MADISON, Wis. — Wisconsin farmers are struggling to stay afloat as political battles take center stage. Republican Senate leaders said they were upset with state agriculture secretary-designee Brad Pfaff for criticizing the GOP for not moving fast enough to release money for farmer suicide prevention efforts. So they rejected his confirmation.

Democratic Sen. Jon Erpenbach said he believes the move was politically motivated against Gov. Tony Evers, but said Republicans are hurting farmers instead.

"This isn't good for them,” Erpenbach said. “This is another somewhat of a setback - not so much of a setback for Gov. Evers as much as it is for those who depend on consistency and knowing what policies are going to be and know that they have someone in their corner fighting for them."

Evers blasted the decision with an expletive, but his office later announced that Randy Romanski, who has worked in state government for decades, would be interim secretary of agriculture. On Monday, Evers hired Pfaff as director of business and rural development for the state Department of Administration.

Erpenbach said despite the quick action by the governor to smooth things over, he thinks the move by his Republican colleagues was an unnecessary blow to the ag community.

"We're leading the nation in farm bankruptcies. Prices are down, mental health issues are up, it's very, very, very difficult,” he said. “And obviously the tariffs coming out of Washington, D.C., have not helped Wisconsin farmers at all."

There are still no details on the ousted agriculture commissioner's new role, except for an announcement stating Pfaff's experience supporting and advocating for Wisconsin small businesses and rural communities will be used to help grow the state's economy.


get more stories like this via email

Knowing weather patterns is part of farmers' skillset, helping them protect their land and profits.

But a North Dakota producer worries about the future of those tools as the Trump administration cuts staff at the National Weather Service.

Reports surfaced late last week that hundreds of probationary employees of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration were let go as the Trump administration re-shapes the federal workforce through massive layoffs.

Additional layoffs are excepted. The National Weather Service is a component of NOAA, and North Dakota Farmer Tyler Stafslien said it's a tremendous asset.

"If you're considering planting in the spring, and you go to the NWS website and you see that there's gonna be a ton of moisture in ten days or seven days from now," said Stafslien, "you might go a little harder to try to get the crop in, knowing that likely you're going to have to shut down when that moisture gets there."

Stafslien added that long-range weather outlooks help avoid planting too much fertilizer.

He said there are other weather sources he pays for, but the free National Weather Service forecasts tend to be more accurate.

It's unclear how the layoffs will impact operations, but observers say even small disruptions to data collection for forecast models could hinder accuracy.

The administration says massive layoffs are needed to cut waste.

Beyond the Weather Service cuts, Stafslien said he worries about another trade war taking shape under a new Trump administration. This week, tariffs involving Canada and Mexico could go into effect.

Stafslien said he felt the impact of similar moves during Trump's first term. He eventually got emergency relief, but stressed that's not something farmers want to plan for.

"We'd rather not have to wonder," said Stafslien, "whether or not there will be some ad-hoc disaster program that's keep us from going into bankruptcy, frankly."

Advocates for independent farmers say they want policymakers to instead help find other global markets to send their products to.

Stafslien, a North Dakota Farmers Union board member, said he also worries about U.S. Department of Agriculture layoffs hurting farmers in need of technical assistance for loan applications or navigating conservation programs.

He said he's still waiting on full payment for sustainability efforts.

The agency is trying to rehire some staff that had been focused on bird-flu mitigation.

Mass layoffs by the Trump administration are cutting into essential services across the federal government.

In Nebraska, that includes overseeing the U.S. Department of Agriculture's response to the avian flu outbreak, working with state agencies that regulate large animal confinement operations.

One-third of the Nebraska workers across three USDA divisions have lost their jobs - including at the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center in Clay Center.

New U.S. Ag Secretary Brooke Rollins says the agency is "eliminating positions that are no longer necessary."

But Nebraska Farmer's Union President John Hansen said many of the federal programs help the state's farmers and ranchers meet conservation goals.

"Putting solar panels on their hog units," said Hansen, "or they're making improvements in their cropping system, or they're updating their diesel irrigation engine and moving it into an electric motor system."

The USDA makes funds available to CAFO operators trying to implement more environmentally friendly practices and reduce toxic manure runoff that can affect air quality and groundwater.

It isn't clear what will happen to those programs or the people who still work there.

Hansen added that some Nebraska farmers decided to upgrade their operations because they had federal funds to help them.

Now, he said they may no longer have access to that money, which leaves them in the lurch.

"The folks who do the work and take the risk and produce our nation's food and fiber and fuel are already in very vulnerable financial positions," said Hansen. "All of these folks that are being terminated are part of the public-private partnership that we have between agriculture and our federal government. "

The cuts across many high profile agencies are part of the Trump administration's goal of reducing the size of the federal government.



get more stories like this via email

The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources has approved a permit to expand Ridge Breeze Dairy in Salem despite hundreds of local objections.

The concentrated animal feeding operation would grow from 1,700 cows to 6,500 or four times its current size, making it the largest such facility in western Wisconsin. The approval starts a 60-day timer to contest the decision.

Danny Akenson, field organizer for the group Grassroots Organizing Western Wisconsin, said it has been on a mission to get more local operations ordinances passed to better regulate the industry.

"There are people in Pierce County whose lives could be put in harm's way because of this," Akenson contended. "Those people should have their voices heard and taken seriously, and we'll be both exploring options to make sure that's the case and continuing to push for local ordinances that will protect our homes."

Ridge Breeze's expansion plans include storing, hauling and spreading 80 million gallons of waste in Pierce, Pepin and Saint Croix counties. Akenson pointed out the operations ordinances, which have already been passed in some towns and counties, include requirements for such things as addressing damage to roads by large manure tankers.

The number of large-scale operations in the state has risen every year since 2005. Currently, there are more than 340 across the state and 90% of them are dairy operations. Grassroots organizers argued many aspects of their operations are unregulated or under-regulated, including air pollution, infectious disease, carcass removal and biosecurity plans.

Akenson noted regulations from the DNR primarily cover the effects of livestock waste on water and do not have a limit on how large they can be.

"What the operations ordinance essentially is, is a series of plans that is asking the CAFO to supply how they're going to address these concerns that are among residents," Akenson outlined. "It's not a ban on CAFOs. It's a message that said, 'Yes you can come into our community, but you have to show us your homework.'"

Akenson added the state has not seen any meaningful regulatory changes for concentrated animal feeding operations for about 20 years. Proponents said they are good for business and are an economic necessity to keep operating costs down and prices for milk, cheese and meat products affordable.


get more stories like this via email