CARLISLE, Pa. – A poll of national and Pennsylvania hunters and anglers has found
overwhelming support, even among self-described conservatives, for a controversial EPA clean water policy.
Commissioned by the National Wildlife Federation (NWF), the survey found support for an EPA plan to apply Clean Water Act protections to small headwaters and wetlands – something that had been under a legal cloud.
Ed Perry, a lifelong hunter and angler, works for the federation in Pennsylvania.
"Over 85 percent of Pennsylvania hunters and anglers support the rule," he says. "Overwhelming support, not only across the nation, but particularly in Pennsylvania."
Across the spectrum – age, sex, geography, political orientation – people surveyed said clean water is a top priority for them. Perry says three out of four Republican hunters and anglers across the country support the policy, and he adds that in follow-up conversations, one Republican fisherman said trying to protect major waterways without protecting their small tributaries is "stupid."
"Some of the comments were interesting," he says. "One Republican angler from Pennsylvania said protecting our fisheries and our drinking water should always be a priority."
According to the EPA, the clean water policy would help protect drinking water for nearly a third of Pennsylvanians. The agency says the policy would ensure protection of more than 40,000 miles of state headwaters, and half of its wetlands. Republican pollster Lori Weigel says part of the support among hunters and anglers seems to come from their personal connection to the waterways in question – making it a backyard issue for many of them.
"When we sat and talked to people in focus groups and open-ended discussions, they point to specific places that they know of that have benefited," she says.
While some industries have criticized the plan as over-regulation and congressional Republicans may attempt to overturn it, the NWF survey is the result of a partnership between a Republican and a Democratic polling firm. Both found strong support for the rule even among politically conservative outdoorsmen.
get more stories like this via email
Indiana is considering a limited bobcat trapping season and the Department of Natural Resources is seeking public input on the proposal.
The plan would allow trapping in about 40 southern Indiana counties starting in November 2025, with a statewide quota of 250 bobcats. Trappers would have a one-bobcat bag limit and be required to purchase a special bobcat license.
Geriann Albers, furbearer and turkey program leader for the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, said the proposal includes strict monitoring, and requires trappers to report their catches within 24 hours.
"We do have a population model for bobcats," Albers explained. "We're very confident with that 250 quota that it will not negatively impact bobcat populations. What that 250 was set on was the population model we have that shows that's a sustainable level of harvest."
Opponents argued even a limited season could threaten bobcat populations. Environmental groups, including the Humane Society, said the DNR's population model may not fully account for the bobcat's slow reproductive rate and threats from habitat loss. They contended reintroducing trapping could undermine years of conservation work that helped the species recover in Indiana.
Albers noted the DNR invited public feedback on the proposal.
"On that rule-making docket page the comment button is available for people to submit comments now," Albers pointed out. "That went up pretty quickly after the meeting but the first round of comments, we haven't scheduled yet because that usually coincides with when we do a public hearing."
A public hearing, tentatively set for November, will offer both in-person and virtual participation options. The DNR said updates will be posted on its website.
get more stories like this via email
Environmental groups are slamming a Biden administration effort to remove federal protections for the endangered gray wolf.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service just appealed a 2022 court decision reinstating protections for the gray wolf under the Endangered Species Act; protections lost in the Trump era.
Derek Goldman, Northern Rockies senior field representative for the nonprofit Endangered Species Coalition, said federal officials are making contradictory moves.
"On one hand, they said earlier this summer that they want to write a national recovery plan. But then they appealed to reinstate the Trump wolf delisting rule, which would presumably mean they don't have to do a recovery plan," Goldman pointed out. "This is kind of sending a mixed message here."
In the suit, Justice Department attorneys argued the gray wolf is no longer in danger of extinction. The National Rifle Association and hunting and livestock groups also supported the Trump-era policy, which would send protections back to the states.
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife said seven confirmed packs of gray wolves have made their way down from Oregon. Goldman acknowledged the wolves enjoy state-level protections but have a long way to go.
"They certainly haven't recovered throughout all the suitable habitat that's in California, like the Sierra Nevada mountain range," Goldman noted. "But without the resources provided by the Endangered Species Act, they won't fully recover."
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service set a deadline of December 2025 to produce a new federal gray wolf recovery plan.
Disclosure: The Endangered Species Coalition contributes to our fund for reporting on Endangered Species and Wildlife. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Following the torture of a wolf by a Wyoming man, a state panel is seeking a bill to protect the killing of predators with vehicles, but Federal lawmakers are pushing back.
After Cody Roberts in February hit a gray wolf with his snowmobile, taped its mouth shut and brought the injured animal to a bar, he was fined just $250 and an international outcry followed.
The gray wolf was removed from the federal endangered species list in 2021. In Wyoming, it is considered a "predator" and is legal to kill. The state's newly formed Treatment of Predators Working Group approved a bill, which clarified using vehicles to run over "predators," a practice called "whacking," is legal, as long as all "reasonable efforts to kill" the injured animal are then taken.
Elaine Leslie, retired agency chief of biological resources for the National Park Service, said Wyoming "sanctions this kind of behavior."
"The dialogue during that meeting was focused on, 'Oh, we can't identify or articulate the exact meaning of the word humane or ethical. So let's take that out of the bill,'" Leslie recounted.
In an opposing move, Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., last week introduced a bill to prohibit the intentional use of motor vehicles to harm wildlife on federal lands, establish a protocol for enforcement and penalties and maintain exemptions for human safety.
The bill is co-sponsored by legislators in North Carolina, Florida and Louisiana but notably none in the Mountain West, where the practice of "whacking" coyotes and wolves is legal in several states, as a practice distinct from hunting.
Leslie pointed out the behavior is likely happening elsewhere, too.
"We have no idea what the extent of this behavior is nationally," Leslie acknowledged. "I think it does need to have national attention and be a national bill right now."
A Wyoming legislative committee will hear recommendations from the Treatment of Predators Working Group Sept. 30.
get more stories like this via email