BAKERSFIELD, Calif. - California Gov. Jerry Brown last week ordered the first-ever mandatory water restrictions in state history. The State Water Resources Control Board is imposing an immediate 25 percent reduction in water use among the 400 local water agencies around the state.
But Patrick Sullivan with the Center for Biological Diversity says the governor failed to include oil and gas exploration in his water cutback order, despite the massive amounts of water used in fracking operations.
"The oil industry is using some two million gallons of water a day in California for fracking and other types of oil extraction," says Sullivan, "and much of that water is contaminated and taken out of the water cycle for good."
Much of the area affected by fracking is in the southern San Joaquin Valley near Bakersfield, where Sullivan says frackers are often working in areas near farmers who, once again this year, are not receiving any water deliveries from the state because of the drought.
According to Sullivan, most fracking in California uses fresh water that could otherwise be put to use for drinking water or farming. He says the water situation has become so severe that in some cases farmers are using oil operations' wastewater on their crops - and that isn't all.
"There are hundreds of oil-industry disposal wells that are dumping contaminated oil waste into aquifers in places like Monterey County and Los Angeles and Kern County," he says. "Right now, across the state."
Sullivan says the state has done a poor job of providing oversight, and added that California doesn't have effective rules regulating water use by the industry.
"There are now some rules requiring disclosure of where they're getting water for fracking and what they're doing with wastewater after they're done," he says. "But there are no real restrictions on how much water they use and where it comes from."
California typically receives more than one-third of its water supply from melting snow in the Sierra Nevada mountain range - where this year, the annual snowpack was measured at a record low of eight percent of the normal snowfall in an average year.
get more stories like this via email
World Water Week is underway, as leaders forge discussions on the global water crisis. Supply issues aren't as urgent in North Dakota, but that doesn't mean conservation is an afterthought.
Dani Quissell - executive director of the North Dakota Water Education Foundation - said the state is lucky to sit on a more predictable water supply, namely the Missouri River, when compared to elsewhere in the U.S.
But she acknowledged that droughts in recent years serve as a reminder for state & local governments, and residents, to not take this precious resource for granted.
At home, she said basic conservation tips still apply.
"Being mindful on when we're letting the tap run where you're filling a pitcher," said Quissell, "and then you walk away for a minute to go let the dog out or something, keeping in mind that that water is running over and right down the drain."
She said that mindfulness should also come into play with other daily practices, like brushing your teeth.
As for policymakers, Quissell encouraged strong communication across various agencies - to ensure water supplies are prioritized when mapping out commercial and residential development.
Surging demand and uneven regulations have plagued western states as key water sources dry up.
Quissell argued that North Dakota closely monitors water use around the state. As climate change threats take shape, she said that has to be the approach moving forward.
"It's a mindset to have in wet periods and dry periods," said Quissell. "I think you build those habits over the long term. I think it's important to be thinking about being a good steward of the resource to have available for our children and our grandchildren."
Agriculture is one sector that has come under scrutiny for how it uses up water for food production. But Quissell said innovation and technology have helped to address that problem.
For homeowners irrigating their lawns, she urged them to run sprinklers at dusk or pre-dawn. That way, the water won't quickly evaporate in the midday heat.
get more stories like this via email
A new report finds pollution violations at wastewater treatment plants have been a problem in more than half of Idaho's communities.
The Idaho Conservation League's annual study of the state's sewage treatment plants says 58% violated Clean Water Act standards during 2023.
Will Tiedemann, the regulatory conservation associate with the Idaho Conservation League, said his organization didn't find much change between 2022 and 2023.
"It was kind of the status quo as continued from last year," said Tiedemann. "There were still a significant number of facilities across Idaho who violate. And of that, you know, it's usually ten, eleven, twelve facilities who make up the lion's share of that."
Tiedemann said his organization continued to study not just violations but loads over limits, or the severity of the violation.
Three facilities, in Driggs, Parma and Preston, accounted for about a third of total violations. On the positive side, 47 cities and towns did not report any violations in 2023.
Tiedemann said violations typically occur because of elevated levels of phosphorous or nitrogen from an excess of nutrients.
He noted that excess nutrients can create problems for water bodies, such as algae blooms.
"There are real world consequences," said Tiedemann, "for the environment and for recreation and for human health."
Tiedemann said violations occur more often in smaller communities - and there's a reason for that.
"Large cities in Idaho have a tax base to where they can have more advanced treatment systems," said Tiedemann. "They have more things to treat but they kind of have an outsized availability of resources to address that. But lots of smaller towns in Idaho don't always. They have limited budgets."
Disclosure: Idaho Conservation League contributes to our fund for reporting on Energy Policy, Environment, Public Lands/Wilderness. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
The Biden Administration is investing $105 million in water conservation and efficiency projects meant to shore up drought resilience, including more than $5.5 million for projects in Larimer, Montezuma, Montrose and Otero counties.
Zachary Hoylman, assistant state climatologist, said protecting water resources now and in the future will be critical for the nation's farmers and ranchers.
"Conservation is a really important piece of building resiliency," Hoylman explained. "Especially in an era of increasing variability in the climate system and longer term changes to the climate system."
The projects will optimize water deliveries to agricultural users, mitigate the risks of ditch failures by installing pipes, and install smart water meters. Shovel-ready projects in 11 states including Colorado are projected to save more than 111,000 acre-feet of water annually. One acre-foot is equal to more than 325,000 gallons of water, enough to cover a football field with one foot of water.
Hoylman pointed out there are many benefits to improving water transport efficiencies but it is also important to consider broader impacts. If you transport water by pipe instead of by ditch, it may be more efficient but it could also be taking water away from wetlands and waterfowl habitat.
"We can't only think about the human, socio-economic system," Hoylman argued. "There is really important feedback between the way that we divert water and the implications for ecology and ecosystems as a whole."
The investment taps funding allocated in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law passed in 2021. The Bureau of Reclamation is investing a total of $8.3 billion over five years for water infrastructure projects, including rural water, water storage, conservation and conveyance, nature-based solutions, dam safety, water purification and reuse, and desalination.
get more stories like this via email