PORTLAND, Ore. – A trio of widely-used pesticides threatens Northwest salmon and the orca that rely on them, even with these species on the brink of extinction.

That's according to a biological opinion from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's fisheries office that the environmental law firm Earthjustice unveiled this week.

The document is part of a 2017 court deadline requiring NOAA Fisheries to determine the threat these agricultural pesticides pose to salmon.

Glen Spain is Northwest regional director of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, which has been pushing back against the Environmental Protection Agency on the use of pesticides near rivers since a 2002 lawsuit.

"We require that our rivers, basically, are clean and that the salmon runs are healthy in order to survive as an industry,” says Spain. “And the idea of putting more and more toxic chemicals in our rivers without any analysis is appalling."

The report finds even low levels of runoff from these three pesticides – chlorpyrifos, malathion and diazinon – can cause abnormal development and impair the salmon's ability to swim. The document suggests prohibiting the use of these pesticides near salmon habitat.

The EPA asked for a two-year extension on the deadline for this biological opinion at the request of Dow Chemical, but that request was not granted. Spain says the EPA isn't doing its job to protect the environment, which hurts Northwest fishers.

"This administration is very gung ho on talking about jobs and economic impacts,” he says. “There is a huge economic impact on our industry, not to mention on the public health, of having rivers full of toxic chemicals that have been poorly tested or not tested at all and for which there are very simple solutions: to not put them in there in the first place."

The EPA had proposed to ban chlorpyrifos' use two years ago because of its harmful effects on children and workers who use the product. But the agency changed course when the Trump administration took over. EPA Chief Scott Pruitt says the agency will postpone a final decision on the pesticide until 2022.




get more stories like this via email

Beneath the glow of Miami's streetlights and the towering skyline, a rare species of bat clings to survival.

The Florida bonneted bat, one of the most endangered bats in the United States, faces mounting threats from urbanization and habitat loss.

Mylea Bayless, chief of strategic partnerships for the group Bat Conservation International, said conservation organizations are racing against time to protect the species and its fragile habitat.

"The largest population and the most dense population is right around Zoo Miami, which is right in the city of Miami," Bayless explained. "These bats really are endangered neighbors for many of the people that live in Miami, eating insects as they fly over the city at night."

There have been glimmers of hope. Last year, Miami-Dade County reversed a plan to build a water park near Zoo Miami, preserving a critical foraging area for the bats. Beyond habitat loss, the species faces additional challenges, including pesticide use and pollution, which threaten the native insects the bats rely on for food.

Bayless recalled a recent rally near Zoo Miami where she said hundreds of people showed up on a rainy Saturday to show support for the bonneted bats. They voiced concern about the Pine Rocklands, an endangered habitat the bats rely on, along with 23 federally protected species living there as well.

"The community of Miami really came out in force to advocate for the protection of Florida bonneted bats and their habitats," Bayless recounted. "We were really encouraged by all of the community support we received."

Bayless emphasized the need for long-term collaborations to protect the Pine Rocklands habitats and urges the public to appreciate their surroundings, highlighting the rare chance to spot an endangered Florida bonneted bat.


get more stories like this via email

Conservationists in New York and nationwide will celebrate the 51st anniversary of the Endangered Species Act on Saturday.

Since its passage in 1973, more than 1,600 species in the U.S. have been protected by the law. New York's piping plover and numerous other grassland birds have seen their populations rebound and backers credit this legislation.

Susan Holmes, executive director of the Endangered Species Coalition, said bald eagles are a great example of the law's conservation impacts.

"There are, in New York State, 425 breeding pairs, which means that if you're taking the Amtrak north to say Croton or going north along the Hudson, there's a good chance that you'll see a bald eagle," Holmes pointed out. "All of this is thanks to the Endangered Species Act."

As beneficial as the law may be, barriers prevent it from working to its fullest extent. Holmes noted the biggest issue has been getting sufficient funding. This year, advocates asked Congress to raise its funding by more than $840 million, which would fully fund the program. The amount would ensure each species has at least $101,000 for conservation and protection efforts.

Beyond funding, Holmes feels more people getting involved in wildlife conservation can help strengthen the law. When it first passed, it had overwhelming bipartisan support from Congress and the public. Though public support for the Endangered Species Act remains high, Holmes noted lawmakers' support has waned.

"We've seen some polarization around the Endangered Species Act itself," Holmes observed. "That's not reflected by the public's concern for wildlife nor the public support for the law. So, I think it's true, we are not seeing the same kind of support among Republicans for endangered species protection that we saw back in 1973."

She added it applies more to elected officials who are Republicans than the party's voters. For 2025, Holmes stressed threats from climate change and habitat loss will linger but she hopes there will be a recommitment to fully funding the Endangered Species Act to ensure more threatened plants and animals are able to thrive.

The United States has a national mammal, tree and flower but the status of America's most treasured bird was not always so clear officially or ecologically until now.

Last week, the bald eagle officially became the national bird of the U.S. More than 50 years ago, pesticide use had decimated bald eagle populations. Researchers recorded the lowest number of nesting pairs in 1963, at just 417.

Aimee Delach, senior policy analyst at Defenders of Wildlife, said pesticides like DDT worked their way up the food chain in a process known as biomagnification.

"A species like a bald eagle, which eats a lot of fish, they're essentially getting a dose from everything that those fish have eaten in their lifetimes," Delach pointed out. "Biomagnification is why these pesticide issues show up worst in some of the 'top of the food chain' animals, like bald eagles."

Delach noted pesticides interfered with the bald eagle's calcium levels, which caused eggshells to be weak and less likely to hatch. The federal government banned the use of DDTin 1972 and a conservation law brought the bald eagle back from the brink. In 1973, Congress passed the Endangered Species Act and ever since, bald eagles have made major rebounds.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service estimates the bald eagle population now stands at more than 300,000. Many people assume the bald eagle has always been our national bird but while it has been a symbol on our country's seal for centuries, it had never been officially designated.

Delach added the decision is long overdue.

"It's really fitting that the bald eagle be our national bird," Delach asserted. "There are almost 70 species of eagle across the world but the bald eagle is the only one that's found only in North America. So it really is our national bird, as far as its territory and range."

The Endangered Species Act will celebrate its 51st anniversary Saturday.