SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Una nueva iniciativa a votarse para 2020 cambiaría la manera en que California evalúa los impuestos a la propiedad comercial, reformando la Propuesta 13 para trasladar más de la carga fiscal a las corporaciones. Comenta Joshua Pechthalt (PESH-talt), presidente de la “Federación de Maestros de California” (California Federation of Teachers), organización que apoya el plan.

Los partidarios del impuesto a la propiedad comercial acaban de enviar 860 mil firmas a los registradores del condado para someter una iniciativa en la votación de noviembre 2020.

La medida a votar, “Primero las Escuelas y Comunidades” (Schools and Communities First), exigiría que los dueños de propiedades comerciales que se beneficiaron en 1978 con el congelamiento del impuesto a la propiedad por la Propuesta 13, comiencen a pagar impuestos con base en el justo valor actualizado de la propiedad, y no en lo que valía hace 40 años.

Joshua Pechthalt, quien encabeza la “Federación de Maestros de California” (California Federation of Teachers), dice que se elevaría en 11 billones de dólares al año, y sería una buena porción de lo que podría usarse para mejorar las escuelas.

“California es el estado que tiene la quinta economía más grande del mundo, y aún así estamos calificados cerca de la posición 45 en términos de gasto por alumno tamaño promedio de los grupos. Y nuestros pequeños merecen un trato mejor que ese.”

Una coalición de casi 300 grupos comunitarios apoyan la propuesta, la cual no afecta las protecciones de la Prop 13 para propietarios de casas, enteros, pequeños empresarios o la agricultura. Los grupos anti-impuestos dicen que eso haría de California un estado mucho menos amigable para los negocios y que además se perdieran empleos.

Pechthalt señala que la mayoría de los demás estados evalúan así la propiedad comercial e industrial, y piensa que la propuesta traería de regreso la justicia al sistema tributario de California.

“Antes de la 'Prop 13’ los dueños de propiedades y los comercios compartían impuestos a la propiedad como en 50/50. Ahora ese peso lo llevan sobre todo los propietarios; cargamos con un 70 por ciento, o más, de impuestos a la propiedad.”

Los negocios dueños de grandes extensiones de tierra desde los 1970s, como Disneyland y Estudios Universal, serían los más afectados por el cambio. Para ser sujeto de votación, el grupo necesita poco más de 548 mil firmas verificadas, de las 860 mil presentadas.

La iniciativa (en inglés): oag.ca.gov/system/files/initiatives/pdfs/17-0055%20(Funding%20for%20Schools%20and%20Communities)_2.pdf


get more stories like this via email

The Indiana Chamber of Commerce outlined six key priorities for lawmakers ahead of the legislative session in January.

Rather than releasing detailed policy positions, the Chamber emphasized broad focus areas, including workforce, education, economic growth, infrastructure, quality of place and community health.

Phil GiaQuinta, D-Fort Wayne, House Minority Leader, responded to the Chamber's priorities, highlighting the need to address child care as a factor in economic development.

"We talk about economic development with things that impact economic development here in the state. Child care is really one of those," GiaQuinta contended.

The organization stressed the critical role of affordable child care in workforce development, citing a report estimating Indiana loses $4.2 billion annually, including $1.7 billion in tax revenue due to child care challenges. High costs force some parents out of the workforce, straining the state's economy.

Statehouse leaders acknowledged the issue but differ on solutions. Democrats argued child care deserves more state investment, while Republican leaders believe the private sector should play a larger role.

Todd Huston, R-Fishers, Speaker of the House, said businesses should not expect the state to solve their child care problems entirely.

"They've done a lot of different things to try to support families and young families. We will continue to do that," Huston stated. "But I think we also have to set a level of expectations that we're not going to; the state's not going to be funding all universal pre-K."

The Chamber plans to release detailed policy proposals in January, aiming to guide lawmakers toward strategies to strengthen Indiana's economy and workforce.


get more stories like this via email

North Dakota is no stranger to public pension debates. States face pressure to keep retirement systems well-funded and new data show most Americans place great value on such benefits for both government and private-sector workers.

According to the National Institute on Retirement Security, 86% of Americans believe all workers, not just those employed by state and local governments, should have a pension. There are similar approval levels when asked how important public pensions are in recruiting teachers and public safety workers.

Dan Doonan, executive director of the institute, suggested it is not too surprising to see the results.

"Pensions, along with other benefits, are part of creating that culture of careers and not jobs," Doonan explained.

Starting in January, North Dakota will close its main public pension plan for new hires, who will instead be offered a 401(k)-style benefit. The move followed debate over whether it was the right way to address a $1.9 billion unfunded liability. Backers argued it protects benefits for existing workers and taxpayers but skeptics contended it makes it harder to attract workers to the public sector.

Doonan noted the survey results overlap with the idea maintaining an experienced public-sector workforce is a good thing for community members and not just the employee and employer.

"In general, when public services are done well, they're often invisible, right?" Doonan emphasized. "We want good roads, we want safe communities, and I think Americans understand the role of having career public servants in terms of delivering those outcomes."

The Bureau of Labor Statistics said state and local governments employ about 20 million workers, which represents about 13% of the U.S. workforce.

As Nebraskans anticipate the upcoming holiday season, some might also be looking ahead to the 2025 tax season, which will include a new tax credit for family caregivers, including those looking after military veterans.

Starting in 2025, a new state law provides eligible family caregivers up to $2,000 in tax credits for out-of-pocket expenses. The cap increases to $3,000 if the family member receiving care has dementia or is a veteran.

Jina Ragland, associate state director of advocacy and outreach for AARP Nebraska, said those who served have access to care benefits through the Department of Veterans Affairs but added it sometimes is not enough.

"Because some of their service-related illnesses or injuries, they extend beyond what they're able to afford, or maybe what the coverage is through the VA," Ragland explained.

She pointed out it puts more pressure on loved ones assisting them on a daily basis. During National Veterans and Military Families Month, supporters of the new law hope more families will see if they are eligible. Ragland noted while it helps reduce the financial strain, greater awareness of resources is also needed, to help all family caregivers avoid burnout.

Ragland emphasized one example is providing caregivers information about where to turn for guidance when a loved one is first discharged from a hospital. She argued entities at all levels need to maintain progress, because their outreach shows a demand for solutions.

"Over 90% of Nebraskans say that they want to age in place with the lowest level of care," Ragland reported. "In order to do that, oftentimes we have to rely on family caregivers."

There are no age restrictions to qualify for the tax credit. As for eligibility factors, the law includes an income limit of $50,000 dollars for individuals and $100,000 for married couples.