HARRISBURG, Pa. — A new report says Pennsylvania is wasting $290 million on cyber charter schools each year. The report, from Education Voters of Pennsylvania, says cyber charters are paid based on what the districts pay per student in brick-and-mortar schools, not on the actual cost of educating them at home on a computer.

In one 2-year period, the total paid to cyber charters rose by more than $54 million, but nearly half was from increasing average tuition, not increased enrollment. According to Education Voters executive director Susan Spicka, last year school districts paid cyber charters more than $500 million.

"In every corner of the Commonwealth, school districts are raising taxes to pay these increasing cyber charter bills. And they're also cutting programs and they're not making new investments in students,” Spicka said.

Cyber charter schools say they receive only 71% of the amount spent per-student in regular schools while being required to educate students to the same standards.

But Spicka cited a recent study that found cyber charter students in the state lose an average of 106 days of learning in reading and 118 days of learning in math each year compared with other students.

"Most of them fall further and further behind their peers who are in district schools,” she said. “And so, Pennsylvanians are paying over half a billion dollars for cyber school failure."

She added cyber charters consistently are among the lowest performing schools in the state, with graduation rates as low as 31%.

Spicka noted state legislators are actively looking at the issue of cyber charter funding. She said Curtis Sonney, who chairs the House education committee, has introduced a bill, and Republicans in the state Senate may be preparing to act as well.

"Gov. Wolf is also taking steps toward working with the legislature to enact common-sense funding reforms to match the funding that cyber charters receive with the actual cost of educating a student at home on a computer,” Spicka said.

She said the cost to cyber-educate a student is less than $5,000 a year, far less than the cost of traditional public schools or regular charter schools.

Recent changes to Florida's education laws have removed information on consent, contraceptives and prenatal development from many health lessons at school.

Parents are concerned the Florida Department of Education's policies may leave some districts without vital instruction.

Stephana Ferrell, director of research and insight for the Florida Freedom to Read Project in Orange County, is worried about what she sees as gaps in her children's education, including access to comprehensive health information.

"It's unfortunate that parents have been opted out of these educational experiences," Ferrell stated. "But it's now time for us all to get informed about what our kids are missing and make the extra effort to ensure that our young citizens are armed with this information."

Advocacy groups, including PEN America and EveryLibrary, cautioned overcompliance with state laws may lead to the removal of books on topics like anatomy, teen pregnancy and sexual assault. In a joint letter, they urged Florida school superintendents and school board attorneys to exercise restraint and preserve the resources for students.

Ferrell described a clash between two views: one believing ignorance protects innocence, and another believing being informed is the best way to understand and avoid risks. She sided with the latter, saying education safeguards the community.

"We really are trying to encourage that information to remain available," Ferrell emphasized. "There are lots of nonfiction, well-written and age-appropriate materials that can be made available in the library, and have been made available in libraries in the past."

Florida school districts have struggled for years to determine which books should remain in libraries under laws signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis. The laws allow parents and others to challenge books deemed "inappropriate," though recent legislative changes limit the number of challenges. This fall, the Department of Education released a list of more than 700 books removed from, or discontinued in, schools statewide.


get more stories like this via email

New York's Board of Regents approved a Department of Education funding request for climate education.

The board is putting more than $536,000 aside for climate change education and materials.

New Jersey is the only state mandating climate change be taught in all subject areas. Connecticut teaches it as well, but primarily in science.

Emily Fano, director of climate resilience education programs with the National Wildlife Federation, described how climate change can be taught across multiple subject areas.

"There are so many ways climate can be integrated into math class, graphing greenhouse gas emissions for example," said Fano. "Social studies, you can talk about social movements like the youth climate movement that has grown by leaps and bounds all over the world."

She added that health classes could teach the health impacts of air pollution and poor air quality.

The funding allotment faces no opposition, and a Yale University report finds 81% of New York adults feel climate change should be taught in schools. This is higher than the national average of 75%.

If the funding's approved, climate change will be taught in New York schools starting in the 2026-2027 school year.

But, climate education has faced an uphill battle.

A bill establishing a course on climate change in elementary and secondary schools garnered widespread support. But, it failed in the state legislature.

Fano said along with a new climate education bill, more work must be done to make this a reality.

"We'll continue working with the state education department and our partners to make sure that our students are going to get the climate education they need and deserve," said Fano. "So, we will continue working on this issue regardless, but we really hope the Governor understands the urgency of this request."

While this funding request provides a framework for training current educators about how to teach climate change, Fano said she wants this training for people studying to be teachers.

An Education Week Research Center poll finds 18% of teachers don't address climate change because they feel out of their element discussing it.

School bus transportation challenges are impacting one central Indiana community.

Long ride times are more than an inconvenience, according to an October survey. Bus driver shortages and late arrivals to school have also been documented by the education advocacy group RISE INDY.

The organization says data show a correlation between these transportation hiccups and student outcomes and educational equity.

Katherine Chi, spokesperson for RISE INDY, said some Indianapolis Public School students are facing a "literacy crisis."

"Seventy-one percent of Marion County students, grades three through eight, are performing below grade level in literacy," said Chi. "If there was an innovative way for them to get to school, then they can attend school regularly and get the skills they need to succeed, including learning to read."

Eight hundred residents in five IPS districts took the poll. Forty-six percent of respondents feel a combined transportation system would promote student fairness.

Qualified drivers, safe vehicles, adult supervision and effective communication were also listed as the most valued components of a school-provided transportation system.

The Indiana General Assembly passed House Bill 1380 last year. The measure introduced changes to the state's student transportation policy.

Chi said it is important to understand what the community thinks about the revisions and the legislators' role in helping shape future policy and implementation.

"This bill requires the Secretary of Education to create a plan for a pilot program to address the use, operation and management of school transportation," said Chi. "We are going to continue to monitor this issue closely and just keep community informed on how everyone can support this critical work."

Eighty-three percent of poll respondents support a combined transportation system that would streamline operations, reduce costs and improve service reliability.

Convenient student pick-up and drop-off locations were also listed as important.