NEW YORK – Foundations receiving tax-deductible contributions are booming, but a new report says little of the new money pouring in makes its way to those working on social justice issues.
The National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy (NCRP) report says between 2003 and 2013, which included the Great Recession, the assets of the country's grant-making foundations increased by more than $320 billion.
But report author Ryan Schlegel says little of that new money reached those who suffered the most during that same decade.
"While grant-making from the 1,000 largest foundations in the United States for under-served communities grew by a little bit, about 5 percentage points, grant-making for social justice philanthropy was stagnant," he points out.
The report defines "social justice organizations" as not-for-profit groups working for structural changes that will benefit those who are least well off politically, economically and socially.
However, there are a few fundraisers that give half or more of their grants to social-justice organizations.
Maria Mottola, director of the New York Foundation, points out that her organization’s donors get tax breaks for the money they give which, in a very real way, makes it public money.
"So, if we are privileged enough to have control over it, we should be thinking about whether we're using it for the greater good, not just in ways that are self-serving," she states.
According to NCRP data, 61 percent of New York Foundation grants go to social-justice organizations.
But Schlegel notes that, in the 11 years of the study, the 1,000 largest foundations gave an average of less than one-third (31 percent) of their total grant-making dollars to under-served communities.
"And social justice grant-making was still only about 10 percent,” he states. “And both of those are pretty troublingly low when you consider the challenges that are facing those under-served communities, and our nation as a whole."
The NCRP report asks if foundations will continue to enjoy generous tax benefits in a political climate that's increasingly hostile to inequality, or if they can change course to better guard the public trust they've been given.
get more stories like this via email
Some New York House lawmakers supported a bill harmful to nonprofits. H.R. 9495 faced staunch opposition since it would have given the Treasury Secretary unilateral power to revoke tax exemptions for nonprofits considered "terrorist supporting organizations." The bill stems from a disinformation campaign saying Democrats support terrorists and would have jeopardized nonprofits providing aid to Palestinians in Gaza.
Beth Miller, political director with Jewish Voice for Peace Action, said this foreshadows Donald Trump's second term.
"It's very clear that the far-right MAGA Republicans are planning to take every step they can to dismantle our fundamental freedoms including our right to free speech, our right to protest, and attacking the nonprofit civil-society sector and social justice movements and progressive movements," she said.
This isn't the first time a bill like this was voted on in the House. H.R. 6408 passed the chamber earlier this year with staunch bipartisan support. But, it failed in the Senate. With H.R. 9495, 52 Democrats joined all Republicans in the chamber to vote in favor of it. Miller said with a GOP trifecta in Washington next year, lawmakers must watch out for double-edged legislation that could have harmless language and destructive consequences.
One reason so many Democrats support the bill is the other provision of it which gives tax breaks to Americans wrongfully imprisoned abroad or held hostage by terror groups. Miller noted that it's a perfectly sensible thing to pass on its own.
"However, if Republicans actually wanted to push that through, they could have pushed that through separately as a standalone bill and gotten total bipartisan support for it," she continued. "However, they tried to attach it to this other bill because what they really wanted to get through was the piece of this legislation that was all about giving the Trump executive branch more authority."
She added bills like this will be common and noted that Democrats are often too willing to sell out the Palestinian rights movement for the sake of bipartisanship.
Disclosure: Jewish Voice for Peace Action contributes to our fund for reporting on Civic Engagement, Human Rights/Racial Justice, International Relief, Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Maryland voters swung toward Donald Trump for president by nearly seven points compared to 2020, making the margins in down-ballot races a little too close for comfort for some Democrats.
The final results are still unofficial but they indicate Republicans had their best showing since 2014 in Maryland's rural 6th Congressional District. It still was not enough, however, as Democrat April McClain Delaney defeated Republican Neil Parrott, a former member of the Maryland House of Delegates.
James Gimpel, professor of government and politics at the University of Maryland-College Park, said Trump's stronger performance in blue states contributed to the close 6th District results.
"With Trump stimulating the turnout of the more rural counties, that's going to make that seat more competitive and more Republican," Gimpel explained. "Trump's performance, I think, has boosted the Republican prospects in some of these competitive races all around the country, Maryland included."
McClain Delaney won by nearly five points but the election was the closest win for a Democrat in the district since the "Republican wave" of 2014. The 6th District spans the Maryland panhandle and part of Montgomery County.
The Maryland U.S. Senate race also remained close, but Prince Georges County Executive Angela Alsobrooks, a Democrat, defeated former Republican Gov. Larry Hogan. Alsobrooks won by nearly 10 points. Gimpel pointed out Hogan's criticisms of Trump during his terms as governor may have alienated some supporters.
"He had sort of won the enmity of Donald Trump and presumably, many of Donald Trump's supporters," Gimpel observed. "You have to wonder if maybe he would have done better if he would have gone a little easier on Trump the last four or six years or so."
Hogan did win the governorship in 2018 by a wide margin as a Trump critic. That year, Democrats swept gubernatorial and U.S. House races across the country.
get more stories like this via email
This weekend, a new coalition called "We Are California" is holding meetings up and down the state, preparing to resist what it sees as anticipated attacks from the incoming Trump administration.
Hundreds of nonprofits have joined the coalition, whose mission is to promote inclusion, community and democratic norms.
Angelica Salas, executive director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles, explained the purpose of the coalition.
"What are we bracing for? Exactly what Donald Trump said he was going to do: mass deportations, family separation, worksite raids," Salas explained. "These are all things that he has done in the past. But what we're expecting and what we're bracing for is a scale of attack on our community that is unprecedented."
The coalition hopes by banding together, its members can fight any erosion of civil rights for LGBTQ+ people, immigrants and others. The gatherings this weekend will take place online and in person in the Bay Area, Fresno, Los Angeles, Orange County and San Diego.
Salas pointed out California has also put limits on how new immigration detention centers can be built.
"We can also model what it means to resist, but what it means to defy," Salas emphasized. "Because I think last time, we resisted. This time around, it's really about putting in place everything that interrupts this agenda."
In 2017, lawmakers passed the California Values Act, which said no state or local resources can be used to assist federal immigration enforcement and declares schools, hospitals and courthouses as safe spaces. And the California Trust Act said jails should not hold people with low-level nonviolent offenses past their initial detention period solely to give the feds time to initiate deportation proceedings.
get more stories like this via email