NEW YORK - Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced this week New York would raise the minimum wage by $2.50 an hour for waiters, bartenders and others who work for tips.

According to a coalition of organizations that lobbied for the increase, it's just one step in a longer fight. Maria Myotte with Restaurant Opportunities Centers United says their goal is much larger.

"It's definitely a step forward, not an end goal," she says. "Generally, across the country, our allies and the public agree that it is time to get rid of the two-tiered wage system altogether and pay all employees a regular minimum wage."

The Cuomo administration's move bumps the state's tipped minimum wage up to $7.50 an hour. It had been frozen at $5 since 2011.

Cuomo also said his administration would review whether to join other states in creating a single minimum wage that doesn't discriminate against tipped workers. Myotte says that's welcome news.

"Restaurant workers deserve fair wages and a stable paycheck and to work in an environment where the majority of their income is not from tips alone," she says.

In New York, minimum wage for non-tipped employees is $8.75. The increase for tipped workers takes effect at the end of the year. When it does, New York will rank ninth in the country for tipped wages, behind Hawaii and seven other states that have adopted a single minimum wage system.


get more stories like this via email

This Sunday, most of the United States will "spring forward" for daylight saving time, which means losing an hour of sleep.

Dr. Deepa Burman, associate professor of pediatrics and co-director of the Pediatric Sleep Evaluation Center at the University of Pittsburgh, said the time change disrupts the body's internal, social and natural clocks, and can lead to irritability and mood issues. She pointed out research also links the shift to workplace and economic effects.

"Studies have shown that in the United States, we actually lose anywhere from $400 million to $600 million a year because of not only loss of workplace productivity, because people are more tired at their workplace, but also increased calls of absenteeism," she said.

Burman noted the American Academy of Sleep Medicine supports permanent "standard time," arguing it is better for people's internal clocks. Some describe "springing forward" for daylight saving time as like shifting to a new time zone without traveling.

Burman emphasized daylight saving time may also be harmful to some people's health, as research has shown the chances of heart attack go up by 6% when people lose that hour of sleep.

"There is an increased risk of stroke by around 8%," Burman added. "Motor vehicle accidents actually increase by 6% in the week following the time change."

Burman recommended Pennsylvanians try adjusting to time changes with small steps, such as shifting your bedtime by 15 minutes each night before the time change, update nondigital clocks the night before, get plenty of morning light and dim screens in the evening.

Advocates for people with disabilities in Tennessee are concerned about the potential impact of a lawsuit challenging Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.

The Texas-led case, Texas v. Becerra, could weaken protections against discrimination for people with disabilities in federally funded programs.

Donna DeStefano, assistant executive director of the Tennessee Disability Coalition, warned that rolling back these protections could lead to widespread exclusion for people with disabilities. She emphasized that Section 504 has been a key Civil Rights law ensuring equal opportunities for individuals with disabilities.

"If somebody comes into a school situation or a health-care situation and has a disability, they're not automatically denied," she explained. "Pre-Section 504, there was no legal reason that people could not be discriminated against, and they were."

DeStefano noted that Section 504 was one of the first laws to support disabled civilians, thanks to Judy Heumann and fellow activists. Their record-breaking sit-in helped secure protections against disability discrimination in federally funded programs.

DeStefano noted anyone receiving federal funding cannot discriminate based on disability. During COVID, some people with disabilities were denied treatment at medical facilities, which violates Section 504. This led some states to update their crisis care standards to prevent discrimination.

"This law protects that, and this law looks now at increasing accessibility in medical equipment," she continued. "There are things like examination tables that are accessible, that can go up and down. There are weight scales that people could roll onto, if they were in a wheelchair."

DeStefano said Section 504 bans discrimination against people living with a disability by the federal government. This law, which predates the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act, ensures equal access. Eliminating Section 504 would remove key protections and allow disability-based discrimination.

A bill moving through the Alabama Legislature could change how people who are unemployed can qualify for benefits.

House Bill 29, sponsored by Rep. Ed Oliver, R-Dadeville, would require people getting unemployment to actively apply for at least five jobs per week, up from the current three.

Sen. Arthur Orr, R-Decatur, defended the measure during a public hearing Tuesday, arguing with 127,000 job openings across the state, it is a reasonable expectation.

"What are you doing for 40 hours? Let's just say it's an eight to five, an hour for lunch. What's the harm in requiring a fourth and fifth application in to find a job?," Orr asked. "Because we can't sustain people staying on unemployment forever."

Orr noted if the bill passed, the increased job search requirement would not apply to counties with populations under 20,000.

David Stout, legislative director for Alabama Arise, a nonprofit advocating for low-income and marginalized communities, argued Alabama already has some of the strictest unemployment rules in the country. He believes making the process even tougher will not necessarily push more people into jobs.

"People think that if you can just pass another more stringent bill, you're going to have people get a job. That's not so," Stout asserted. "If you look at unemployment rates in Alabama, it's about 2.8% in December. If you're drawing unemployment, you're looking for a job under already stringent regulations."

Sen. Linda Coleman-Madison, D-Birmingham, voiced concerns, warning the bill overlooks major barriers, like transportation and child care, making job searching harder for some.

"You may live in one end of the county but the job may be at the other end," Coleman-Madison pointed out. "We don't have infrastructure in place to support, like, public transportation, or transportation of any type."

The bill cleared a Senate committee, positioning it for final passage in the Senate. It has already passed the House.