SEATTLE – Groups across the country are calling on Congress to address maintenance costs in national parks in order to save some of America's most historic places.

While the National Park Service oversees iconic landscapes such as Mount Rainier National Park, it also preserves historic sites and buildings.

They include the Klondike Gold Rush National Historical Park in Seattle and Ebey's Landing, a site in the Puget Sound preserved since European settlement in the 1850s.

Chris Moore, executive director of Washington Trust for Historic Preservation, says without proper stewardship, unique places like these won't last.

"The worst case scenario is that you begin to lose components of our parks that are vital for telling the story about that park and, in some cases, telling the story of certain periods or certain events in the nation's history," he states.

Moore is hopeful a bill known as the Restore Our Parks Act can address this issue. The bill has passed through a key U.S. Senate committee, and a House panel approved a similar bill.

The legislation would nearly cut in half the country's $11.6 billion deferred maintenance backlog over the next five years, with royalties from energy development on federal lands.

More than 400 places such as the Statue of Liberty, Independence Hall and Native American cultural sites have been designated as national parks and historic monuments in the past 100 years.

Tom Cassidy, vice president for government relations with the National Trust for Historic Preservation, says 3,000 groups from around the country have called upon Congress to dedicate funding to maintenance.

He says the Restore Our Parks bill has support from Republicans, Democrats and the Trump administration.

"That type of alliance of interests to protect our public lands is rare and it's a special thing and is why we want to try to get this legislation across the finish line before the end of the year," he stresses.

Moore also notes preserving parks makes economic sense, especially for nearby communities.

According to the National Park Service, visitors spent more than $500 million in local gateway communities in the Evergreen State in 2017.

"It has a real catalytic effect, a multiplier effect for our communities that surround these parks in terms of visitorship, in terms of tourism and in terms of their ability to take care of their own historic resources as well," he stresses.

Support for this reporting was provided by The Pew Charitable Trusts.


get more stories like this via email

The Mississippi River is the drinking water source for 20 million people and its starting point in northern Minnesota has new protections following completion of a deal to preserve several thousand acres of forested land.

The Conservation Fund and Northern Waters Land Trust said the deal, years in the making, covers more 8,200 acres across nine counties between Walker and Duluth.

Emilee Nelson, associate Minnesota state director for The Conservation Fund, said her group purchased a larger chunk of land in 2020 and since then, the Land Trust worked to secure state funding for the acreage in the deal. She pointed out downstream, the river has seen surrounding land converted to other uses, which takes away key buffers.

"The importance of leaving forests on the landscape really helps to soak up water that hits the landscape like a sponge," Nelson explained. "It helps to filter any sort of debris before it hits the Mississippi River."

Separate plans are being finalized with county governments to ensure permanent management and public access to the lands. Nelson emphasized it should benefit hunters and anglers, while protecting wildlife habitat. She added the timing is important with political pressure on the landscapes for possible industrial uses. Rep. Pete Stauber, R-Minn., is part of the push, citing the need for jobs.

Nelson pointed out with such a deal, local timber companies can still benefit from effective forest management, including the need to clear out dying trees.

"When we own it, we would contract with local loggers to help do prescribed thinnings, and to then deliver lumber to local mills, like in Bemidji," Nelson noted.

Organizations involved in the deal said it will protect jobs in the outdoor recreation and tourism sector.

Access to the beloved Pacific Crest Trail may soon be limited - due to a drop in federal grants and big layoffs proposed for federal public lands agencies.

In the next two weeks, the Trump administration is expected to release the reduction-in-force targets for the National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management.

Megan Wargo, chief executive officer of the Pacific Crest Trail Association, said federal grant money dried up last October, so they've had to cancel 56 weeks of crew maintenance work on the trails.

"If large sections of the trails are forced to be closed because of this lack of maintenance and care, that's devastating that folks won't be able to access their public lands because of these cuts," she explained.

Volunteers help keep the trails clear of debris and repair erosion from storm damage. The Pacific Crest Trail runs more than 2,600 hundred miles from Mexico to Canada and includes landscapes from Anza Borrego in the South, to Sequoia, Kings Canyon, and Lake Tahoe in the Sierras, and points north.

Wargo said the National Trails System Act calls for a public-private partnership to manage the national scenic trails. The Pacific Crest Trail Association normally gets between $667 million per year in federal funding - about a quarter of what it needs to help maintain the PCT.

"Typically, that breakdown is about 25% value that's coming from the federal government, while the other 75% is coming through private donations and that volunteer service hour value," she continued.

Wargo added that cuts to the federal workforce hobble agencies' abilities to make grants and approve volunteer projects. And that means less brush gets cleared, raising the risk of wildfires in California.

April is National Native Plant Month, an observance at the core of South Dakota's identity.

People wanting to protect the state's beloved grasslands encourage landowners in urban and rural areas to set aside growing space. South Dakota's prairies often conjure up images of species like tallgrass, which have deep roots good at absorbing water. But some varieties have not fared as well because of different types of land use. The World Wildlife Fund said only 53% of the Great Plains region's grassland remains intact.

Drew Anderson, a farmer, rancher and conservation advocate from Lemmon, conserves native plants, noting every little bit helps, and they do not have to just grow in rural settings.

"There's just a growing appreciation for the native grasslands that are making their way into urban areas," Anderson pointed out. "People are using big bluestem in front of commercial buildings and places like that."

The desire is reflected in a recent ad campaign from the South Dakota Grasslands Coalition and statewide polling. In a survey commissioned by the group, there was broad bipartisan support among voters to prioritize effective grassland management. Anderson added patience is a challenge they are up against because it can take a year or two to see real evidence of native plant growth.

Anderson added it is not just livestock grazing standing to benefit from an abundance of grasslands.

"The grasses help provide habitat for many different wildlife species, whether it's migratory songbirds (or) pollinators," Anderson emphasized.

If you want to grow some native plants on your property but are unsure how to get started, Anderson recommended visiting your local Natural Resources Conservation Service office. The Grasslands Coalition also has guidance and other key information on its website.