Desde el comienzo de la pandemia, varios estados han aprobado leyes de "personal seguro" destinadas a equilibrar la proporción de pacientes y enfermeras en los hospitales. En Pensilvania, defensores de la atención médica están pidiendo a los legisladores que voten sobre la legislación que permanece estancada en el comité.
El Proyecto de Ley 240 del Senado, también conocido como Ley de Seguridad del Paciente, establecería límites del número de pacientes que una enfermera es responsable durante un turno.
Maureen May de la Asociación de Personal de Enfermería y Profesionales Afines de Pensilvania dice que se trata de garantizar resultados positivos para los pacientes.
"Quiero estar en una cama de hospital en la que sepa que hay suficientes enfermeras para cuidar de mí y de mis familiares," dice May. "Quiero ser una enfermera que trabaje en un hospital y se aleje de la cama al final del día y sabiendo que hice todo lo posible para asegurarme de que mis pacientes recibieran la mejor atención posible."
Muchos administradores del sistema de salud se oponen a la legislación sobre personal seguro, diciendo que es costosa para sus resultados. El Proyecto de Ley del Senado 240 y su acompañante el Proyecto de Ley de la Cámara 106, que tiene más de 100 copatrocinadores, han sido remitidos a los respectivos comités de salud y esperan una votación.
La senadora estatal Maria Collett dice que la pandemia expuso grietas en el sistema de atención médica y la necesidad de una legislación como la Ley de Seguridad del Paciente. Ella dice que ha sido decepcionante ver la legislación estancada por algunos legisladores, dado el apoyo bipartidista para el proyecto de ley.
"Si usted es alguien que no va a apoyar a las enfermeras, que no va a apoyar a los pacientes, entonces ponga su nombre en el registro," pide Collete. "Vote no a este proyecto de ley porque las personas de nuestras comunidades merecen saber cuál es nuestra posición cuando se trata de proteger a los pacientes y proteger al personal de enfermería que trabaja arduamente."
Un estudio de 2017 encontró que los pacientes tenían muchas más probabilidades de sobrevivir cuando las enfermeras tenían una relación paciente-enfermera exigida por el hospital. La relación paciente-enfermera también se ha asociado con tasas significativamente más bajas de paro cardíaco, neumonía adquirida en el hospital, insuficiencia respiratoria y caídas de pacientes.
get more stories like this via email
After more than 50 years of use, some Michigan lawmakers say naloxone may not be the best choice in an overdose situation.
Naloxone is sometimes called the "Lazarus drug" because of its powerful ability to seemingly resurrect people after a drug overdose.
Sen. Kevin Hertel, D-St. Clair Shores, and some of his colleagues have introduced a bill which would open the door for what they say are more costly, but more powerful, antidotes.
"Given the prevalence of fentanyl in our communities, and how much stronger some of these drugs that we're now seeing are, we believe -- and in talking with others -- that there should be other tools to respond to an overdose," Hertel explained. "To make sure we're doing everything we can to save somebody's life."
Not everyone is on board with the proposed legislation, Senate Bill 542. Opponents argued the more expensive naloxone alternatives are not necessary, and using them would only increase profits for the pharmaceutical industry.
Jonathan Stoltman, director of the Opioid Policy Institute in Grand Rapids, said while the naloxone alternatives do help in overdose situations, they can also cause nasty side effects.
"The newer approaches, they put people into more severe withdrawal," Stoltman pointed out. "That's a pretty profound negative side effect. The one approach is very inexpensive and works great; the other approach is far more expensive and has this strong negative side effect."
Sponsors of the bill say they're hoping to give Michigan residents a chance to chime in on the issue in a public hearing sometime in June. Michigan saw more than 3,000 opioid overdose deaths in 2021.
get more stories like this via email
New Mexico saw record enrollment numbers for the Affordable Care Act this year and is now setting its sights on lowering out-of-pocket costs - those not reimbursed by insurance. More than 56,000 New Mexicans are enrolled in a medical health insurance plan on the state exchange - an increase of 12,000 people overall.
Colin Baillio, deputy superintendent with the state's Office of Insurance, said the state has boosted its outreach and made efforts to improve the overall consumer experience.
"We saw a 40% year-over-year increase, and New Mexico saw the biggest percentage increase during the open-enrollment period among all of the state-based marketplaces," he explained
Part of the enrollment increase is due to what's called the "unwinding" - a federal directive that required all states to redetermine Medicaid eligibility following a three-year pause on checks during the COVID pandemic. He said by using expanded tools made available by the federal and state government, 8% of New Mexico's population is now uninsured - down from 23% in 2010.
Following approval by lawmakers in the 2024 legislative session, the New Mexico governor signed seven health care-related bills into law - one of which requires annual reporting of prescription drug pricing. Baililo said the Affordable Care Act built the foundation that has allowed the state to pursue additional affordability initiatives.
"I'm really glad to see that there's so much interest in the next step of health reform, really leaning into these out-of-pocket cost issues and making it easier for people to afford to stay covered and see their doctors," he continued.
Two years ago, the state also passed a one-of-a-kind law that did away with behavioral health co-pays for people in certain insurance plans.
get more stories like this via email
New York's medical aid-in-dying bill is gaining further support. The Medical Society of the State of New York is supporting the bill. New York's bill allows terminally ill people with only six months to live to use this option, with safeguards requiring two physicians' approval.
The bill's Assembly sponsor Amy Paulin, D-Westchester, said despite the growing support, other hurdles lie ahead.
"Now we have what I believe, if it came to the floor, a majority. There's still a hesitation on the part of leadership. You know, we need members to assure leadership that they no longer have reservations," she said.
Other newly resolved concerns center on making sure insurance companies and doctors who don't support this aren't held liable. She's optimistic the bill will pass after nine years in the Legislature. New York would be the 11th state along with Washington, D.C. to have medical aid in dying legislation.
Corinne Carey, senior New York campaign director with Compassion and Choices finds the pandemic drew a vivid picture of a person's end-of-life experience. There were images of people dying on ventilators, apart from loved ones, and unable to communicate. She said people began thinking about a "good death."
"And, what is a good death is being surrounded by loved ones, having some measure of control, experiencing the touch of your loved ones, and being the one in the driver's seat," she explained.
Now people have different options for end-of-life care, each of which presents various challenges. Polls show medical aid in dying has garnered considerable support since being introduced in 2015. A 2022 Compassion and Choices poll finds 57% of nurses support medical aid in dying professionally, although fewer support it personally.
Disclosure: Compassion & Choices contributes to our fund for reporting on Civic Engagement, Health Issues, Senior Issues, Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email