SACRAMENTO, Calif. – If you've ever fished off a pier, swum in a public pool, played ball on a local field or hiked in a state park, you've likely benefited from the Land and Water Conservation Fund.
That program could be permanently reauthorized next week as part of a massive public-lands package before the U.S. House.
The Natural Resources Management Act would expand Joshua Tree and Death Valley National Parks, add new off-road vehicle recreation areas in San Bernardino County, and add 80 miles of wild and scenic rivers, plus 700,000 acres of land to conservation and recreation areas across California.
J.R. Young, a California representative and board member of the group Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, says the fund has touched every corner of the state since its inception in 1964.
"There's not a county in California that has not benefited from a Land and Water Conservation project. The list is massive," Young says. "It's just one of those critical core funding components that unfortunately, not a lot of people know about."
Over the years, the fund has directed $2.4 billion to projects up and down the state, from Humboldt Redwoods State Park to the Lake Merritt bicycle path in Oakland, to a sports complex in Merced County, to Embarcadero Pier in San Diego.
The fund uses no taxpayer dollars, only revenues from offshore oil and gas drilling in federal waters.
Maite Arce, president and CEO of the Hispanic Access Foundation, says the thousands of local parks helped by the LWCF dollars are especially important to urban low-income communities. So, she thinks it is important to fully fund the program going forward.
"It's only been fully funded at its annual $900 million cap twice in 54 years," Arce explains. "So, on average, Congress authorizes Land and Water Conservation Fund to receive only about 46 percent of its allowed amount."
Its backers say the public-lands package also would greatly benefit California's $92 billion outdoor recreation industry. It passed the Senate last week by an overwhelming margin of 92 to 8.
get more stories like this via email
By Danielle Zulkosky for WISH-TV.
Broadcast version by Joe Ulery for Indiana News Service reporting for the WISH-TV-Free Press Indiana-Public News Service Collaboration
Indiana Dunes National Park has lost five employees in the wake of federal cuts hitting national parks, which has raised concerns about park safety and maintenance.
Save the Dunes is an official partner of the Indiana Dunes National Park. The nonprofit is focused on the preservation and restoration of the Indiana Dunes.
Betsy Maher, executive director of Save the Dunes, says the loss of staff could lead to longer lines and poorly managed facilities.
“(It could lead to) unkempt bathrooms, possibly closed down camping sites, overflowing trashcans,” Maher said, highlighting the potential impact on park visitors.
At least one person who mowed the park was laid off, meaning grass could be unmanaged for visitors at times.
But it’s not just bathrooms, grass, and trash cans. The reduction in staff also poses safety risks, with fewer park rangers available for rescues and medical attention.
Maher also emphasizes the importance of maintenance workers and firefighters.
“This area is very prone to fires,” Maher said. “It takes active management to keep those fires at bay.”
Other employees who were let go worked in areas such as restoration management. The park has borders the zig zag through northern Indiana sometimes coming up against industry or residential areas.
Maher says these employees were “critical” for preserving the park’s biodiversity in these areas. Lack of preservation along the borders can have “catastrophic” consequences.
“You have very actively managed lands on the national park side and completely unmanaged lands right across the border,” Maher said. “So it’s very easy for those invasive species, especially those plant species, to get dropped and to take hold in the national park.”
Indiana Dunes National Park is renowned for its biodiversity. Maher said it is the fifth most biologically diverse National Park in the United States.
Despite the challenges posed by staff reductions, Save the Dunes will continue to advocate for the protection of the Indiana Dunes National Park’s unique environment and visitor experience.
Danielle Zulkosky wrote this article for WISH-TV.
get more stories like this via email
With West Virginia's tourism industry seeing dramatic growth in recent years, conservation groups are sounding the alarm about layoffs of federal land-management workers.
Reports indicate 3,400 U.S. Forest Service employees and 1,000 National Park Service workers have been fired nationwide, representing a 10% force reduction for the Forest Service and 5% at the Park Service.
Olivia Miller, program director for the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, said the cutbacks will affect the state's economy.
"Public lands have an enormous economic impact in our state, bringing in around $9 billion annually and supporting about 91,000 jobs," Miller pointed out. "Many communities are built around outdoor recreation and tourism."
The Park Service reported West Virginia saw more than 2 million visitors to its national parks in 2023, with park visitors spending more than $120 million in the state.
In 2023, West Virginia saw a 17% increase in visitor spending in the state compared with a national increase around 1%. The state Department of Tourism forecasts continued visitor spending will create 21,000 jobs annually through 2030.
Advocates are pointing to the preexisting staffing problems at national forests including Monongahela, which is described as chronically understaffed. Miller noted understaffed national parks and forests will have a slower response to invasive species and sees the likelihood of an overall decline in the quality of visitor experiences.
"Trail maintenance will likely become harder," Miller observed. "Cleaning up campsites and opening them up for people over the summer is going to become more and more difficult for these agencies to sustain."
National parks nationwide saw more than 325 million visits in 2023, a 4% increase over the year prior.
Disclosure: The West Virginia Highlands Conservancy contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy and Priorities, Environment, Urban Planning/Transportation, and Water. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
People in Colorado and seven other Mountain West states may want to see changes in the federal government writ large but they oppose cuts to agencies charged with protecting public lands, wildlife and other natural resources, according to the latest Conservation in the West poll by Colorado College.
Dave Metz, partner and president of FM3 Research, said vast majorities support agencies including the National Parks, Forest Service, and Fish and Wildlife Service.
"When we ask people whether they would support or oppose reducing funding to these agencies, the answers are overwhelming, they would oppose such cuts," Metz reported. "Three quarters of Western voters overall express opposition and that sentiment is thoroughly bipartisan."
The survey was conducted before the Trump administration fired thousands of federal National Parks and Forest Service workers. The Department of Government Efficiency, led by Elon Musk, has defended its efforts as necessary to eliminate what it called "waste and fraud."
Kathryn Hahne, director at New Bridge Strategy, said support for federal agencies is also strong among MAGA supporters. Among those surveyed, eight in 10 said they approve of the National Park Service.
"Seventy-four percent approve of the U.S. Forest Service, 71% approve of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services, and 69% of MAGA supporters oppose reducing funding to those agencies," Hahne explained.
More than seven in 10 people surveyed do not want additional public lands opened up for drilling and mining, and 63% oppose reducing Endangered Species Act protections. Metz added awareness on the threats posed by climate change has increased by 22 points since the first poll 15 years ago.
"We now have more than three quarters of Western voters who are telling us they view climate change as a serious problem," Metz observed. "When you look at Gen Z voters, 90% of them tell us they view it as a serious problem."
get more stories like this via email