COLUMBUS, Ohio -- Opposition is mounting to a plan to charge Ohioans to bail out one company's aging nuclear power plants.

Senate Bill 128 in the Ohio Legislature would add a charge to people's electric bills to subsidize plants owned by FirstEnergy, a company that provides power to about 2 million residential consumers. FirstEnergy has said its nuclear plants are an important part of the clean energy picture in the state.

But Trey Addison, associate state director at AARP Ohio, said for customers, bills would increase on average almost $60 a year for up to 16 years - a real burden for people on fixed incomes.

"This is something that we continue to see. FirstEnergy has recouped billions of dollars from ratepayers in the state of Ohio, more so than any other utility,” Addison said. "So, it's just unacceptable again, now they're seeking a legislative solution. 'Bob and Betty Buckeye' have had enough."

Addison said there's no need for Ohioans to pay above-market rates for power, and that deregulation of the electric industry is working. A joint study of deregulation by Ohio State University and Cleveland State University found Ohioans saved nearly $12 billion between 2011 and 2015, and are projected to save another $12 billion through 2020.

Addison likens FirstEnergy's request to a homeowner wanting others in their neighborhood to pay for improvements so the homeowner could make more money in a real estate deal.

"It's unfortunate that you would go on the record and say, 'We're likely going to end up selling the plant anyway, so let's 'profit up' financially so we can get the highest dollar amount for it - on the back of the consumer,’” he said.

Instead, Addison said, FirstEnergy could sell its power to other buyers at a premium price. Another utility, Excelon, recently did that in Illinois - announcing it would sell power from its Byron nuclear plant to Michigan and other states, rather than seek a bailout.

Other states have decided to let their aging nuclear plants close without bailing them out.


get more stories like this via email

Washington is one of 25 states where people can use the online "IRS Direct File" system, to file their income-tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service. But the future of the program is at risk.

For years, taxpayers' advocates had pushed for a free, simple tax-filing option for people who don't need a third-party tax preparer. But the Trump administration has said Direct File may be a waste of IRS resources.

Casey Lantz, free tax preparation campaign coordinator with the United Way of King County, said it is time for people to voice their support for the program. She's used Direct File and says, since the program auto-fills tax information from forms like W-2s, filing her income taxes this year was the easiest it has ever been.

"I think it's exactly what people wish tax filing was like. And I think the only chance we have of stopping them from cutting it is if enough people say something," she explained.

Direct File guides users through simple questions in English or Spanish, and offers live chat support in both languages. People can check their eligibility and get more information online at 'DirectFile.IRS.gov.'

Adam Ruben, vice president of campaigns and political strategy with the Economic Security Project, said the process removes intermediary tax preparers and uses information the government already has to make it easier to file federal and state tax returns. Ruben explained Direct File is for people with straightforward tax situations, such as employees who get a W-2 from their employer.

"Direct File is not yet available for freelancers or gig workers, or people with complicated investments or who work across multiple states," he continued.

Lantz said even if you are not eligible for Direct File, you can still use it to file an income-tax extension by April 15.


get more stories like this via email

Pennsylvania is among a growing number of states offering residents access to the Internal Revenue Service's free tax filing system, Direct File.

The online tool was created to save people both time and money by allowing them to file directly with the IRS while removing the need for costly tax-preparation services.

Lucas DeBartolo of East Stroudsburg said using Direct File was easy and recommended it for people looking to take advantage of available tax credits.

"And it could be hundreds to thousands of dollars back in their pockets," he said, "and this software is really good at seeing what tax credits people qualify for."

It's estimated about 20% of eligible taxpayers don't claim the Earned Income Tax Credit. DeBartolo said using Direct File was quicker than other online tools he's used and appreciated his quick refund.

Americans on average spend at least 13 hours filing their taxes each year. Direct File cuts down on that time by autofilling information the government already has, allowing users to simply verify its accuracy.

Adam Ruben, vice president for campaigns and political strategy at the Economic Security Project, said the program is user-friendly with no hidden fees and is available in English or Spanish.

"If you get stuck, there's free live chat support in both languages," he said, "and importantly, unlike most other tax software, it will also help you file your state tax return for free."

Ruben said Direct File is not yet available for freelancers, gig workers, people with complicated investments or those who work across multiple states. He said people can check their eligibility and get more information at the IRS website.


get more stories like this via email

Public hearings continue tonight and tomorrow for the proposed sale of Minnesota's second largest utility. The deal is drawing a lot of attention, with a private-equity firm behind the request. Minnesota Power serves more than 150.000 electricity customers in the northeastern part of the state.

If regulators say "yes," its parent company ALLETE would be sold to BlackRock's Global Infrastructure Partners and the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board.

Stephanie Kiero, a customer in this service area, said she worries about her rates going up for the wrong reasons.

"It seems to me like another case of 'the rich get richer' when things move in the private equity direction. I think there's different expectations about profit from private equity," Kiero said. "I mean, it's about 'make the most profit that you can in the shortest amount of time.' "

Analysts view this as a bellwether because these types of deals don't surface all the time. Minnesota Power does not anticipate customer rates being impacted, and it says this deal guarantees more resources in meeting the state's clean-energy goals amid spiking demand.

Tonight's hearing led by the Public Utilities Commission is online and runs from 6 to 8 p.m. Tomorrow's hearing is from noon to 2 p.m. at the Morrison County Government Center in Little Falls.

As for the clean-energy claims, skeptics say the deal undermines such efforts because of the buyer's link to fossil fuels. Hudson Kingston with the environmental group CURE also worries about transparency.

As a company with a public focus, ALLETE has almost immediate reporting requirements when issues arise. But Kingston warns that might change if this sale goes through.

"If they have accounting mistakes, if they have major shortfalls, that might not come out until an annual report to the PUC," he said. "So, that's very concerning. It really pushes a lot of their management into the shadows."

Minnesota Power contends it will continue as an independently operated, locally managed and regulated utility. Feedback from the hearings will be factored into the commission's decision, expected this fall. Meanwhile, Kiero says this is a polarizing issue in her community.

"I've talked to people who work at ALLETE that are super excited about the sale. I've talked to other people who just absolutely are against BlackRock's involvement with Enbridge and their track record with the environment," she said.

Enbridge is the Canadian oil company that operates the Line 3 pipeline across northern Minnesota.