COLUMBUS, Ohio – Analysts say another month of slow job growth in Ohio shows that cutting taxes for those with the highest incomes isn't putting people back to work.

The state gained only 1,600 jobs in July for a 12-month growth rate of just under 1 percent – less than two-thirds of the national average.

According to Hannah Halbert, a researcher with Policy Matters Ohio, the disappointing figures come after years of tax breaks favoring corporations and the wealthiest Ohioans.

"A lot of these cuts were made on the promise that if we cut taxes and make it a business friendly environment, we're going to see more robust job growth,” she points out. “And, so far, that just hasn't panned out."

The number of people working or looking for work in Ohio fell by 16,000 in July, and the unemployment rate increased to 5.2 percent.

Low-paying service sector jobs did increase last month, but there were fewer construction and manufacturing jobs.

And Halbert points out that public employment, funded by tax dollars, increased by more than 4,000 jobs.

"That's one other reason having adequate state revenues to fund those public services are important,” she stresses. “Not just for the services, because those are jobs, and that's money coming into our economy."

Halbert adds that cutting taxes means less state revenue to invest in priorities like public infrastructure – investments that can target regions and communities that have been left behind.

But at both federal and state levels, the focus on tax cuts continues.

Halbert notes that in Ohio almost 40 percent of President Donald Trump's proposed tax cuts would go to people earning more than $1 million a year, saving them thousands.

"For folks making less than 45,500 bucks, the average tax cut for that group of folks is going to be about $240," she points out.

Halbert suggests that federal lawmakers study the experience in Ohio before implementing tax changes that overwhelmingly benefit the wealthy.

This collaboration is produced in association with Media in the Public Interest and funded by the George Gund Foundation.


get more stories like this via email

A new federal proposal to protect workers from extreme heat is being hailed as a potential lifesaver by labor advocates, even as Florida faces backlash over its heat safety rollbacks.

The proposed OSHA regulation is open for public comment until Dec. 30. It could bring long-awaited protections to millions of workers exposed to dangerous temperatures.

Micki Siegel de Hernández, national deputy director of occupational safety and health for the Communications Workers of America, said Florida recorded more than 200 heat-related worker deaths between 2010 and 2020 and she is baffled by a controversial law Gov. Ron DeSantis signed in April to block local municipalities from enacting protections for workers.

"That bill also prohibits any kind of training or posting of information. It's insane," Siegel de Hernández asserted. "It's disgusting and insane, and also blames workers in the event that they do suffer from some kind of heat-related illness."

DeSantis had sidestepped criticism of the bill by saying it did not come from him. Under the proposed OSHA rule, employers would be required to implement heat illness prevention plans, including access to water, rest breaks and shaded areas.

Siegel de Hernández noted many of Florida's workers, especially those in outdoor industries like construction and agriculture, are at risk of heat exhaustion and heat stroke.

"All of these things are preventable and without a standard, workers will continue to die," Siegel de Hernández contended. "We need to get something passed as quickly as possible."

The OSHA rule would mark the first federal legal protections for indoor and outdoor workers exposed to extreme heat. If approved, it could go into effect as early as next year.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health has recommended heat safety standards since the 1970s. But this is the first time the U.S. government has proposed comprehensive heat safety regulations applicable to most industries.


get more stories like this via email

A new study showed as Texas has emerged as a national leader in wind turbine and solar energy installations, clean energy workers often face dangerous working conditions and unequal pay.

The report from a pair of advocacy groups found few Texas job sites are unionized and workers often receive low pay and lack access to benefits like health insurance, workers' compensation and retirement plans.

Bo Delp, executive director of the Texas Climate Jobs Project, said with unions on the rise in Texas and elsewhere, clean energy job sites need to give workers a voice in determining their working conditions.

"We know unionized workplaces have fewer accidents and have less income and racial inequality," Delp pointed out. "One of the things that's needed is for policymakers and for employers to lean in to that support for collective bargaining that we're seeing across the country."

The report was produced by the Texas Climate Jobs Project and the Cornell University Climate Jobs Institute. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics said while union membership is on the rise in Texas, it remains one of the least unionized states. As a so-called "right to work" state, Texans do not have to join a union to get a job.

The report found work-related injuries are common on industrial-scale work sites, including those where solar panels and wind turbines are installed.

Avalon Hoek Spaans, assistant research director for the Climate Jobs Institute at Cornell University and the study's co-author, said the research showed there were often few work rules designed to prevent injuries on job sites.

"One in four workers have experienced work-related injuries on a clean energy Texas worksite and almost half of all workers surveyed have suffered a heat-related illness," Hoek Spaans reported. "Forty-eight percent of our sample had experienced a heat-related illness, 26% an injury, and 7% saw a fatality."

The study also found rampant racial inequality on job sites, with Black workers making an average of $8,500 a year less than white workers, Spanish speakers made $5,900 less and women made $2,700 less. Workers also said employers often refuse to pay overtime.

New research shows the gender wage gap widened for the first time in two decades.

The Census Bureau found full-time working women make 82.7 cents for every dollar a man makes, down from 84 cents for every dollar in 2022.

Connecticut echoes the trend statewide, particularly in the public sector workforce.

Jamila K. Taylor, president and CEO of the Institute for Women's Policy Research, said states can enact policy solutions to address pay equity issues.

"Factoring in things like access to child care, the affordability of child care," Taylor suggested. "We know that child care is much more expensive in this country. There have been conversations nationally about price gouging and the price of groceries even though, you know, we know the economy has cooled down."

While the economy is growing stronger, she noted some sectors are still recovering from the pandemic. Child care affordability problems existed before the pandemic and were only exacerbated.

Taylor feels one way Connecticut and the nation can help close the gender wage gap is by expanding their respective child tax credits. Affording child care improves women's ability to make sufficient wages to meet their needs and those of their families.

The Census Bureau data showed minority women are earning far less. Black women working full-time make 66.5 cents for every dollar their male counterparts make. For Latina women, it's less than 60 cents for every dollar.

Taylor pointed out several challenges are preventing the gender wage gap from closing any further.

"We still need the political will to broadly support addressing the gender wage gap in this country," Taylor argued. "Better access to higher paying jobs, you know, particularly for women is important."

If the gender wage gap continued on the same slow but steady narrowing trend, all women workers would have reached pay equity with men by 2088. Pay equity between all full-time year-round workers will take over 30 years, finally coming to fruition in 2066.