HARRISBURG, Pa. – Public lands, national parks and monuments add billions of dollars to the economy and create thousands of jobs in Pennsylvania, according to a recent analysis.
Saying their size and number interfere with development, the Trump administration ordered a review of 27 national monuments to either shrink or eliminate protected areas.
In response, congressional Democrats on the Joint Economic Committee released a state-by-state fact sheet on the economic impact of public lands.
It shows that in Pennsylvania, 19 national parks attract 11 million visitors a year, increasing the state's economic output by almost $750 million.
Joe Demalderis, owner of Cross Current Guide Service, says that's a lifeline in some rural parts of the state.
"The land is valuable for the local economies because of the tourism it develops, and it's in areas where there really isn't much else for the local people, for their economy," he points out.
Overall, outdoor recreation generated more than $21 billion in consumer spending in Pennsylvania in 2012.
U.S. Sen. Martin Heinrich, the ranking Democrat on the Joint Economic Committee, notes that, in his home state of New Mexico, two areas designated as national monuments may be threatened by reduction or elimination.
"We have seen tourism go up, we've seen visitation go up, we've seen local gross receipts and lodgers' taxes and business development because of these monuments,” he points out. “So to turn that back would be an enormous mistake."
According to the fact sheet, every tax dollar invested in the National Park Service yields $10 in returns.
Demalderis says protecting areas such as the 35 miles of river in the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area means more than figures on a ledger sheet.
"People who live in metropolitan areas have places they can go and decompress, and go back to their everyday life and be more productive at what they do,” he states.
The Department of the Interior is expected to issue a decision on the 27 national monuments currently under review by late August.
get more stories like this via email
People in Colorado and seven other Mountain West states may want to see changes in the federal government writ large but they oppose cuts to agencies charged with protecting public lands, wildlife and other natural resources, according to the latest Conservation in the West poll by Colorado College.
Dave Metz, partner and president of FM3 Research, said vast majorities support agencies including the National Parks, Forest Service, and Fish and Wildlife Service.
"When we ask people whether they would support or oppose reducing funding to these agencies, the answers are overwhelming, they would oppose such cuts," Metz reported. "Three quarters of Western voters overall express opposition and that sentiment is thoroughly bipartisan."
The survey was conducted before the Trump administration fired thousands of federal National Parks and Forest Service workers. The Department of Government Efficiency, led by Elon Musk, has defended its efforts as necessary to eliminate what it called "waste and fraud."
Kathryn Hahne, director at New Bridge Strategy, said support for federal agencies is also strong among MAGA supporters. Among those surveyed, eight in 10 said they approve of the National Park Service.
"Seventy-four percent approve of the U.S. Forest Service, 71% approve of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services, and 69% of MAGA supporters oppose reducing funding to those agencies," Hahne explained.
More than seven in 10 people surveyed do not want additional public lands opened up for drilling and mining, and 63% oppose reducing Endangered Species Act protections. Metz added awareness on the threats posed by climate change has increased by 22 points since the first poll 15 years ago.
"We now have more than three quarters of Western voters who are telling us they view climate change as a serious problem," Metz observed. "When you look at Gen Z voters, 90% of them tell us they view it as a serious problem."
get more stories like this via email
In its 15th annual year of polling on Conservation in the West, the State of the Rockies Project this year has found support for conservation by some of the highest margins to date and notably across party lines.
Pollsters have always asked respondents to identify their political parties, but 2025 marked the first year respondents could affiliate with the 'MAGA' movement. Results showed regardless of affiliation, support for conservation is strong.
Kathryn Hahne, director at New Bridge Strategy, which conducted the poll, noted 69% of MAGA supporters oppose reducing funding to federal agencies managing public lands and wildlife.
"Among MAGA supporters, 81% approve of the National Park Service, 74% approve of the U.S. Forest Service, 71% approve of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and 46% approve of the EPA," Hahne reported.
The poll results come as the same federal agencies earlier this month began laying off permanent employees and freezing seasonal hiring as part of an effort led by billionaire Elon Musk to cut federal spending. The Forest Service fired roughly 3,400 employees and the Department of the Interior fired about 1,000 National Park Service employees and 800 Bureau of Land Management employees, including many in Montana.
The Trump administration released an order to "review and, as appropriate, revise" designations of national monuments, a power which has been exclusive to U.S. presidents for 120 years.
Lori Weigel, partner at the polling firm New Bridge Strategy, said Westerners across the board, including and 87% percent of Montanans, support keeping national monuments.
"There's really no subgroup within any of the data that is saying we ought to remove those designations," Weigel noted.
Nearly all surveyed Democrats across eight western states support keeping national monument designations, as do 83% of Republicans and 81% of MAGA Republicans.
get more stories like this via email
Conservation of public lands remains a top priority for westerners, according to a new poll.
The "Conservation in the West" poll from Colorado College has looked at sentiments toward public lands for 15 years. Eight Mountain West states were part of the research this year, including Idaho.
Among Gem State respondents, 90% told researchers they want to keep national monuments established in the last decade in place.
Lori Weigel, partner at the polling firm New Bridge Strategy, said Republicans, Democrats and Independents agree on the issue.
"This is another case where we see, really across the partisan spectrum, that respondents are telling us, 'No, we want to keep those national monument designations in place,'" Weigel reported.
Idaho voters voiced concerns about habitat loss for fish and wildlife in the poll, and also said they oppose reducing protections for rare plants and animals on the endangered species list. And nearly three-quarters of respondents said they support only allowing energy companies to drill where there is a high likelihood of oil and gas.
Idahoans are less worried about climate change than other parts of the West, with 43% saying it is an "extremely" or "very" important issue.
Dave Metz, partner and president of FM3 Research, noted Idahoans feel more confident in local officials' response to the crisis than in states like Arizona or New Mexico.
"The highest degrees of confidence we see are in Utah, Wyoming and Idaho," Metz noted. "There is the geographic difference there. More northern states within the region are expressing more confidence than some of the southern states."
Metz added there's support for Native American tribes to have a bigger role in managing public lands.
"That sentiment cuts across racial and ethnic lines," Metz stressed. "It's basically nine out of 10 voters, regardless of their racial and ethnic background, who want to see more participation from tribes in making these kinds of decisions."
get more stories like this via email