The Iowa Environmental Council has petitioned the Environmental Protection Agency to invoke emergency powers to protect sensitive soil and groundwater in northeast Iowa.

The council is holding a public webinar today and wants the EPA to address groundwater contamination in northeast Iowa's so-called Driftless region. The groundwater there has a well-documented history of nitrate contamination.

Alicia Vasto, director of water program for the council, said the highly porous and soluble karst soil prevalent in the region is susceptible to contamination from centralized animal feeding operations.

"We did some analyses of private well data and public water systems and found that there was a lot of contamination of nitrate in those drinking water sources," Vasto reported. "The state has really failed to take action meaningfully that would address those problems."

The state has said it is constantly working to upgrade groundwater quality standards and is in the process of taking public input on creating yet another set of rules.

Vasto emphasized since the state has failed to address the water safety concerns for decades, the council and a coalition of other environmental groups have, in effect, gone above the state's head to the EPA, asking the agency to implement an emergency stop gap on nitrate pollution the way the agency did in neighboring Minnesota last year.

"We're asking that at, at minimum, the EPA would require the state of Iowa to do what they required the state of Minnesota to do under the same petition," Vasto explained. "Because the geology of northeast Iowa is the same as of southeast Minnesota."

The council's recommendations include calling on the EPA to create a communications plan with residents whose water could be at risk, create a drinking water sampling plan, and establishing a thorough permitting process for centralized animal feeding operations.


get more stories like this via email

A new report finds that climate change is affecting weather conditions in ways that increase wildfire risk, with the West seeing the greatest jump in fire weather days in spring and summer.

Climate Central found that parts of Utah are experiencing around three more weeks of fire weather days during the summer.

Kaitlyn Trudeau, senior research associate in climate science with Climate Central, said fire weather refers to the meteorological conditions that kick start the spread of fire. And with Utah being one of the states seeing more days with persistent hotter temperatures, lower relative humidity and stronger winds, it's something that Trudeau says is worrisome.

"When we look at which variables, what's really changing this, we're seeing that it is really relative to humidity. We're seeing a huge increase in the number of these really dry days. One of the main reasons for that is climate change. It is getting warmer, it is quite warmer, especially in the Southwest," she said.

Trudeau added that warmer air can hold more water, and that as the temperature increases, the atmosphere gets thirstier, which can then pull more moisture out of the landscape. As increasing influence of human-caused climate change increases, Trudeau contends humans need to rethink their impact on the environment, and wants the report to serve as a wake-up call and help people understand risks where they live.

The U.S. Fire Administration has a list of seven steps communities can enact in an effort to be more prepared. Trudeau added that other fire-adaptation strategies include increased use of land-management techniques such as prescribed burns that eliminate excessive fuels, but even those have become more of a challenge.

"And in order to do prescribed burning, you have to have a very specific set of weather conditions, and they're basically the opposite of fire weather conditions, because it is really dangerous to burn anything when you have really hot, dry, windy days," she added.

Trudeau said as the number of fire weather days increases, it also decreases the ability to do things like prescribed burning. She encourages people around the country to create defensible space around their homes, as well as creating toolkits and an evacuation plan in case of an emergency.


get more stories like this via email

As West Virginia leads a group of states in a lawsuit against the Environmental Protection Agency's new emissions rules for power plants, a recent analysis highlights the voting records of the state's political leaders when it comes to environmental issues.

Jim Kotcon, chair of the West Virginia chapter of the Sierra Club, said the group's legislative scorecard shows nine state lawmakers consistently voted against environmental protection, with one even voting against their own leadership to take anti-environment stances. But he added, a surprising number of lawmakers have a strong track record for environmental protection.

"We were able to identify 10 legislators that had voted pro environment at least 80% of the time," Kotcon reported. "We think this is important information for voters and for constituents generally."

The scorecard includes votes on key environmental bills by all incumbent Delegates and Senators for the 2023 and 2024 legislative sessions. Bills were chosen based on roll call votes where a clear pro-environment position was identified, and where at least 5% of the chamber voted in opposition.

Kotcon added coal and gas bonding for mine or well reclamation continues to pose major environmental challenges to the region. Currently, companies are required to post a bond to ensure they reclaim their sites, but environmental advocates argued the bond amount, often less than $5,000, is not high enough, which can leave old gas wells and coal mine sites abandoned for years. He added state legislators have yet to address the issue.

"Unfortunately, the fossil fuel industry is strong enough in West Virginia that many of these very important bills to address very pressing public interest problems never even get to a vote."

There are more than 4,000 orphaned wells scattered across the Mountain state, along with hundreds of abandoned coal mine sites.


get more stories like this via email

A central Indiana university has taken the initiative to address environmental challenges on campus and in the nearby community.

Surveys conducted by Butler University have identified plenty of opportunities for cleaner energy and less waste. The school's goal is to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 45% by 2030 and 100% by 2050.

Julia Angstmann, executive director of sustainability at the university, said they got a jump on it with the university president signing a Presidential Climate Leadership Commitment back in 2012.

"That really was signed with the recognition that this is important work," Angstmann emphasized. "We have a duty to be a role model, both for our students and for our community, and to really try to meet these commitments in our larger care for the world and the environment."

The Office of Sustainability is the nucleus for the school's environmental transitions. Its agenda includes reducing solid waste and single-use plastics. Another project is to replant the university's historic Holcomb Gardens using all native plant species and landscape design from the Indiana Native Plant Society.

Butler's initial assessment showed, like most buildings, lighting, space heating and water heating are the biggest opportunities for reducing emissions. Angstmann explained the largest task will be energy focused.

"As we look at our decarbonization road map, we're going to be doing a lot of work around energy efficiency, LED lighting but also looking at renewable energy on-site," Angstmann outlined. "Things like solar panels on our campus."

The campuswide greenhouse gas emissions data is monitored and reported every year through an online public reporting platform, Antsgmann added. The school's location makes its progress part of the Thrive Indianapolis plan, created in 2019 to reduce greenhouse emissions citywide by 2025.