CONCORD, N.H. – Civil-rights advocates are optimistic that New Hampshire's transgender non-discrimination bill may soon be law.

The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing Monday on House Bill 1319, which would protect transgender Granite Staters from discrimination in employment, housing and public accommodations. This is the third time this bill has come before the state Legislature.

Linds Jakows, campaign manager for Freedom New Hampshire, points out that it passed the House by a wide margin with the support of 50 Republicans, and there are three Republican co-sponsors of the bill in the Senate.

"We're cautiously optimistic but we really want to make sure that this passes," Jakows says. "So we'll be working hard to share our stories with every single senator to gain as much support as possible."

Gov. Chris Sununu is expected to sign the bill when it reaches his desk. Opponents of the bill claim that transgender people using gender-specific facilities will pose threats to privacy and safety.

But Jakows counters that experience has shown such fears are unfounded.

"In the 18 states and 200 cities and towns that have already passed this, there has been no increase in safety incidents so these laws have existed for a long time and the sky hasn't fallen," Jakows notes.

They add that transgender people are much more likely to be victims of assaults in public restrooms.

Opponents of the legislation also claim that transgender people already are protected by sex-discrimination laws. But Jakows says those protections aren't always enough, and HB 1319 would take away any doubt that transgender people are covered.

"It will make 100 percent crystal clear in New Hampshire state law that transgender people should be protected from discrimination in employment, housing and public places just like all other Granite Staters are right now," states Jakows.

The full Senate must vote on the bill by May 3.


get more stories like this via email

January is National Human Trafficking Prevention Month. In South Dakota, the push to secure justice for Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women remains a priority, but some call for more resources.

This crisis has garnered more attention at the national level in recent years, including the 2023 launch of an outreach program led by federal authorities.

South Dakota is a host district for one of the handful of U.S. attorneys assigned to this effort.

While that extra leadership might be helpful, Tanya Grassel-Kreitlow - a coordinator with the South Dakota Network Against Family Violence and Sexual Assault - said there still isn't enough funding to accelerate meaningful progress.

"We are desperate for funding," said Grassel-Kreitlow, "and without funding, we are not able to provide advocacy to work with the families of the missing, and to work with the potential victims - who we've identified through a lot of factors who have the potential to become missing."

She spoke during a forum last week hosted by the South Dakota Humanities Council. Panel members also said agencies still don't share enough intelligence to prevent crimes.

Funding came up during a Congressional hearing last fall, and a key lawmaker pledged a bigger level of support moving forward.

But it's unclear what that will look like when budget negotiations resume in the spring.

Lily Mendoza is a 2024 Bush Fellow and is the founder of the Red Ribbon Skirt Society out of Rapid City.

She said federal officials have improved their listening efforts when grassroots groups speak out on this issue.

And the Society reports good relationships with local law enforcement - but Mendoza said her team still has to fill in gaps to ensure accountability.

"You know, 'I got a call from a parent. They're concerned about their child. Can you check into this?'' said Mendoza. "So, those systems that the Not Invisible Act is supposed to be putting in place, the grassroots organizations are taking that on."

Mendoza said she does applaud a specialized federal unit, that launched in 2021, that can more freely navigate the country to help look into these cases.

According to federal data, 40% of all victims of sex trafficking are identified as American Indian and Alaska Native women.




get more stories like this via email

Today is International Human Rights Day, and much attention has been paid to North Dakota's growing refugee population and an assistance group suggested more individuals will resettle here, creating a number of positives.

In the federal fiscal year that recently ended, the organization Global Refuge said North Dakota welcomed more than 280 refugees, nearly double the previous year.

Dan Hannaher, North Dakota field director for the nonprofit, said there is room for more with employers clamoring for individuals to fill open jobs. He emphasized by welcoming new populations and helping them meet basic needs right off the start, local economies function better.

"Whether it's manufacturing, health care, retail, refugee resettlement and immigration is a key to our economic success," Hannaher contended.

Like other support groups, Hannaher stressed there is a difference between illegal immigration and programs allowing foreign-born individuals to seek a new life in America. He pointed out refugees are here legally but are still sometimes disparaged for "looking different."

State officials have prioritized linking new residents with job opportunities and Hannaher stressed as global conflicts evolve, it is likely more people fleeing those areas will need attention here.

Internationally, one of the main themes for this year's Human Rights Day is correcting misinformation and countering disinformation. Hannaher said even as refugees begin carving out new lives and play a role in their communities, some of their neighbors might still be overcoming preconceived notions.

"So often I feel that is the key to our problem is that it's difficult to recognize the unknown and understand it and get to know it," Hannaher observed.

Around the globe, countries taking in refugees have cited the need to address housing shortages as they try to accommodate new populations. North Dakota government has been brainstorming ideas on broader housing needs, with a series of recommendations recently unveiled.


get more stories like this via email

Ohio voters are facing significant challenges at the ballot box, with some groups expressing concerns over voter roll purges and gerrymandering affecting representation, particularly in Black and other communities of color.

The issues draw attention to Ohio's "use it or lose it" policy.

Molly Shack, executive director of the Ohio Organizing Collaborative, said the policy affects marginalized groups more than others. She explained some voters, especially in underserved communities, may feel disappointed by a system when it does not meet their needs, resulting in fewer people voting and a higher chance of them being removed from the voter rolls.

"Ohio has purged literally millions of voters over the last decade and most recently, close to 160,000," Shack pointed out. "Those are policies that allow voters to be removed from the rolls not because they are ineligible citizens who can't constitutionally cast a ballot but because they haven't voted in a while."

Critics like Shack argued Ohio's current electoral practices contribute to voter suppression, disproportionately affecting low-income individuals, working-class citizens, voters of color and young voters, especially in districts already burdened by participation barriers.

Advocates also expressed concern about Ohio's persistent gerrymandering issues.

Bria Bennett, communications director for the Ohio Organizing Collaborative, asserted such practices dilute Black voter influence by packing and splitting urban areas, a tactic known as "cracking and packing."

"When we're thinking about gerrymandering, many times, that dilutes the Black vote," Bennett observed. "So think of your urban centers, you're packing all your votes into one area so that, yes, that voting block is together. However, it is diluting it everywhere else."

As Ohio voters prepare to decide on Issue One, supporters see the measure as a crucial step toward a fairer, more representative democracy.

Advocates for a voter bill of rights, currently stalled in the Supreme Court, continue to raise awareness about the barriers faced by some communities, emphasizing the need for comprehensive voting reforms to ensure access across the state.


get more stories like this via email