HARRISBURG, Pa. - State senators and representatives from both major parties joined environmental groups in Harrisburg on Tuesday in urging Gov. Tom Wolf to move immediately on new rules to cut methane emissions in the Commonwealth.

Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas, but the federal Environmental Protection Agency wants to roll back regulations on emissions from the oil and gas industry. The state Department of Environmental Protection has proposed new rules to cut emissions from existing oil and gas facilities.

John Walliser, senior vice president for legal and government affairs with the Pennsylvania Environmental Council, said Tuesday's event is proof of bipartisan support for the DEP proposal.

"The department has been working on this for some time," he said, "but until the department puts it out for public comment and issues it as a final regulation, we need to keep moving the process forward."

A recent analysis by the Environmental Defense Fund found that the oil and gas industry in Pennsylvania is emitting 520,000 tons of methane every year. Methane, the main ingredient in natural gas, accounts for 25% of current global warming.

Walliser said reducing methane emissions is critical to protect Pennsylvania communities from the worst impacts of climate change.

"Pennsylvania is the number two producer of natural gas in the country," he said, "and if the federal government's not going to lead on this issue, then it's incumbent on the states to do so."

He added that cutting methane emissions also will be critical to meeting the commitments in the governor's executive order on climate issued in January.

Walliser said opening the comment period on DEP's draft regulations would let the department get input from the industry, the public and environmental groups to improve the final rule.

"There are a few areas we would like to see them strengthen to make sure that they are addressing all the potential sources of methane emissions," he said.

Legislators at Tuesday's gathering emphasized that with the EPA withdrawing from the fight against climate change, it's up to Pennsylvania and other states to take the lead.

Wolf's executive order is online at governor.pa.gov.


get more stories like this via email

Pennsylvania's landscape is being transformed through billions of dollars in federal funding from the Inflation Reduction Act and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, which support numerous large-scale projects.

Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., emphasized the multifaceted benefits Pennsylvania has reaped from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. He pointed to record-breaking investments in roads, bridges, water systems and transportation across the state.

Casey pointed out $13 billion was allocated to Pennsylvania for roads and bridges.

"For example, in Pittsburgh, raising the flood wall that protects the Parkway East and in downtown Pittsburgh, including the so-called bathtub section of interstate 376," Casey outlined. "That often floods during heavy storms. That's a $6.6 million project that will help ensure that it can stay open and allow for traffic to flow through."

According to Casey's website, progress has been made on key provisions in the Senate's initial fiscal year 2024 funding bills. The provisions cover a range of issues, from anti-drug efforts to economic development, and include more than $172 million for Pennsylvania community projects.

Casey noted a significant investment in the infrastructure bill provides funding for removing and replacing aging lead service lines in the water system in Pennsylvania.

"In Pittsburgh, that amounts to, in terms of the current funding, amounts to 4,900 homes and businesses in the city or surrounding communities," Casey explained. "That funding level is over $30 million."

Casey emphasized the infrastructure bill allocates significant funding to improve internet connectivity across Pennsylvania, particularly in rural areas where up to 30% of residents lack access. He added the investment in high-speed internet will also address urban dead spots and is expected to be one of the most transformative aspects of the legislation.


get more stories like this via email

Minnesota is part of a patchwork of states trying to reimagine storm preparedness, by making roofs on homes stronger - before winds and hail fueled by climate change can wreak havoc.

The nonprofit news organization Stateline reports that Alabama has pioneered an approach that provides financial assistance to homeowners in need of an updated roof.

Officials say if more people take advantage, pressure will be taken off of insurance companies dealing with an onslaught of claims after a natural disaster.

Minnesota is designing a similar program, and the state Commerce Department's Energy Affordability Office Director Tracy Smetana said future grants could help eligible homeowners avoid a costly fix, and stabilize the insurance market.

"The insurance companies are required to offer a premium discount for upgraded or new roofs built to that fortified standard," said Smetana. "So that's a benefit again to individual homeowners, but of course, insurance rates across the state and insurance availability."

The fortified standard she mentioned is one gaining more traction in making buildings more climate resilient.

Meanwhile, policy observers say the market stability can help prevent major insurance carriers from pulling out of certain regions because of risk factors.

While the Minnesota Legislature approved planning funds, more money will need to be secured next session for the actual grants.

Looking past the broader financial benefits, Smetana said preventing more roofs from blowing off might mean not as many people will be displaced after a severe storm.

"Currently, when your home is damaged by wind and hail," said Smetana, "quite often it involves water in your home and makes it unlivable for a period of time."

If state lawmakers approve grant funds next year, Smetana said they could become available in late 2025.

While the program is still coming together, applicants would need to be insured and their home would have to be in relatively good shape outside of the roof upgrade needs.

This comes as many property owners in Minnesota recover from flood damage over the past couple of weeks.




get more stories like this via email

A decision from the U.S. Supreme Court protects Idaho rivers from what conservation groups say are harmful mining practices. The justices rejected a petition to review a case in which a California suction dredge miner conducted his operations without a Clean Water Act permit in Idaho.

The miner, Shannon Poe, was fined $150,000 in 2021 by a district court for polluting the South Fork of the Clearwater River. The Idaho Conservation League filed suit against Poe for failing to get a permit back in 2018.

Jonathan Oppenheimer, governmental relations director for the Idaho Conservation League, said the Supreme Court's decision is a victory for Idaho's rivers.

"We were concerned that it could go the other way and are pleased to see the outcome that really upholds what we see as the rule of law - that if you're going to discharge pollutants into waters of the United States, that you need to have appropriate permits and take actions to protect those waters for all Americans," he said.

Suction dredge mining uses an underwater hose to excavate gold from riverbeds. It can release dangerous metals like arsenic and mercury. Poe refused to get a permit for the mining. 21 states, including Idaho, signed on to a 'Friend of the Court' brief in support of Poe.

Dredge miners in Idaho must obtain a pollution discharge permit from the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality to comply with the Clean Water Act. Oppenheimer said this type of dredging is a highly disruptive practice that kicks up sediment and can harm endangered and protected species in the river, such as salmon and steelhead.

"It can impact fisheries habitat as well as the insects that grow and develop in the water and on the rocks that they are disturbing that then feed the fish and other aquatic species," he added.

Oppenheimer noted the justices' rejecting a review of this case means the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision requiring permits for suction dredge mining goes back into place, protecting waterways in the West.