TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — Florida is in the midst of its own Supreme Court nomination controversy, as terms for three of the seven justices expire around the same time a new governor will be sworn into office.

Gov. Rick Scott is publicly claiming his right to find replacements for Justices Barbara Pariente, R. Fred Lewis and Peggy Quince. But in a lawsuit, the League of Women Voters and Common Cause argue that this power should fall to the incoming governor.

Speaking on The Rotunda podcast, League attorney John Mills said lawyers have agreed and the law is clear that Scott doesn't have the authority to fill the vacancies.

"You know, when somebody tells you they are going to do something crazy, you should believe them. And so, we do believe that he'll do it, even though he's admitted he doesn't have the authority,” Mills said. “And the second those nominations are made, if he's in office and he makes an appointment, we have a constitutional crisis."

That's because the seven-person court needs five justices to make decisions. Scott, a Republican, is pushing forward, claiming precedent from past governors working together during transitions to avoid extended vacancies on the high court.

Scott directed the Supreme Court Judicial Nominating Commission to begin accepting and vetting applications for the court appointments. The deadline for those applications is October 8. And there's another deadline, two days after the November 6 general election, for submitting names of potential justices to the governor.

Mills said in his opinion, the commission should start reviewing candidates, but nominations are premature.

"You can't make the nominations to somebody who has no power to make them,” he said. “And part of the reason for that - I mean, just aside from common sense - is that the Constitution requires the governor to make the appointments within 60 days of the nominations."

While Scott claims he'll work together with his successor on interviewing nominees, agreement is far from certain if progressive Democrat Andrew Gillum assumes office, or even for Republican Ron DeSantis, who has asserted his right to choose. The new governor takes office on January 8.



get more stories like this via email

In a significant development for family caregivers across America, AARP is spearheading initiatives at both federal and state levels to provide tax relief for those caring for loved ones. The organization is championing the Credit for Caring Act, which proposes a $5,000 federal tax credit, while also pursuing similar legislation at the state level in Ohio.

Jenny Carlson, AARP Ohio state director, said it's a comprehensive approach to supporting the 48 million Americans who serve as family caregivers.

"We're doubling down on this initiative! We feel strongly that it's going to work on the national level. We are turning our attention to the state law, working towards (a) swift package so that family caregivers could take advantage of it for their 2026 returns," she explained.

Carlson added that Ohio is home to approximately 1.5 million family caregivers, providing an estimated $21 billion worth of unpaid care each year. She added they struggle to balance caregiving with full-time jobs, often sacrificing income and retirement savings. The proposed tax credit has received bipartisan support.

AARP has been vocal in its support for Rep. Mike Carey, R-OH, who is sponsoring the legislation in Congress. Carlson emphasized the importance of enabling caregivers to continue working while supporting their loved ones.

"It's called the Credit for Caring Act, which would provide eligible working caregivers a tax credit to help offset the costs of care that they offer. It would allow them to continue to work while caring for a loved one through illness, disability and aging in place," Carlson said.

A recent AARP backed survey found that 84% of voters across party lines support a tax credit for family caregivers. However, some experts caution that while tax relief is helpful, broader policies-such as increased Medicaid coverage for home care may be necessary to fully address the challenges caregivers face. The bill's future now rests with Congress.

Dozens of local leaders from California are in the nation's capital this week, joining about 2,800 colleagues from around the country at the National League of Cities' Congressional City Conference.

The group met with White House officials Tuesday and is set to see Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., today.

David Sander, a council member and former mayor in the city of Rancho Cordova and immediate past president of the league, said local leaders want to find out how the "DOGE" cuts could impact their cities' bottom lines.

"Because there are so many changes potentially underway, we're really focused on certainty and stability," Sander explained. "Because it's hard in local government, where everything has to work, and we're held accountable."

Local officials are concerned the budget bill being prepped in Congress could eliminate the tax-free status cities now get on their municipal bonds, financing priorities like roads and schools. And in the upcoming transportation bill, local leaders want to continue the previous Trump administration practice of sending funds directly to municipalities, rather than routing them through the state.

Sanders pointed out the briefing on immigration covered the many legal issues surrounding cities' policies on cooperation with federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

"There's an awful lot in the hands of the courts right now," Sanders observed. "Trying to understand the role of a federal detainer versus a federal warrant, versus a local warrant; trying to understand the legalities around all those and what cities can or can't do."

California is home to multiple so-called sanctuary cities, including Berkeley, Fremont, Oakland, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Santa Ana and Watsonville. The conference wraps up today.


get more stories like this via email

It is the North Dakota Senate's turn to ramp up debate on property tax reform, a key issue of this session and lawmakers are hearing from a range of groups, including farmers, to ensure a fair plan.

Several bills to establish property tax relief have already cleared the North Dakota House. Yesterday, a Senate committee took up some of the proposals. All the measures have different language, but a consistent provision is an annual 3% cap on property tax hikes sought by local governments.

Parrell Grossman, legislative director for the North Dakota Soybean Growers Association, told lawmakers he hopes a final package will include agricultural properties.

"Some of these landowners might certainly have significant land and others might be facing huge debt because of their machinery, livestock costs, or low crop prices," Grossman pointed out.

The arguments come as farmers navigate land price issues and other market forces in an era of corporate consolidation. Advocates also acknowledged the need for balance, so small and large communities are not hamstrung in maintaining their infrastructure. Some rural leaders worry about proposed caps limiting their ability to raise enough revenue to not harm vital services.

Brenton Holper, city administrator for the City of Horace, a town of more than 3,000 people just outside Fargo, elaborated on potential service disruptions if local governments are weighed down by any property tax restrictions.

"Instead of plowing the street when there's a couple inches of snow, it might be five, six inches," Holper pointed out. "The thresholds are going to be different."

Still, Holper was among those who said they recognize many people are "fed up" with their property taxes. In a ballot question last fall, North Dakota voters rejected the idea of largely doing away with property taxes but polling has indicated they want policymakers to take meaningful action to keep their yearly bills in check.


get more stories like this via email