SEATTLE – Uno de los principales defensores del estado para la comunidad de extranjeros refugiados dejará su cargo el próximo mes. Con casi 40 años en Seattle como director ejecutivo de la oficina del “International Rescue Commitee”, Comité de Rescate Internacional (IRC, por sus siglas en inglés), Bob Johnson ya tiene una perspectiva de experto sobre las controversias de la migración. Tanto, que sus opiniones han ganado los titulares de los medios informativos.

Johnson observa el debate sobre inmigración nacional con la óptica de quien se ha dedicado a prestar ayuda y reubicar refugiados en los Estados Unidos. Ante la cercanía de su retiro, en enero próximo, hace memoria y comenta que ha visto varias olas de retórica anti-inmigrantes.

Pero sus recuerdos más vivos no son las controversias, sino los individuos que se han convertido en americanos… y que han regresado para darle las gracias.

“Creo que la gente de veras no ve los logros. Sólo ven los comienzos, cuando la gente está desconcertada y vulnerable, y tal vez todavía no habla inglés. El primer año es muy duro –todos los refugiados comienzan, en general, bastante pobres. Pero empiezan a subir y después de algunos años ya están de pie y en marcha.”

Hay oficinas del IRC en 22 estados y Johnson destaca que algunas han recibido amenazas por sus programas de reubicación. Pero agrega que en Washington el “99 por ciento” de las llamadas han sido de gente que quiere saber cómo puede ayudar.

Cita la larga historia del IRC asesorando a refugiados, que comienza en los 30s con gente huyendo de la Alemania Nazi. Dice que Washington fue parte de un importante campamento de reasentamiento luego de la evacuación de Saigón, en la guerra de Vietnam.

“En general Washington ha sido un muy buen estado para los refugiados, y lo ha sido desde 1975, cuando el entonces Gobernador Republicano Dan Evans trajo refugiados de Camp Pendleton, en California, al estado de Washington, e hizo una fuerte declaración de por qué necesitábamos hacer eso.”

Agrega que Washington es sólo uno de muchos estados que pueden ayudar con fondos a los esfuerzos de reasentamiento.

Johnson califica el debate actual sobre la migración como lleno de desinformación que alimenta la desconfianza. Pero también ve potencial de cambiar algunas mentalidades.

“Ya sabes, siempre habrá los que están contra toda forma de migración y contra cualquiera con aspecto diferente que venga al país. Pero creo que la mayoría eventualmente comprenderá un poco más el proceso y eso puede ser una buena oportunidad para educar a la gente en que comenzar no es tan terrible como pudieran creer.”

Aún retirado, Johnson afirma que seguirá de voluntario para ayudar en los nuevos arribos al Noroeste.
Información sobre el IRC, "International Rescue Commitee"(Comité de Rescate Internacional), en inglés: www.rescue.org.


get more stories like this via email

Advocates for immigrants are pushing back on a bill signed by Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds in the last few days of the legislative session, modeled on a recent, controversial Texas law.

Senate File 2340 gives local law enforcement officers and judges the authority to deport undocumented immigrants.

Erica Johnson, executive director of the Iowa Migrant Movement for Justice, argued the bill is an overreach, and said Iowa law enforcement officers are not authorized to enforce it.

"This is a pretty clear intervention into federal territory," Johnson pointed out. "U.S. immigration law is governed by federal law."

Much like the author of the Texas bill, supporters in Iowa blame the Biden administration for failing to slow illegal immigration, so the state has decided to take matters into its own hands.

Johnson contended the bill and other anti-immigrant sentiment during the just-completed legislative session target the very people Iowa, with its dwindling population, will depend on for its future workforce.

"What we need is communities that are safe, where workers have access to dignified, safe workplaces," Johnson emphasized. "The truth of what Iowa's future could be depends on immigrants and immigrant workers in our state, and unfortunately, this law could take us back, away from that possible future. "

Johnson added her organization will pursue legal ways to block the bill from taking effect in July.


get more stories like this via email

The future of Senate Bill 4 is still tangled in court challenges. It's the Texas law that would allow police to arrest people for illegally crossing the border. But groups are speaking out about the impact of "Operation Lone Star" on the youngest migrants. Governor Greg Abbott continues to bus migrant families to other states, many with young children - more than 100,000 families so far.

Robert Sanborn, CEO of Children at Risk, works to improve the quality of life for boys and girls in Texas, and contends the policy has put trauma on top of trauma.

"We never want children to be political pawns. We don't want maximum chaos on the backs of children. We want children to grow up and be assets for our community," he contended.

Sanborn points out that 2.2 million children in Texas are immigrants, and said it would be less stressful for kids if families were not bused in the middle of the night, and if they were allowed to pick their destination.

When immigrants arrive at the border, they are evaluated to determine if they're eligible for asylum.

Beatriz Zavala, clinical coordinator at El Paso-based Humanitarian Outreach for Migrant Emotional Health, or "HOME," said the children in this situation are at higher risk for mental health disorders.

"What is particularly troubling is the profound disregard for the stability and protection these families need. The impact on their mental health is undeniable. These are not just statistics. These are children, real children," she said.

As part of Operation Lone Star, families have been bused to Chicago, Denver, Los Angeles, New York City, Philadelphia and Washington D.C. The governor has said the practice is needed to keep the Texas-Mexico border safe.


get more stories like this via email

Legislation in Albany would create the first right to counsel for people in immigration court.

The Access to Representation Act would provide immigrants the right to an attorney in their New York immigration cases, ending the tendency to represent themselves if they cannot afford one.

Estimates show a backlog of more than 330,000 immigration court cases, and fewer than half have attorneys. Studies show without legal counsel, migrants are less likely to remain in the U.S.

Marlene Galaz, director of immigrant rights policy for the New York Immigration Coalition, described what the bill would do.

"It has a six-year ramp-up to start implementing and building infrastructure," Galaz outlined. "Having a pipeline between law schools for law students to go into immigration practice, and getting to nonprofits and so on."

Galaz noted most opposition centers around the $150 million to fund the program but pointed out the total expenditure is less than 1% of the state's $229 billion budget. She added anti-immigrant rhetoric has also damaged support for the bill. Currently, it is in the state Senate Finance Committee.

The New York City Comptroller's office said enacting the bill would benefit the state financially. It could keep about 53,000 people from being deported, which would result in almost $8.5 billion in local, state and federal taxes over the next 30 years.

Galaz emphasized the influx of migrants has saturated the court system, leading to what could have been an avoidable backlog.

"I firmly believe that if these investments had been made when we first asked for them, I believe, like, three years ago, then we wouldn't be struggling," Galaz contended. "We would have had the infrastructure built to address an increase in welcoming our newest neighbors."

A Vera Institute survey showed 93% of New Yorkers across party lines and regions support access to attorneys for all people, including those in immigration court, and government-funded attorneys for them.


get more stories like this via email