COLUMBUS, Ohio -- Opposition is mounting to a plan to charge Ohioans to bail out one company's aging nuclear power plants.
Senate Bill 128 in the Ohio Legislature would add a charge to people's electric bills to subsidize plants owned by FirstEnergy, a company that provides power to about 2 million residential consumers. FirstEnergy has said its nuclear plants are an important part of the clean energy picture in the state.
But Trey Addison, associate state director at AARP Ohio, said for customers, bills would increase on average almost $60 a year for up to 16 years - a real burden for people on fixed incomes.
"This is something that we continue to see. FirstEnergy has recouped billions of dollars from ratepayers in the state of Ohio, more so than any other utility,” Addison said. "So, it's just unacceptable again, now they're seeking a legislative solution. 'Bob and Betty Buckeye' have had enough."
Addison said there's no need for Ohioans to pay above-market rates for power, and that deregulation of the electric industry is working. A joint study of deregulation by Ohio State University and Cleveland State University found Ohioans saved nearly $12 billion between 2011 and 2015, and are projected to save another $12 billion through 2020.
Addison likens FirstEnergy's request to a homeowner wanting others in their neighborhood to pay for improvements so the homeowner could make more money in a real estate deal.
"It's unfortunate that you would go on the record and say, 'We're likely going to end up selling the plant anyway, so let's 'profit up' financially so we can get the highest dollar amount for it - on the back of the consumer,’” he said.
Instead, Addison said, FirstEnergy could sell its power to other buyers at a premium price. Another utility, Excelon, recently did that in Illinois - announcing it would sell power from its Byron nuclear plant to Michigan and other states, rather than seek a bailout.
Other states have decided to let their aging nuclear plants close without bailing them out.
get more stories like this via email
This is National Consumer Protection Week, and the Arizona PIRG Education Fund wants people to think about what they can do to protect their valuable documents - both physically and digitally.
The group is offering a new guide to help. The fund's consumer privacy director, R.J. Cross, said it is smart to "disaster proof" documents in case of an emergency such as a wildfire or flood.
She said now is the time to make a plan so you can save yourself a headache down the line.
"Having digital copies of sometimes your Social Security number or having your birth certificate can make it easier for you to navigate the process of those insurance claims," she said, "and the process of getting replacement hard copies if you're in that situation."
She added that when deciding to store documents online "in the cloud," it's a matter of determining the right combination of security and convenience. She recommended using a cloud service that offers what's known as end-to-end encryption.
The guide is online at pirg.org/resources.
Cross explained that end-to-end encryption offers an extra layer of protection, but it does come with a tradeoff: Once you've encrypted your files, you can't afford to lose your encryption key. If so, she said, you won't be able to access your documents.
"When you go from an end-to-end encryption, it is really secure, so secure that even the company that owns the cloud isn't going to be able to help you if you lose that key," she said. "So you do want to take good care of it."
She suggested printing out the encryption keys and keeping that paper in a safe place.
Cross said she realizes some people may not entirely trust a cloud service. That's why she also suggested scanning documents and loading them onto an encrypted thumb drive.
"Probably the last thing you want to do is be standing in line to get a new copy of your marriage license," she said. "The question is, how can I ameliorate the odds that I am going to add way more on my plate after a disaster than I have to?"
Disclosure: Arizona PIRG Education Fund contributes to our fund for reporting on Civic Engagement, Consumer Issues, Energy Policy, Urban Planning/Transportation. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
As National Consumer Protection Week continues, watchdogs remind policymakers about the alarming presence of scams targeting the general public. In Kentucky, a bill addressing gift-card scams cleared a legislative hurdle this week. Two years ago, Americans lost a record $10 billion in scams, and authorities say gift cards that are tampered with - before they're purchased - are one way in which consumers are being defrauded.
Gary Adkins, volunteer state president with AARP Kentucky, said these are the gift cards you typically see on kiosks in retail stores. When no one is looking, the scammers obtain sensitive information from the back of the item.
"And once the card is activated, these scammers can collect money off that," he explained.
Meaning the intended recipient can't use the card, and the person who bought it lost money that's hard to recoup. The Kentucky bill, approved by the state Senate Tuesday, would elevate this crime to a "Class D" felony. Opponents of a similar bill worry about unintended consequences because of language that says a person found with at least two tampered cards is presumed to be up to no good.
Beyond policy action, Adkins said all populations need to get this on their radar by loading up on helpful tips to avoid being scammed. Organizations like his are teaming up with the law enforcement community to share that information, so that the current crisis doesn't grow into something even worse.
"It's an all effort in order to try to help protect our folks that are here in the Commonwealth," he continued.
For gift-card scams, experts say safeguards include double checking the balance right after purchasing it and holding on to the receipt. Later this spring, AARP will host informational events around Kentucky. Times, dates and registration details are on the group's website.
Disclosure: AARP Kentucky contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy & Priorities, Health Issues, Senior Issues, Urban Planning/Transportation. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
March is Problem Gambling Awareness Month, and it remains unclear if Minnesota will legalize online sports betting. Research is emerging about whether players in other states are simply having fun with it or if there are troubling patterns.
Since a federal ban on sports betting was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2018, more than 30 states have legalized it, with many opening up access to online options like FanDuel.
Justin Balthrop, University of Kansas finance professor, helped lead a study into the relationship between placing sports bets online and the added financial stress for vulnerable households.
"It's extremely concerning to me to know that money is being taken from longer-term savings vehicles and put into something that is more or less guaranteed to grind down to zero over the long term, if you keep betting," he explained.
In other words, the research says sports betting isn't simply substituting for other discretionary spending. Balthrop's study found a 14% reduction in net investments among households using these apps.
Researchers are not taking a stance on these laws, but want to inform policymakers as they discuss things like adding safeguards. The Minnesota Legislature has debated the issue but has yet to get a bill across the finish line.
Balthrop said he understands the pressure legislators feel to legalize sports betting and not lose revenue to neighboring states. But as they consider the idea, he urged them to think about future scenarios -- such as the loss of personal savings pushing more people into social assistance programs or food banks.
"If that increases tenfold in the future, then those are tax monies that are going to need to be spent in the future that maybe outweigh the benefit in the short term," he continued.
Other early research indicates online sports gambling isn't creating widespread problems yet. However, Balthrop hopes for more studies that look into how friends and family are affected by excessive betting.
Meanwhile, separate findings from experts in California reveal lower credit scores and increased bankruptcy filings. Industry leaders say regulatory structures in active states prevent users from being exploited by illegal markets.
get more stories like this via email