More than three in five Utahns believe the state is on the wrong track and their quality of life is worse today than it was five years ago.
A new report by the Utah Foundation paints a bleak picture about how Utah residents feel about their home state. Data in the report found the cost of living and government dysfunction were the most important issues for Utah voters in 2024.
Rep. Robert Spendlove, R-Sandy, an economist for Zions Bank, said there is growing political and economic disenfranchisement among Utahns.
"People just don't feel like they have the opportunities that they've had in the past," Spendlove explained. "The rate of inflation has come down in the last year, but the overall price increase remains. So overall prices are up about 20% in the last five years and so people are really struggling to adjust."
Spendlove observed Utahns are struggling to adjust to having to pay approximately 20% more on things such as housing, food, gas and even car insurance. He suspects prices are unlikely to come down and contended Utahns' income needs to go up but added it will take time.
The report's authors said the data is useful for state leaders to understand the needs of Utahns and get the state on the right track and improve quality of life.
Ahead of this year's election in November, the report found other issues relating to political dysfunction included voters feeling ignored by politicians, government overreach and partisan politics were at the top of the list.
Spendlove noted it is why he supports Utah Gov. Spencer Cox's call to "Disagree Better." He pointed out while the initiative aims to improve attitudes and behaviors across the political spectrum by incentivizing consensus building, he is unsure whether policy solutions at the state level are being discussed.
"One of the questions is, 'Do we revisit how people get to the ballot?' 'Do we lower the threshold on signature gathering?' 'Do we have different models of primaries?'" Spendlove outlined. "It is kind of early in that discussion, but I think it is a really important discussion that we need to be having."
The report found voters who participated in the survey expressed frustration in not feeling heard and contend elected officials pay too little attention to voters in favor of corporations, religious organizations or special-interest groups.
get more stories like this via email
New Yorkers could benefit from a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rule. It caps credit card late fees at $8, or - at the credit card company's discretion - 25% of the minimum balance due.
Consumers in New York and across the country would save about $220 per year.
But Rebecca Garrard, deputy executive director of Citizen Action of New York, said the rule is under fire in Congress.
"We have a problem with some of our congressional representatives who oppose measures such as this," said Garrard. "It's both problematic from a policy standpoint - and quite frankly confusing from a political standpoint, when you think about what the will of their constituents are."
The House Financial Services Committee voted to overturn this regulation a few weeks ago.
Garrard and others ascribed this to committee members in New York and nationwide receiving money from corporate donors opposed to the rule.
Despite this, polls show reducing credit card late fees has strong support across party lines.
Aside from CFPB protections being under fire, the agency itself just survived a Supreme Court challenge from conservative groups.
Kimberly Fountain - consumer financial justice field manager with Americans for Financial Reform - said with the decision out of the way, the CFPB can get back to work.
"They're working on requiring fairer credit reports," said Fountain, "reducing the harm of medical debt collection, fighting inequity in home appraisals, increasing consumer rights to control their own data, and much more."
She said she expects battles on consumer protections to continue in Congress.
Other rules the agency worked on include closing a loophole exempting overdraft fees from Truth in Lending Act provisions.
In the early years of the pandemic, New Yorkers paid close to $1.5 billion in overdraft fees.
Disclosure: Americans for Financial Reform contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy & Priorities, Campaign Finance Reform/Money in Pol, Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Washington state is investing in bringing high-speed internet to more people in rural areas.
The Washington State Public Works Board has approved $20 million, largely in eastern Washington and in distressed areas for infrastructure projects to connect people to broadband internet.
Sheila Richardson, programs manager for the board, explained the need for the funding by many stakeholders.
"Cities, counties, ports, (planned unit developments), private providers," Richardson outlined. "They're all working really hard and being really creative on how they can leverage all these different funding sources to build out and make sure that these communities aren't getting left behind."
Richardson noted the funding will help connect about 6,000 people to broadband in the state. Washington also recently received approval of its proposal for the Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment program, which will allow the state to request access to $1.2 billion in federal funding to increase connectivity.
Richardson emphasized ensuring people are connected to high-speed internet is important for a number of reasons.
"It's going to impact the local economics if there's access to broadband," Richardson pointed out. "People are able to work from home. We know it increases home value. It really kind of levels the playing field for everybody in our state regardless of where you live."
Richardson added the Public Works Board has retained about $500,000 for replacing or restoring broadband in the event of an emergency.
get more stories like this via email
This week, Ohio approved adult-use marijuana sales as part of a 2023 ballot measure, with sales anticipated to start mid-June.
Ohioans age 21 and over can now legally purchase marijuana across the state. In December, a law was enacted allowing people to grow and possess marijuana, but with no legal avenues to purchase it. Gov. Mike DeWine and some Republicans sought swift action to prevent black market sales.
Jim Canepa, cannabis control superintendent for the Ohio Department of Commerce, said after years of experience in liquor control, his role is to fairly and responsibly permit folks who grow, process, sell and test cannabis.
"My focus right now is really on coming up with the rules that are required and set forth, and the timeline set forth, in the initiated statute," Canepa explained. "They are June 7th to have the applications ready, and September 7th to start issuing permits."
The Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review approved the rules without objection, enabling a dual licensing program for existing medical marijuana dispensaries to also sell nonmedical cannabis products.
Ariane Kirkpatrick, CEO of the cannabis company Harvest of Ohio, said her dispensaries are ramping up to meet the anticipated demand.
"How are we going to do staffing?," Kirkpatrick asked. "We're looking at parking, so, at the different ordinances of the cities of where we're located, to make sure we have the proper parking. Looking at drive-through, because some of our locations might have been limited already as far as capacity."
The new legislation allows for people age 21 and older to buy and possess up to 2.5 ounces of cannabis, or 15 grams of cannabis extract, and the home cultivation of up to six plants for personal use and up to 12 plants with two or more adults in the household.
Reporting by Ohio News Connection in association with Media in the Public Interest and funded in part by the George Gund Foundation.
get more stories like this via email