Madison, WI – A group of concerned educators is hoping to make the schoolyard bully go the way of the buggy whip and the five-cent candy bar. Name-calling and bullying in school can be devastating for those who are the target. No Name-Calling Week is aimed at focusing attention on the problem in Wisconsin and elsewhere.
Program spokesman Daryl Presgraves says the old "sticks and stones" adage just doesn't apply anymore.
"We think it's important that schools focus on finding ways that can ensure students tolerate and respect each other. It's really important students feel safe in school in order for them to get a proper education."
In many cases, Presgraves says, it's the student who is perceived as being different who is the target of abuse.
"This is something that is pretty much universal. Every student is affected by this, but certainly students who others view as different are most-often targeted."
In some cases people brush-off name-calling advocating "letting kids just be kids," adds Presgraves. He says, we have all probably been guilty of name-calling, but we have a responsibilty to teach children the difference between right and wrong. The impact that a bully has on a fellow student can have far-reaching consequences that could impact someone far beyond his or her school years, according to Presgraves.
"It isolates us, it puts us in a corner and it makes it difficult for us to learn and it makes it difficult for us to achieve as well as we can in school."
A study by Harris Interactive found that nearly half of the middle school students surveyed believe name-calling and bullying are serious problems in their schools. No Name-Calling Week is being promoted by the National Education Association and the National Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, along with 50 other organizations.
get more stories like this via email
Nevada leaders and community groups are pleased with this week's decision by state utility regulators to reject NV Energy's request to raise its basic service charge for Northern Nevada customers by 175%.
The final decision allowed an increase of the basic service charge by $2 a month, bringing the total to $18.50 a month for homeowners, matching the rate for Southern Nevada customers. The state's largest electric utility had asked to raise the basic service charge to just over $45.
Ace Patrick, board member of the Nevada Statewide Independent Living Council, said the initial request would have put a tremendous strain on many, including people with disabilities and on limited budgets.
"Many people here in my apartment complex are on a fixed income," Patrick pointed out. "You literally are deciding, 'Well, how hot can I tolerate the summers here?' And there are people here who I've walked into their apartments and it's been intolerable."
In a written statement, NV Energy said, "Our teams are in the process of analyzing the various components of the order and what it means to northern Nevada customer bills and rates. We appreciate the work of the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on this case." Changes go into effect Oct. 1.
NV Energy claimed the proposal was designed to help stabilize energy bills in Northern Nevada and protect the company's revenue streams from other competing forms of energy, like solar. Patrick contended the company is putting profits over the best interest of its customers.
"I've heard a lot of complaints about, 'Oh my gosh, the cost of utilities is just unreal - on top of rent, on top of everything else,'" Patrick noted.
Patrick added they receive assistance from the Reno Housing Authority but even so, their monthly income barely covers the rent. So, while a $2 increase may not seem like a lot, bills can quickly start to add up over time.
Disclosure: The Nevada Statewide Independent Living Council contributes to our fund for reporting on Disabilities, Poverty Issues, and Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Although classes are back in session, all New York City public schools still aren't entirely disability accessible.
Reports find more than two thirds of schools across the five boroughs don't comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The previous capital improvement plan invested $750 million for ADA school upgrades. But, this only made one third of schools accessible.
Molly Senack, education and employment community organizer with the Center for Independence of the Disabled New York, said this is unfortunate for students with disabilities.
"Those students are limited in the way they can choose what schools they want to attend," said Senack, "and it also means families and caregivers of students are limited in the way that they get to participate in their children's education."
Some groups want the city's Department of Education to allocate more than $1 billion for ADA compliance upgrades. Though this seems like a lot, it's making up for lost ground.
In 2015, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York reported the city failed to meet its ADA compliance requirements.
But Senack noted that the biggest challenge is staffing shortages throughout the Department of Education.
Beyond physical disabilities, New York City schools also face shortcomings in helping students with intellectual disabilities.
Reports show there aren't enough Special Education Certified teachers for students who need them. Senack said lacking professionals prevents some students from getting the education they need.
"For students with any disability," said Senack, "unfortunately, there is a pretty significant backlog in misrelated services where families have essentially filed complaints and requests for these missed services, and they are still waiting years later."
Lawsuits have been filed over the years to bring the city into compliance, though it's uncertain how effective those have been.
The most recent case relates to providing compensatory services for students who couldn't get regular school services during the pandemic.
Disclosure: Center for Independence of the Disabled New York contributes to our fund for reporting on Disabilities. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Utah lags behind the national average of identifying children for autism.
In an effort to improve the state's standing, the Institute for Disability, Research, Policy and Practice at Utah State University will offer free, remote early identification of autism training for Utah service providers.
Janel Preston, special educator at the university, said when early identification is missed, children and families are not getting critical services to increase overall quality of life.
"It is really important for providers, as well as just the general public, to have a better understanding of what autism is," Preston urged. "And how we can help support and increase that awareness, acceptance."
Data from 2020 show 10 Utah children per 1,000 were identified to have autism by age 4. The national average is more than 20 per 1,000. Preston pointed out the Autism ECHO sessions will start on Sept. 25 and will aim to give educators, providers, case managers, administrators and families the tools they need to improve identification.
Preston acknowledged it is hard to pinpoint why Utah falls behind in the early identification of autism but suspects it could be due to lack of access. She added in comparison to other states, Utah is pretty rural, which can pose unique challenges.
"If you live along the Wasatch Front you have access to a lot of things," Preston explained. "But coming maybe from San Juan County, that is a long drive into the Wasatch Front, which requires families to take time off from work, if you have a child that is not able to make transitions very easily that can then cause a ripple effect."
Preston added children who go years without being diagnosed can struggle to navigate interactions with peers, manage school work and get a job later in life.
Preston hopes the program provides all kinds of Utahns the ability to foster connections and community.
"I could say, 'Hey, I have this kid or this family, this is what is going on, what are some things that I could do? What are some resources that I might not be aware of?'" Preston emphasized.
get more stories like this via email