FLINT, Mich. - Some Flint residents say they are being forced to pay for poisoned water and they want it to stop. As state and federal leaders investigate and address the water crisis, people are receiving bills for water that has been contaminated with lead.
Joseph Morales of Flint says his family began using bottled water when they noticed the tap water didn't taste right and had an odor. And because they were not using the city's water, he stopped paying his water bill in July. Morales says two shut-off notices have arrived since.
"What are we supposed to do," he asked. "We can't use the water, it's tainted water, it's not fit for human consumption. Do we not pay it? Or are we being forced to still pay it anyway and that's the big question."
State Attorney General Bill Schuette this week said he's outraged that citizens are faced with bills for unsafe water, and is investigating ways to provide financial assistance to Flint residents. Today, a petition will be delivered to Flint's mayor calling for a moratorium on water bills and shut-offs.
With some residents refusing to pay their water bills, Flint leaders predicted this week that the city's water fund could be depleted by the end of the year. Rev. Deane Oliva, minister with the Unitarian Universalist Congregation of Flint, says state leaders need to act quickly.
"We have some of the highest water bills in the state, in the country," says Oliva. "It is unconscionable for people in the city of Flint to have to pay for water services, for water that they cannot bathe in, cannot cook with and cannot drink."
Michigan lawmakers are drafting a bill, supported by the governor, to provide $28 million in aid to address the water crisis, which could include $5 million to help Flint address unpaid water bills and new water infrastructure.
get more stories like this via email
Both water quantity and quality are important in the dry climate of Nevada. Now, a proposal from the Environmental Protection Agency could roll back protections for the state's water resources.
EPA administrator Lee Zeldin said he wants to reduce protections granted under the Clean Water Act in an effort to undo "unfair burdens" on farmers and landowners. The 1972 federal law aims to maintain and restore the nation's waters.
Natasha Majewski, climate and energy consultant for the Nevada Wildlife Federation, said the waters covered by the act have changed over the years, but it is all an interconnected system.
"Lincoln County doesn't have the same amount of resources as Clark County, and yet water is still flowing from that county into tributaries such as the Muddy River," Majewski pointed out. "That goes into the Colorado River. That will end up being drinking water."
In 2023, the Supreme Court narrowed the definition of "waters of the United States." It determined only wetlands physically connected to other federally-recognized waters qualify for protection.
Majewski noted while Nevada has its own water laws, federal regulation is needed to maintain a baseline for all states. This week, listening sessions about the proposal will be held for government agencies and Native American tribes.
The Trump administration has said it wants to reduce "red tape" for business and industry but conservationists fear loosening restrictions will cause more pollution in Nevada's wetlands and ephemeral streams. Majewski argued water should not be a partisan issue.
"It is important that all Nevadans, whatever kind of political side they are on, are able to understand these issues more," Majewski stressed. "Because water, it surpasses the administration that it's currently in."
Majewski added changing water protections could affect the quality of the Colorado River and would cause complications due to the amount of agencies managing the river.
"The Colorado River and its different tributaries that come in, it is such a patchwork of people that manage those water sources," Majewski explained.
Disclosure: The National Wildlife Federation contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Endangered Species and Wildlife, Energy Policy, and Water. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Montana officials have denied a petition asking the state to designate the Big Hole River as "impaired" by pollution.
Two conservation groups collected data over five years and found levels of nutrients in the Big Hole River exceeded thresholds, in some parts, by twofold or threefold, which could harm aquatic habitats, contaminate drinking water and affect fishing and other tourism business. The Montana Department of Environmental Quality said the petitioners used the wrong metrics.
Guy Alsentzer, executive director of the conservation group Upper Missouri Waterkeeper, said it is an example of politics "undermining good science."
"At minimum, we feel that the state owes us a written explanation, with some detail, about exactly why it believes it can deny a petition that has clearly satisfied the scientific basis for developing a pollution cleanup plan," Alsentzer explained.
The Montana Department of Environmental Quality argued the petition's data does not abide by a state law passed in 2021. The federal Environmental Protection Agency, however, officially disapproved of the law.
Alsentzer has requested the EPA weigh in, adding once high nutrient levels are proven, it is up to the Department of Environmental Quality to determine the causes.
"In the case of most Montana rivers, it's going to be a combination of human land use patterns," Alsentzer noted. "Sometimes it's subdivisions, sometimes it's septics, sometimes it's a municipality and sometimes it's farm fields or big cattle feeding lots."
Alsentzer stressed keeping waterways healthy is both "good common sense" and "good economics." According to the Bureau of Business and Economic Research, Beaverhead County's hunting and angling economy adds an estimated $74 million to area households annually and $167 million to businesses and organizations.
get more stories like this via email
A new report found 122 million Americans drink water with high levels of cancer-causing chemicals, frequently from runoff at livestock factory farms.
Researchers at the Environmental Working Group looked at water systems from 2019 to 2023. They found 6,000 water systems at some point had unsafe levels of "trihalomethane," which disinfects water contaminated with manure. The city of Baltimore and the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission tested above the Environmental Protection Agency limit for the chemical a combined 255 times.
Anne Schechinger, agricultural economist and Midwest director of the Environmental Working Group, said the pollution affects everyone in the state.
"You can live miles and miles from ag, but still have ag pollutants in your drinking water," Schechinger pointed out. "You might see this report and think, 'Well I live in a city. I'm not anywhere near ag.' That doesn't mean that livestock manure is not impacting your drinking water."
Higher trihalomethane levels in drinking water can cause colon or bladder cancer, heart defects and stillbirths.
Schechinger argued President Donald Trump could reduce pollution by unfreezing funds helping farmers use healthier agricultural practices. Funds are currently frozen as Trump's Department of Government Efficiency tries to cut spending it views as wasteful.
"We can be putting more conservation practices on farm fields, like stream buffers or grass waterways, that really stop the flow of manure into water," Schechinger recommended. "That's something that was intended for this year, but the Trump administration has frozen the majority of agricultural conservation funding."
Schechinger added consumers can protect themselves by getting a water filter. Filters can help take chemical runoff out of drinking water.
get more stories like this via email