GARDEN CITY, N.Y. - New York does a better job than most states when it comes to caring for infants and toddlers who have been maltreated, according to a new study of child-welfare systems in 46 states nationwide. The report, commissioned by the Washington, D.C.-based group Zero to Three, pointed out that New York has a state-supervised, county-administered system, so child-welfare practices may vary by county.

The group's executive director, Matthew Melmed, said the Empire State does some things well and some not so well.

"Overall, there's a lack of real focusing on babies needing to be treated differently and to be a higher priority," he noted.

New York tries to make sure that when a baby is taken away from abusive parents, the first placement is the only placement, he said. It tries to see that a plan is in place to reunite the baby with its parents or, if that is not possible, ensure its adoption. Among things needed are after-placement case reviews more frequent than every three months, he said, adding that that's critical at a time when the brain is developing faster than any other time in a life.

Dr. Marcy Safyer, head of the Institute for Parenting at Adelphi University, said county-by-county, child welfare experts are working with judges and state officials to address the shortcomings.

"Everybody's really on board that kids develop very quickly, and we need to have a much stronger focus on them, and we need to provide better services for them and their parents," Safyer said.

Melmed pointed out that the Zero to Three study is not intended to be a report card on each state's child-welfare efficacy, but is an effort to identify and share innovations in practices and policies.

"Every seven minutes in the United States, a baby or a toddler is being removed from their parents because of abuse and neglect and being placed into the child-welfare system," Melmed said. "The systems themselves are not attuned to the developmental needs of these babies."

Safyer concluded, "What's very clear to me in New York is that it is always striving to do better."

More information is available at www.zerotothree.org.





get more stories like this via email

As pandemic-era protections were lifted a new report showed the number of children on Medicaid has varied widely between states, with Maryland doing better than most.

The Georgetown University report said nationwide, more than 4 million fewer children were enrolled in Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program at the end of last year compared to spring 2023, before the expiration of continuous coverage. The report estimated in 70% of cases, children's coverage was canceled for procedural reasons such as difficulty navigating the state's website, reaching a person via a help line, or not receiving renewal notices.

Joan Alker, executive director of the Georgetown University Center for Children and Families and the study's co-author, said states need to improve outreach to help avoid disenrollment because of red-tape reasons rather than being ineligible.

"Some states chose to go very slowly and carefully and redo their entire eligibility system so that it worked better," Alker acknowledged. "But other states really doubled down and they moved very quickly to disenroll children, even though many of them likely remain eligible."

In Maryland, the number of kids with coverage declined 3% or nearly 20,000.

The Maryland Children's Health Program offers free as well as low-cost health insurance coverage for children under 19, and income eligibility for children is much higher than for adults. The report noted new programs in some states are offering multiyear continuous coverage to young children.

"A significant number of states are making a shift in their policy to offer continuous coverage for young children," Alker pointed out. "In most cases, from birth to age 6, in a few cases to age 3 or 5. And this is a really terrific breakthrough."

Maryland is not among the 12 states to develop a multiyear coverage program but the District of Columbia has.

Medi-Cal has dropped several hundred thousand low-income children from the health insurance rolls since April 2023, according to a new report from Georgetown University.

The data show a net drop in children's Medi-Cal enrollment of 200,000 kids between April and December of last year, as the state started redetermining participants' annual eligibility - which had been paused to ensure continuous coverage during the pandemic.

Mayra Alvarez, president of the Children's Partnership, said another 100,000 have been dropped this year.

"Some 80% of the people that lose coverage in California are losing it for procedural reasons," said Alvarez, "not because they're not eligible but because their paperwork didn't make it to the county, or they waited too long on the line and got frustrated and had to hang up, or they moved and the letter never even reached them."

The state of California has made a massive outreach effort to keep those who are eligible covered.

More than half a million children, half of California's kids, depend on Medi-Cal. And three quarters of them are children of color.

It is unclear how many kids who lost Medi-Cal were later enrolled in private coverage.

Joan Alker is a co-author of the report, and executive director of the Center for Children and Families at Georgetown University. She said gaps in coverage can lead to long-term negative impacts.

"Kids are going to miss out on those well-child visits, they're going to miss out on getting the medications they need," said Alker, "be it an inhaler for their asthma or an ADHD medication. And that really sets them back, both in their health and their success in school."

A few years ago, California lawmakers passed a requirement for continuous coverage in Medi-Cal for children ages zero to five.

Alvarez said she is urging them to follow through and allocate $10 million in the next state budget to fulfill this mission.

After Texas, a new report shows Florida has seen the second-largest decline in the number of children enrolled in Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program.

Of the 4.16 million fewer children enrolled in Medicaid and CHIP nationally, Florida accounts for nearly 600,000 enrollment declines - according to a report by Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families, tracking the Medicaid unwinding since COVID-related coverage protections were lifted.

Alison Yager, executive director with the Florida Health Justice Project, said it's more like a crisis has been unfolding in Florida - and they've long been sounding the alarm.

"This, at its most extreme, can be a question of life or death, really," said Yager, "and short of that, we're seeing far too many families having to now scramble to figure out what's going to change in their monthly budget so they can now pay for whatever medication their kids require."

Yager cautioned that even if families qualify for one of Florida's KidCare programs, there are gaps in coverage.

Going without insurance, even briefly, can cause people to delay seeking care and leave them financially vulnerable when they do.

In February, the state sued the Center for Medicaid Services to stop them from enforcing 12 month continuous eligibility in the state's CHIP program.

The report is based on administrative data from the states to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Joan Alker - executive director of the Center for Children and Families at Georgetown - said Texas, Florida, Georgia and California accounted for half of the total national decline in kids with health insurance.

"This is a real crisis in these states for families whose children rely on Medicaid, but also for the providers that serve them - pediatricians and clinics," said Alker. "The system is really getting shaken up."

An April survey by KFF reveals that almost one fourth of adults who were removed from Medicaid - the program for low-income individuals - after pandemic-related protections ended last spring, now report being uninsured.