WASHINGTON – This week, more than 100 clean-water advocates traveled to Washington DC, urging lawmakers to increase funding for clean water in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.

For the past two years, the Trump administration has either proposed cuts or zeroed-out funding the Environmental Protection Agency's Chesapeake Bay Program. This year, the Choose Clean Water Coalition, which has fought against those cutbacks, is aiming higher by asking Congress to fund the program at $90 million, instead of its usual request for $73 million.

Coalition Director Chanté Coleman says this is the first increase request since 2015.

"It's really, really critical this year that we get additional funding, because there are certain triggers happening with the Chesapeake Bay right now that are threatening to stall all the progress that we've been making,” says Coleman. “These are issues like climate change, which is causing flooding and more severe storms."

The coalition – made up of more than 230 nonprofit organizations – managed to convince a bipartisan group of lawmakers to maintain funding in last year's omnibus spending bill.

It's a two-step process for increasing what's considered the core part of the Chesapeake Bay cleanup effort. The funds would first have to be approved by a policy committee, and then the Appropriations Committee would take up the $90 million request.

Maryland Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen sits on both committees, but says the increase will still be a challenge because of a tight federal budget.

"We believe have some added urgency to increasing the number,” says Van Hollen. “And that's because of the situation where the Susquehanna River comes into the Chesapeake Bay, there's the Conowingo Dam, where more sediment, more nutrients are flowing over the dam."

Despite that setback, Coleman says the cleanup is showing significant progress including what she calls the largest resurgence of underwater grasses anywhere in the world, providing safe habitat for species like the blue crab.

"Because we're seeing the results of our efforts, the Bay is getting cleaner, water clarity is improving, water quality is improving,” says Coleman. “If we don't receive this funding, then the chances of it stalling the Bay cleanup are higher."

The coalition also asked for increased funding for the Bay's trails program, as well as conservation programs in the newest Farm Bill to support responsible farming practices to minimize farm runoff.



get more stories like this via email

Pennsylvania's landscape is being transformed through billions of dollars in federal funding from the Inflation Reduction Act and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, which support numerous large-scale projects.

Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., emphasized the multifaceted benefits Pennsylvania has reaped from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. He pointed to record-breaking investments in roads, bridges, water systems and transportation across the state.

Casey pointed out $13 billion was allocated to Pennsylvania for roads and bridges.

"For example, in Pittsburgh, raising the flood wall that protects the Parkway East and in downtown Pittsburgh, including the so-called bathtub section of interstate 376," Casey outlined. "That often floods during heavy storms. That's a $6.6 million project that will help ensure that it can stay open and allow for traffic to flow through."

According to Casey's website, progress has been made on key provisions in the Senate's initial fiscal year 2024 funding bills. The provisions cover a range of issues, from anti-drug efforts to economic development, and include more than $172 million for Pennsylvania community projects.

Casey noted a significant investment in the infrastructure bill provides funding for removing and replacing aging lead service lines in the water system in Pennsylvania.

"In Pittsburgh, that amounts to, in terms of the current funding, amounts to 4,900 homes and businesses in the city or surrounding communities," Casey explained. "That funding level is over $30 million."

Casey emphasized the infrastructure bill allocates significant funding to improve internet connectivity across Pennsylvania, particularly in rural areas where up to 30% of residents lack access. He added the investment in high-speed internet will also address urban dead spots and is expected to be one of the most transformative aspects of the legislation.


get more stories like this via email

Minnesota is part of a patchwork of states trying to reimagine storm preparedness, by making roofs on homes stronger - before winds and hail fueled by climate change can wreak havoc.

The nonprofit news organization Stateline reports that Alabama has pioneered an approach that provides financial assistance to homeowners in need of an updated roof.

Officials say if more people take advantage, pressure will be taken off of insurance companies dealing with an onslaught of claims after a natural disaster.

Minnesota is designing a similar program, and the state Commerce Department's Energy Affordability Office Director Tracy Smetana said future grants could help eligible homeowners avoid a costly fix, and stabilize the insurance market.

"The insurance companies are required to offer a premium discount for upgraded or new roofs built to that fortified standard," said Smetana. "So that's a benefit again to individual homeowners, but of course, insurance rates across the state and insurance availability."

The fortified standard she mentioned is one gaining more traction in making buildings more climate resilient.

Meanwhile, policy observers say the market stability can help prevent major insurance carriers from pulling out of certain regions because of risk factors.

While the Minnesota Legislature approved planning funds, more money will need to be secured next session for the actual grants.

Looking past the broader financial benefits, Smetana said preventing more roofs from blowing off might mean not as many people will be displaced after a severe storm.

"Currently, when your home is damaged by wind and hail," said Smetana, "quite often it involves water in your home and makes it unlivable for a period of time."

If state lawmakers approve grant funds next year, Smetana said they could become available in late 2025.

While the program is still coming together, applicants would need to be insured and their home would have to be in relatively good shape outside of the roof upgrade needs.

This comes as many property owners in Minnesota recover from flood damage over the past couple of weeks.




get more stories like this via email

A decision from the U.S. Supreme Court protects Idaho rivers from what conservation groups say are harmful mining practices. The justices rejected a petition to review a case in which a California suction dredge miner conducted his operations without a Clean Water Act permit in Idaho.

The miner, Shannon Poe, was fined $150,000 in 2021 by a district court for polluting the South Fork of the Clearwater River. The Idaho Conservation League filed suit against Poe for failing to get a permit back in 2018.

Jonathan Oppenheimer, governmental relations director for the Idaho Conservation League, said the Supreme Court's decision is a victory for Idaho's rivers.

"We were concerned that it could go the other way and are pleased to see the outcome that really upholds what we see as the rule of law - that if you're going to discharge pollutants into waters of the United States, that you need to have appropriate permits and take actions to protect those waters for all Americans," he said.

Suction dredge mining uses an underwater hose to excavate gold from riverbeds. It can release dangerous metals like arsenic and mercury. Poe refused to get a permit for the mining. 21 states, including Idaho, signed on to a 'Friend of the Court' brief in support of Poe.

Dredge miners in Idaho must obtain a pollution discharge permit from the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality to comply with the Clean Water Act. Oppenheimer said this type of dredging is a highly disruptive practice that kicks up sediment and can harm endangered and protected species in the river, such as salmon and steelhead.

"It can impact fisheries habitat as well as the insects that grow and develop in the water and on the rocks that they are disturbing that then feed the fish and other aquatic species," he added.

Oppenheimer noted the justices' rejecting a review of this case means the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision requiring permits for suction dredge mining goes back into place, protecting waterways in the West.