ALBANY, N.Y. – A "low-cost" option for development of New York state's offshore wind initiative would reap the most benefits - that's the message being sent to the Public Service Commission. A coalition of environmental, business and labor groups has submitted comments to the PSC on the development of the first 800 megawatts of wind power off New York's Atlantic coast.
According to Anne Reynolds, executive director of the Alliance for Clean Energy of New York, options that give developers the flexibility to deliver the most jobs, the biggest boost to the state economy and the lowest costs to consumers.
"If they have a contract that responds to the market, they can bid in a lower price," she says. "If they have to bid in one price for 20 years, they have to bid in the chance that something else will change in the market."
Gov. Andrew Cuomo has called for the first solicitation for offshore wind power to take place before the end of this year.
Offshore wind is critical to meeting the governor's goal of getting half of New York's power from renewable sources by 2030. But while New York has set a national tone for the development of offshore wind, Reynolds notes that other states aren't standing still.
"Massachusetts and Rhode Island just leap-frogged ahead of New York in terms of procuring new offshore wind, so we need to stay in that race so that we get the jobs here in New York, we get the port development here in New York," she explains.
An Alliance for Clean Energy analysis found that the offshore wind initiative could generate $6 billion in economic activity and more than 13,000 new jobs in New York.
Reynolds says the study also showed that no matter how the state achieves 50 percent renewable energy, offshore wind provides added environmental benefits.
"You still would avoid more pollution by having offshore wind because you're displacing those more polluting power plants located right in densely populated New York City," she adds.
She says the Public Service Commission may decide which option to pursue for offshore wind development by the end of the summer.
get more stories like this via email
Missouri homes and businesses have installed enough solar energy to power 68,000 homes each year.
A new report released by the Solar Energy Industries Association showed more than half of all solar installations in the United States have come online since 2020, with more than 25% installed since the Inflation Reduction Act passed almost two years ago.
Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the association, noted for Missouri farmers and rural residents, the most significant expense is power, needed for pumps, heating grow houses and running equipment.
"They're not paying for the sunshine," Ross Hopper pointed out. "And so, when they install solar to run their pump, or when they install solar on top of a chicken house, it saves an incredible amount of money because they are now using the sun to energize their system."
The report noted in 2012, only California had more than 25,000 solar systems installed. Today, 23 states and territories can make that claim, and 11 have surpassed 100,000 solar installations. More than 38,000 are in Missouri, which ranks 34th in the nation.
Ross Hopper emphasized not only is the growth in solar energy happening quickly, but it is sustained and she predicts it will continue to be.
"It took 40 years for the United States to install a million solar projects, and then it only took eight years to get to 5 million, and that is indicative of the rapid growth," Ross Hopper stressed. "We think it'll only take six years to get to 10 million."
She added the solar industry supports the careers of about 2,900 Missourians and has invested $1.6 billion in the state's economy.
get more stories like this via email
A new rule from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission could improve Virginia's electric grid transmission capacity.
It requires utilities and grid operators to plan 20 years ahead to accommodate expected changes in energy production. The rule is designed to help Virginia meet the high energy demands of the growing data center market and prevent service disruptions in extreme weather.
Nick Guidi, senior attorney for the Southern Environmental Law Center, said the rule will help the state reach its climate goals.
"For the first time in a lot of these states, the transmission planning process will have to explicitly take into account state goals and corporate clean energy goals," Guidi explained. "That hasn't really happened before."
He added the current process holds back state activity. The rule faced sharp criticism from FERC Commissioner Mark Christie. He characterizes it as a way to enact policies never passed by Congress and calls it "a blatant violation of the major questions doctrine." Guidi thinks it could lead to legal challenges.
Another new rule makes transmission siting easier.
Jon Gordon, policy director for the group Advanced Energy United, feels the FERC orders create advancements in transmission infrastructure development, calling it an arduous but necessary process to improve transmission capacity.
"I think as a country we've sort of gotten behind the 8-ball on upgrading our transmission infrastructure," Gordon asserted. "Now we've reached a point where we need to move quickly on transmission upgrades to ensure reliability."
He added more comprehensive long-term transmission planning is needed to ensure the lowest-cost transmission is built for reliability.
Virginia passed legislation making transmission easier. It comes as the state's grid operator, PJM Interconnection, which ranked poorly in a report due to a backlog of interconnection projects. The law means an additional 40% capacity for the current grid and saves the state congestion costs.
get more stories like this via email
A federal agency today is expected to announce reforms related to the power grid, which is stretched thin as the nation transitions away from fossil fuels.
It's a complex issue clean-energy advocates in the Midwest know far too well.
There's a push to expand transmission lines to accommodate the tidal wave of wind, solar, and other renewable projects.
Rules being unveiled could address the thorny issue of cost-sharing among states for the build-out.
More broadly, the Midwest Renewable Energy Association's Executive Director Nick Hylla said market dynamics are tricky - noting competing interests among utilities and developers in expanding the grid.
He said another issue is protecting wildlife.
"The history of management of transmission lines isn't some solid track record from an environmental-conservation point of view," said Hylla. "We could be doing a much better job in transmission corridors."
In these cases, decarbonization groups and conservationists are at odds with each other. Notably, a recent court ruling is allowing a transmission line project involving Wisconsin to advance.
Hylla said "non-wire alternatives" are emerging to help the movement without turning to the grid.
In Minnesota, Xcel Energy has been testing a program that incentivizes customers to curb energy use during peak demand.
Similar programs are taking shape elsewhere, but industry analysts say these initiatives are navigating their own barriers as they try to get off the ground.
Still, Hylla said an example of this approach along the East Coast is turning some heads.
"It's a BYOB program - Bring Your Own Battery program - that now, over 24,000 customers in three eastern states have subscribed to," said Hylla. "It's basically a subsidy to put a battery in your house and just to make sure that you're not using electricity in peak times. "
As governments, utilities and other entities face pressure to meet climate goals amid soaring demand for electricity, Hylla suggested these solutions will have to work hand-in-hand.
His group is focused on efficiencies, such as rooftop solar, to reshape the distribution of energy.
But he said large-scale renewable projects play a role, too, including the economic benefits for communities in which they're located.
get more stories like this via email
Contact
