CHEYENNE, Wyo. – Democrats and Republicans agree on climate change more than they might think, according to a new University of Colorado study, but forging a unified action plan continues to be a major challenge.
Leaf Van Boven, the report's lead author, says despite what is often reported about deep divisions among parties, the clear majority of Republicans, Democrats and Independents agree that climate change is a reality, that it threatens humans, and could be mitigated by reducing carbon emissions.
"Even though everyone agrees that climate change is a reality, Democrats and Republicans disagree about policies to mitigate climate change,” says Van Boven, a psychology and neuroscience professor at University of Colorado Boulder. “And the reason they disagree is because they disagree with ideas that come from the other side."
Van Boven says both Republicans and Democrats in the study believed that good policy should be enacted regardless of which party proposes it, but participants did not follow through on those beliefs.
Respondents were more likely to support proposals when they were told their side proposed it, and both parties rejected similar proposals if told they came from opponents.
Researchers surveyed more than 2,000 adults, along with four retired members of Congress – two Republicans, and two Democrats.
Van Boven notes most people assume that Republicans are skeptical of climate change, and as a result are less likely to speak up for fear of being excluded from the group. He says an important first step is to correct that mistaken assumption.
"Part of the solution has to be a readiness and willingness, if not an eagerness, to work with the other side,” he stresses. “It really seems to be a moment in time where Republican leadership is needed on climate change."
Van Boven argues because of the intense tribal nature of today's politics, the best way forward may be for Democrats to give Republicans a chance to offer up some solutions.
In a separate study, the National Surveys on Energy and Environment recently found that 73 percent of Americans now believe climate change is real, a new all-time high.
get more stories like this via email
On Election Day, a broad coalition of conservationists, labor, and others helped defeat a ballot initiative to repeal Washington State's Climate Commitment Act. The act, passed in 2021, is the state's state's primary vehicle for reducing emissions and pollution and a major source of funding for clean energy infrastructure and climate initiatives.
Billy Wallace, political and legislative director with the Washington and Northern Idaho District Council of Laborers, said passage would have meant the loss of as many as 45,000 clean-energy jobs.
"We started building a coalition, and it ended up being a little over 600 groups, from labor, from environmental. The Catholic Church was on it, We had 21 of the 29 tribes sign on. So it was a very diversified coalition that came together to save this funding." he said.
Initiative 2117 was one of four ballot measures backed by the Let's Go Washington PAC funded primarily by conservative hedge-fund manager Bryan Heywood. Wallace said that over the next 8 years, Climate Commitment Act investments would create 45,000 jobs in Washington State.
Wallace added the coalition faced an uphill battle to help the public understand that jobs and the environment were both on the line.
"These are the investments, even in schools, clean air, clean water. And once we figured out we got to educate the people on what's going on, it was complicated. It was confusing for the general public. So we raised $18.4 million for this campaign from that big coalition," he continued.
Climate Jobs Washington and its member unions formed a coalition to protect the act. Wallace said labor organizations were instrumental in passing the original measure three years ago.
"It was crucial for our members. Our members work in the building trades. About 75%, 80% of the work we do is on prevailing wage work in transpo[rt]. So it was a no-brainer for us to jump in," he added.
Disclosure: Climate Jobs National Resource Center contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Environment, Livable Wages/Working Families, Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
New research finds Maryland leading the nation in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Environmental Protection Agency data show between 2005 and 2022, greenhouse gas pollution fell in 44 states and the District of Columbia. Maryland saw the largest reduction at 36%, followed by D.C., Maine, New Hampshire and Georgia. Only six states saw emissions increase.
Emily Scarr, senior advisor for the Maryland Public Interest Research Group, said the wide variation between states shows local policy matters.
"It's really evidence that states and regions have a lot of control on their greenhouse gas emissions," Scarr explained. "Showing ways that we can continue to reduce emissions, as well as showing warning signs of things that states do that can actually take us in the wrong direction."
The reductions nationwide are largely attributed to the retirement of many coal-fired power plants. Maryland has shuttered seven coal plants since 2012, with two still operating.
The report looks at emissions data from power generation, industry, transportation, agriculture, residential and commercial sectors. Maryland saw emissions reductions in every category except for the commercial sector, which includes commercial buildings, landfills and wastewater treatment centers. Scarr pointed out fossil-fuel-based winter heating is driving emissions in the commercial sector.
"The majority of those emissions are actually coming from heat for commercial buildings," Scarr observed. "That's a specific place where, if properly implemented, the Building Energy Performance Standards can start holding commercial building owners accountable."
The Maryland Department of the Environment will collect energy-use data from buildings larger than 35,000 square feet in 2025, to develop energy performance standards based on those numbers. The state has set a 2040 target for large buildings to have net-zero emissions.
get more stories like this via email
Community members in Seattle had a unique opportunity to weigh in on the policies guiding the city's climate goals.
In 2019, the City of Seattle passed the Green New Deal Resolution and Green New Deal Executive Order, with the goal of eliminating climate pollution by 2030.
To help guide that process, the initiative's oversight board supported community assemblies.
Peter Hasegawa is the organizing director at MLK Labor and co-chair of the Green New Deal Oversight Board.
He said the idea behind the community assemblies was to do deep listening with many different community members.
"To have the opportunity to present information and get feedback," said Hasegawa, "and have people think about solutions together over a longer period of time, was appealing to us because we thought we could get higher quality feedback."
MLK Labor and Urban League of Metropolitan Seattle hosted the assemblies.
The goal was to ensure that people on the front-lines had their voices heard, and were at the table as the city crafts policies going forward.
Faduma Fido is lab leader with the People's Economy Lab, which helped support the community assemblies.
She said they're piloting this type of engage at the city level because people are tired of going to listening sessions.
She said the assemblies provide a more empowering setting, with people compensated for their time and eating meals together. Fido said they want to bring democratic practices like these back.
"There's an appetite and willingness now to empower the citizens," said Fido, "empower communities to practice democracy beyond the ballot box, because often that tends to be very polarizing."
Hasegawa said they heard from a variety of people over the three sessions.
In the first, they heard about people's experiences being affected by extreme weather, such as the 2021 heat dome, and a freeze last winter that caused many people's pipes to burst.
In the second session, they heard about wins on the ground to protect people and workers from the effects of climate change.
Hasegawa said in the third, they brainstormed about what the city and local labor movement can do about climate change.
"In certain ways that ended up being the easiest session," said Hasegawa, "because there was a very high level of consensus that what workers in Seattle want is to be protected from extreme weather, they want to be protected from heat and smoke, and bursting pipes, and they want to be protected whether they work in a building or outside or in a home."
get more stories like this via email