with bringing new maps, after living under the extreme partisan gerrymander that we've lived under for over a decade," Ramos emphasized. "It's a message of hope."
Ramos added he is proud of the volunteers, activists and key organizations who worked to bring about the change.
Support for this reporting was provided by The Carnegie Corporation of New York.
get more stories like this via email