DES MOINES, Iowa - When kids act up, locking them up is the wrong thing to do, in most cases. That's the finding of
a new report from the Annie E. Casey Foundation. It says decades of research, along with new data, indicate that putting kids behind bars doesn't keep them from committing crimes later on. The report shows that incarceration doesn't provide public safety benefits, wastes taxpayer money, and exposes young people to violence and abuse.

Bart Lubow, director of the Juvenile Justice Strategy Group at the Casey Foundation, says that, in most juvenile cases, the "crimes" committed are minor.

"The majority are either charged with nonviolent offenses, or are there primarily for acts of defiance relative to an adult."

The report notes that several states are already moving away from relying on juvenile incarceration, mainly because of budget problems or scandals over abuse. It finds that more than 50 facilities have been shut down since 2007, nationwide.

In Iowa, no facilities have been closed because of budget concerns.

Dave Kuker, executive officer with the Iowa Division of Juvenile Justice Planning, says Iowa is one of the states that participate in the Casey Foundation's Juvenile Detention Alternative Incentive.

"The effort is really about asking communities to look at those kids that they want to lock up, and using as their their primary basis detention beds for kids that present a risk to public safety."

Bart Lubow says there's another aspect of the report regarding how kids end up in the juvenile justice system in the first place.

"The largest single source of new referrals to juvenile courts is public schools, enforcing zero-tolerance requirements and using police officers to supplant the disciplinary functions that schools used to exercise."

The report makes six recommendations to help states change systems.

The full report, "No Place for Kids, The Case for Reducing Juvenile Incarceration," is at www.aecf.org




get more stories like this via email

As pandemic-era protections were lifted a new report showed the number of children on Medicaid has varied widely between states, with Maryland doing better than most.

The Georgetown University report said nationwide, more than 4 million fewer children were enrolled in Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program at the end of last year compared to spring 2023, before the expiration of continuous coverage. The report estimated in 70% of cases, children's coverage was canceled for procedural reasons such as difficulty navigating the state's website, reaching a person via a help line, or not receiving renewal notices.

Joan Alker, executive director of the Georgetown University Center for Children and Families and the study's co-author, said states need to improve outreach to help avoid disenrollment because of red-tape reasons rather than being ineligible.

"Some states chose to go very slowly and carefully and redo their entire eligibility system so that it worked better," Alker acknowledged. "But other states really doubled down and they moved very quickly to disenroll children, even though many of them likely remain eligible."

In Maryland, the number of kids with coverage declined 3% or nearly 20,000.

The Maryland Children's Health Program offers free as well as low-cost health insurance coverage for children under 19, and income eligibility for children is much higher than for adults. The report noted new programs in some states are offering multiyear continuous coverage to young children.

"A significant number of states are making a shift in their policy to offer continuous coverage for young children," Alker pointed out. "In most cases, from birth to age 6, in a few cases to age 3 or 5. And this is a really terrific breakthrough."

Maryland is not among the 12 states to develop a multiyear coverage program but the District of Columbia has.

Medi-Cal has dropped several hundred thousand low-income children from the health insurance rolls since April 2023, according to a new report from Georgetown University.

The data show a net drop in children's Medi-Cal enrollment of 200,000 kids between April and December of last year, as the state started redetermining participants' annual eligibility - which had been paused to ensure continuous coverage during the pandemic.

Mayra Alvarez, president of the Children's Partnership, said another 100,000 have been dropped this year.

"Some 80% of the people that lose coverage in California are losing it for procedural reasons," said Alvarez, "not because they're not eligible but because their paperwork didn't make it to the county, or they waited too long on the line and got frustrated and had to hang up, or they moved and the letter never even reached them."

The state of California has made a massive outreach effort to keep those who are eligible covered.

More than half a million children, half of California's kids, depend on Medi-Cal. And three quarters of them are children of color.

It is unclear how many kids who lost Medi-Cal were later enrolled in private coverage.

Joan Alker is a co-author of the report, and executive director of the Center for Children and Families at Georgetown University. She said gaps in coverage can lead to long-term negative impacts.

"Kids are going to miss out on those well-child visits, they're going to miss out on getting the medications they need," said Alker, "be it an inhaler for their asthma or an ADHD medication. And that really sets them back, both in their health and their success in school."

A few years ago, California lawmakers passed a requirement for continuous coverage in Medi-Cal for children ages zero to five.

Alvarez said she is urging them to follow through and allocate $10 million in the next state budget to fulfill this mission.

After Texas, a new report shows Florida has seen the second-largest decline in the number of children enrolled in Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program.

Of the 4.16 million fewer children enrolled in Medicaid and CHIP nationally, Florida accounts for nearly 600,000 enrollment declines - according to a report by Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families, tracking the Medicaid unwinding since COVID-related coverage protections were lifted.

Alison Yager, executive director with the Florida Health Justice Project, said it's more like a crisis has been unfolding in Florida - and they've long been sounding the alarm.

"This, at its most extreme, can be a question of life or death, really," said Yager, "and short of that, we're seeing far too many families having to now scramble to figure out what's going to change in their monthly budget so they can now pay for whatever medication their kids require."

Yager cautioned that even if families qualify for one of Florida's KidCare programs, there are gaps in coverage.

Going without insurance, even briefly, can cause people to delay seeking care and leave them financially vulnerable when they do.

In February, the state sued the Center for Medicaid Services to stop them from enforcing 12 month continuous eligibility in the state's CHIP program.

The report is based on administrative data from the states to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Joan Alker - executive director of the Center for Children and Families at Georgetown - said Texas, Florida, Georgia and California accounted for half of the total national decline in kids with health insurance.

"This is a real crisis in these states for families whose children rely on Medicaid, but also for the providers that serve them - pediatricians and clinics," said Alker. "The system is really getting shaken up."

An April survey by KFF reveals that almost one fourth of adults who were removed from Medicaid - the program for low-income individuals - after pandemic-related protections ended last spring, now report being uninsured.